REPEAL OBAMACARE!!!
GOP 2016
KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
Wordslinger wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
War Hero hates poor sick people. Nuff said.
2seaoat wrote:Society benefits when everybody who drives a vehicle has insurance. Society benefits when ALL citizens have insurance. Society benefits when employers pay a living wage and the taxpayers do not have to pay the difference in the form of medicaid health care costs, housing, and food stamps.
It is a privilege to get to drive a car or have the government provide payment where there is no insurance and a person has a medical emergency. Why can't taxpayers demand that those privileges entail responsibility. You need auto insurance to drive. You need health insurance to avoid the Government picking up the tab. You need employers paying living wages which eliminates a large portion of the government paid health cost and shifts the same onto private sector companies under the affordable care act. These issues are simply too complex for some folks.
KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
It is forced. It's stupid law. If you aren't wanting to buy a product and want to assume the risk, why does the government force you? Hmmmm
boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
It is forced. It's stupid law. If you aren't wanting to buy a product and want to assume the risk, why does the government force you? Hmmmm
You are objectively wrong, but for the sake of humoring you lets assume for a second that the ACA forces everyone to buy health insurance.
Why isn't the rate of uninsured 0%?
Your "low information voter" status is showing, Karl.
Markle wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
It is forced. It's stupid law. If you aren't wanting to buy a product and want to assume the risk, why does the government force you? Hmmmm
You are objectively wrong, but for the sake of humoring you lets assume for a second that the ACA forces everyone to buy health insurance.
Why isn't the rate of uninsured 0%?
Your "low information voter" status is showing, Karl.
For the same reason people speed, rob banks and drive without insurance.
Many of those who have been forced to buy insurance cannot afford to use the insurance.
boards of FL wrote:Markle wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
It is forced. It's stupid law. If you aren't wanting to buy a product and want to assume the risk, why does the government force you? Hmmmm
You are objectively wrong, but for the sake of humoring you lets assume for a second that the ACA forces everyone to buy health insurance.
Why isn't the rate of uninsured 0%?
Your "low information voter" status is showing, Karl.
For the same reason people speed, rob banks and drive without insurance.
Many of those who have been forced to buy insurance cannot afford to use the insurance.
Perhaps I need to rephrase. KarlRove is making the claim that insurance coverage is required of everyone. He's objectively wrong. We can all choose to purchase insurance or not. If we choose to not purchase insurance, we will then pay a penalty.
Speeding is illegal. Robing banks is illegal. Driving without insurance is illegal.
Not having health insurance is not illegal. Why? Because we aren't legally required to have health insurance. That is why 11% of the population does not have health insurance. You understand this, right?
2seaoat wrote:if it wasn't illegal, then why is there a fine? nuf said. Put a cork in it.
Oh Oh.....Pace giving an opinion on what is legal.....so I took an early withdrawal from my IRA before I was 59 1/2 and paid a penalty of 10% and now I am a criminal......your cork long ago got lost.....so it keeps on spewing....and spewing.....and spewing and there is never nuf said.
boards of FL wrote:Markle wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
It is forced. It's stupid law. If you aren't wanting to buy a product and want to assume the risk, why does the government force you? Hmmmm
You are objectively wrong, but for the sake of humoring you lets assume for a second that the ACA forces everyone to buy health insurance.
Why isn't the rate of uninsured 0%?
Your "low information voter" status is showing, Karl.
For the same reason people speed, rob banks and drive without insurance.
Many of those who have been forced to buy insurance cannot afford to use the insurance.
Perhaps I need to rephrase. KarlRove is making the claim that insurance coverage is required of everyone. He's objectively wrong. We can all choose to purchase insurance or not. If we choose to not purchase insurance, we will then pay a penalty.
Speeding is illegal. Robing banks is illegal. Driving without insurance is illegal.
Not having health insurance is not illegal. Why? Because we aren't legally required to have health insurance. That is why 11% of the population does not have health insurance. You understand this, right?
KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:Markle wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:boards of FL wrote:KarlRove wrote:Forced insurance -of course the numbers will come down. Tyranny.
How many are actually using it though?
I think "affordable" is the word you were looking for, not "forced". No one is required to purchase health insurance under the ACA. You can simply go without and pay the penalty. If this were forced, the uninsured rate would be 0%, but it isn't, because no one is "forced" to purchase insurance.
So that's it? You - KarlRove - feel that it would be good policy to repeal the ACA and then watch the rate of uninsured skyrocket again? How is that optimal? Can you elaborate on how we would be better off with more people uninsured, and more people going to the ER for access to healthcare?
Let's hear it.
It is forced. It's stupid law. If you aren't wanting to buy a product and want to assume the risk, why does the government force you? Hmmmm
You are objectively wrong, but for the sake of humoring you lets assume for a second that the ACA forces everyone to buy health insurance.
Why isn't the rate of uninsured 0%?
Your "low information voter" status is showing, Karl.
For the same reason people speed, rob banks and drive without insurance.
Many of those who have been forced to buy insurance cannot afford to use the insurance.
Perhaps I need to rephrase. KarlRove is making the claim that insurance coverage is required of everyone. He's objectively wrong. We can all choose to purchase insurance or not. If we choose to not purchase insurance, we will then pay a penalty.
Speeding is illegal. Robing banks is illegal. Driving without insurance is illegal.
Not having health insurance is