Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'? Is this what Progressives have come too?

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Whether you post the statute or I post the quote I posted, it's all the same.

There is but one critical issue in this event:  Can the shooter prove she was in fear of her life when she pulled the trigger?

Scenario:  A thief who has broken into your home, has your favorite bottle of champagne in his hand and is climbing out your window attempting to get away -- and you shoot and kill him.  

See you in prison, Markle, where people like you belong.

And why does Markle belong in prison?

Because he thinks he has the right to kill anyone whether or not he's in fear of his life.  Someone who thinks like a murderer belongs in prison, or perhaps the republican senate.  Right?

Come on...you act like you are senile and belong in a communist country.

And you act like an uptight bitch with her panties in a twist.  Do you really believe it's okay to gun down a thief when he or she's no threat to you?  I know this will make you sulk even more, but I'm not inviting you to the Bernie won the Presidency party.  

Vikingwoman wrote:You can't in most places kill someone if your life is not in danger. I am surprised about this story as the article says the kid was exiting through a window when he was shot. Unless your life is threatened you really can't use deadly force.

Bob wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

See you in prison, Markle, where people like you belong.

And why does Markle belong in prison?

Markle belongs in prison because he's an old white man,  a conservative,  and a republican.

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:You can't in most places kill someone if your life is not in danger. I am surprised about this story as the article says the kid was exiting through a window when he was shot. Unless your life is threatened you really can't use deadly force.

You just absolutely refuse to read and understand the statute, don't you?

Why do you ignore the part in the article that says there was an ALTERCATION AT THE WINDOW?

Why is that?  Really?

Vikingwoman wrote:

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:You can't in most places kill someone if your life is not in danger. I am surprised about this story as the article says the kid was exiting through a window when he was shot. Unless your life is threatened you really can't use deadly force.

You just absolutely refuse to read and understand the statute, don't you?

Why do you ignore the part in the article that says there was an ALTERCATION AT THE WINDOW?

Why is that?  Really?

Depends on what kind of altercation. I already pointed that out. You don't really know if it was verbal or what. The kid's not here to tell his side. The woman could be lying.

Floridatexan wrote:
Why don't you put that duct tape over your mouth, Markle?  And you still haven't fixed the TYPO in your header.