Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'? Is this what Progressives have come too?

Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'? Is this what Progressives have come too?

+3
Wordslinger
Floridatexan
Markle
7 posters

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Markle

Markle

Is this what Progressives have come too?

Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'?

Relatives of a teenaged home invader who was killed by a homeowner while seemingly exiting the home he had broken into are asking observers to consider the mentality of children “raised in the hood.”

17-year-old Trevon Johnson was shot and killed after the 54-year-old woman homeowner was alerted to his crime via a home surveillance system. After arriving at her home, she witnessed Johnson exiting a window of her house. There was then a confrontation in which Johnson was shot once. Police arrived on the scene within seconds and applied CPR. After being rushed to the hospital, Johnson was pronounced dead.

Seemingly justifying her relative’s commission of burglary, Johnson’s cousin Nautika Harris suggested it was the only way through which he could obtain money.

“You have to understand, you have to look at it from a child's point of view that was raised in the hood. How he gonna get his money to have clothes to go to school?" asked Harris.

"I don't care if she have her gun license, her rights, or any of that,” said Harris. “That is way beyond law. Way beyond."

Speaking of what she described as Johnson’s bright future, Harris said her cousin loved education and learning.

"He was not supposed to die like this. He had a future ahead of him. Trevon had goals. He was very big on education. He loved going to school. He loved learning,” added Harris.

Rejecting the police’s characterization of the use of lethal force as having been lawfully applied in defense of property, Harris said the 54-year-old female homeowner should have allowed her cousin to flee.

"It's no reason, she should've waited until after he walked out the yard," said Harris.

No word yet from the campaigns of Hillary Clinton or Senator Bernie Sanders on Johnson’s eligibility for integration into the left-wing racial agitprop of Black Lives Matter, a narrative both have endorsed and furthered. Also no word yet from President Barack Obama or Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

Below is a mugshot of Johnson from earlier this year....

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4144/relatives-killed-17-year-old-home-invader-how-else-robert-kraychik?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=121115-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Another heaping load of crap from the forum propagandist. How do you stand yourself?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Another "that dirty little nigger" cheapshot by Markle. Yes the kid was a burglar and the home-owner may have been justified. Markle couldn't pass the opportunity to demonstrate his white racism by featuring the twisted reasoning of the dead robber's family. And then, adding more dung to his propaganda shit, he labels the thief a progressive.

Reality.

Guest


Guest

You're right... progressives would use the force of the central govt to take what they want.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:You're right... progressives would use the force of the central govt to take what they want.

BS...if anything, the government has been manipulated to serve the interests of a few wealthy individuals, including many members of Congress, over the past 40 years.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

What happens if a black homeowner shoots and kills a black invader inside his home?  Does that make the black homeowner be a racist too?  Or is it only white homeowners protecting their homes who are automatically racists?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Bob wrote:What happens if a black homeowner shoots and kills a black invader inside his home?  Does that make the black homeowner be a racist too?  Or is it only white homeowners protecting their homes who are automatically racists?


Bob: There is no evidence that racism played any part in this robber shooting. The racism I referred to in my thread was Markle's -- the way he reported the incident.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I'm old school on this one,  wordslinger.  As much as I want to accept the modern progressive notion that someone is justified in invading my home because he has no spending money,  I just can't get that modern or that progressive.
Maybe when the old white men like me die off,  the majority then will modernize and progressify the law to justify home invasion when somebody has no spending money.

It's just like the new modern progressive way of thinking that debt is a good thing and accruing more debt is an even better thing.  I can't wrap my mind around that one either.
I guess like most old white men,  I'm just a dinosaur from a different era.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Bob wrote:I'm old school on this one,  wordslinger.  As much as I want to accept the modern progressive notion that someone is justified in invading my home because he has no spending money,  I just can't get that modern or that progressive.
Maybe when the old white men like me die off,  the majority then will modernize and progressify the law to justify home invasion when somebody has no spending money.

It's just like the new modern progressive way of thinking that debt is a good thing and accruing more debt is an even better thing.  I can't wrap my mind around that one either.
I guess like most old white men,  I'm just a dinosaur from a different era.


In no way do I try to justify the motive of the dead burglar. No one is justified to break into and rob someone's belongings -- not for any reason.

Calling the dead robber a progressive is total bullshit. I'm about as progressive as you will find, and wouldn't think of robbing or cheating someone.

Did you really think I was justifying the dead black kid's actions? Once again, my thrust in this thread was to point out Markle's obvious racism by carefully detailing the alleged justifying statements of the dead robber's family.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:Another "that dirty little nigger" cheapshot by Markle.  Yes the kid was a burglar and the home-owner may have been justified.  Markle couldn't pass the opportunity to demonstrate his white racism by featuring the twisted reasoning of the dead robber's family.  And then, adding more dung to his propaganda shit, he labels the thief a progressive.

Reality.

Obviously, it is you who are making the racial slurs, once again emphasizing your racism, not me.

Where did I even state the race of the thief.

Once again, my Socialist/Communist good friend Wordslinger would prefer that these facts about his comrades remain hidden. I understand that I really do. If I held such destructive beliefs, I too would want, make that demand, that they be held secret. Such as in Communist China.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Bob wrote:What happens if a black homeowner shoots and kills a black invader inside his home?  Does that make the black homeowner be a racist too?  Or is it only white homeowners protecting their homes who are automatically racists?

Bob:  There is no evidence that racism played any part in this robber shooting.  The racism I referred to in my thread was Markle's -- the way he reported the incident.  

Please be specific, precisely how was the way I "presented" the factual article...racist?

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Wordslinger wrote:
Did you really think I was justifying the dead black kid's actions?

No but his relatives were sure justifying it.

Guest


Guest

Bob wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Did you really think I was justifying the dead black kid's actions?

No but his relatives were sure justifying it.

That seems to be the crux of the matter - that the burglar's cousin proclaims justification for the illegal act, by his being raised in "the hood".  Which, of course, is utter nonsense, and, if allowed to continue, portends disaster for the nation.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Markle would like to paint all progressives with a broad brush. Sorry, Markle, your schtick has fallen short again. And please learn to spell "to". The woman certainly had a right to defend herself. Now she'll have to live with the fact that she took a life.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Bob wrote:What happens if a black homeowner shoots and kills a black invader inside his home?  Does that make the black homeowner be a racist too?  Or is it only white homeowners protecting their homes who are automatically racists?

Bob:  There is no evidence that racism played any part in this robber shooting.  The racism I referred to in my thread was Markle's -- the way he reported the incident.  

Please be specific, precisely how was the way I "presented" the factual article...racist?

Here's the first line of the article you quoted: "Relatives of a teenaged home invader who was killed by a homeowner while seemingly exiting the home he had broken into are asking observers to consider the mentality of children “raised in the hood.”

If the dead robber was "raised in the hood," he wasn't Asian, Latino, or White. The primary reason you created this thread was to mock twisted black hood thinking. Obviously, if the robber was white and poor, you wouldn't have given the story a second look.

And now that I've been specific, how about you explaining why the dead robber and his family should be viewed as "progressives?" Is it because the family is black? Or because their ethics are twisted? Are you claiming progressives commit more crimes than conservatives? In my own experience, my trust in a liberal hasn't been betrayed near as much as when I was silly enough to trust a republican... LOL

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Bob wrote:What happens if a black homeowner shoots and kills a black invader inside his home?  Does that make the black homeowner be a racist too?  Or is it only white homeowners protecting their homes who are automatically racists?

Bob:  There is no evidence that racism played any part in this robber shooting.  The racism I referred to in my thread was Markle's -- the way he reported the incident.  

Please be specific, precisely how was the way I "presented" the factual article...racist?

Here's the first line of the article you quoted:  "Relatives of a teenaged home invader who was killed by a homeowner while seemingly exiting the home he had broken into are asking observers to consider the mentality of children “raised in the hood.”

If the dead robber was "raised in the hood,"  he wasn't Asian, Latino, or White.  The primary reason you created this thread was to mock twisted black hood thinking.  Obviously, if the robber was white and poor, you wouldn't have given the story a second look.  

And now that I've been specific, how about you explaining why the dead robber and his family should be viewed as "progressives?"  Is it because the family is black?  Or because their ethics are twisted?  Are you claiming progressives commit more crimes than conservatives?  In my own experience, my trust in a liberal hasn't been betrayed near as much as when I was silly enough to trust a republican... LOL

I'd have posted it exactly the same but I bet you would not have gotten your panties in a twist.

I'd have referred to perpetrator and family as Progressives, just as I did here. The reason is simple, they now EXPECT handouts and to be supporteed.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Bob wrote:What happens if a black homeowner shoots and kills a black invader inside his home?  Does that make the black homeowner be a racist too?  Or is it only white homeowners protecting their homes who are automatically racists?

Bob:  There is no evidence that racism played any part in this robber shooting.  The racism I referred to in my thread was Markle's -- the way he reported the incident.  

Please be specific, precisely how was the way I "presented" the factual article...racist?

Here's the first line of the article you quoted:  "Relatives of a teenaged home invader who was killed by a homeowner while seemingly exiting the home he had broken into are asking observers to consider the mentality of children “raised in the hood.”

If the dead robber was "raised in the hood,"  he wasn't Asian, Latino, or White.  The primary reason you created this thread was to mock twisted black hood thinking.  Obviously, if the robber was white and poor, you wouldn't have given the story a second look.  

And now that I've been specific, how about you explaining why the dead robber and his family should be viewed as "progressives?"  Is it because the family is black?  Or because their ethics are twisted?  Are you claiming progressives commit more crimes than conservatives?  In my own experience, my trust in a liberal hasn't been betrayed near as much as when I was silly enough to trust a republican... LOL

I'd have posted it exactly the same but I bet you would not have gotten your panties in a twist.

I'd have referred to perpetrator and family as Progressives, just as I did here.  The reason is simple, they now EXPECT handouts and to be supporteed.

Not unlike the white trash hardcore conservatives who call themselves tea-partiers, and carry signs warning the government not to mess with their Medicare. LOL!

Vikingwoman



I'm surprised the homeowner hasn't been arrested for killing the kid.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Why? She had every right to defend herself. But Markle, the Nazi, would like for every Democrat to be a criminal. And, like Wordslinger said, most of the people who've done me wrong have been REPUBLICANS.

Markle

Markle

Vikingwoman wrote:I'm surprised the homeowner hasn't been arrested for killing the kid.

Hard for you to accept, I realize, a person is actually allowed to defend themselves and property with deadly force.

I KNOW! Can you imagine such a thing?

Vikingwoman



Depends on what state you're in Markle Farkle and what the circumstances are. If your life is not in danger and someone is trying to get away and unarmed you can't just execute them as their leaving. Happened a couple of years ago when two teens were robbing an old man and actually beat him. He shot one of them in the back as they were running down an ally and he was arrested.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


I'm glad you brought that case up, Viking, because I was thinking about it when I wrote about this one. But that wasn't ordinary circumstances (if there is such a thing). Ordinarily, people have a right to defend themselves...I would never argue against that. I just feel sorry for someone who is forced into that situation, because they will have to live with that fact...

Markle

Markle

Vikingwoman wrote:Depends on what state you're in Markle Farkle and what the circumstances are. If your life is not in danger and someone is trying to get away and unarmed you can't just execute them as their leaving. Happened a couple of years ago when two teens were robbing an old man and actually beat him. He shot one of them in the back as they were running down an ally and he was arrested.

As you know, I live in Florida. But, "frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" where I live. If someone has broken into my house, or tries to carjack me, I will shoot to kill. If there are consequences, I'll deal with them...ALIVE.

What was the "old man's" sentence and where did it happen?

Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'? Is this what Progressives have come too? Name%20calling%20cool_zpsuzoxfpxa

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Vikingwoman wrote:Depends on what state you're in Markle Farkle and what the circumstances are. If your life is not in danger and someone is trying to get away and unarmed you can't just execute them as their leaving. Happened a couple of years ago when two teens were robbing an old man and actually beat him. He shot one of them in the back as they were running down an ally and he was arrested.

As you know, I live in Florida.  But, "frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" where I live.  If someone has broken into my house, or tries to carjack me, I will shoot to kill.  If there are consequences, I'll deal with them...ALIVE.

What was the "old man's" sentence and where did it happen?

Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'? Is this what Progressives have come too? Name%20calling%20cool_zpsuzoxfpxa


Please show us where Florida or Federal Law permits a homeowner to shoot and kill a robber "in defense of property." Actually, the only legitimate way to shoot a robber or thief to death is if you can prove you are afraid for your life. Last time I looked, the law said you may not shoot to kill a thief who is running away with your TV.

Vikingwoman



You can't in most places kill someone if your life is not in danger. I am surprised about this story as the article says the kid was exiting through a window when he was shot. Unless your life is threatened you really can't use deadly force.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Relatives Of Killed 17-Year-Old Home Invader: How Else Is He 'Gonna Get His Money'? Is this what Progressives have come too?

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum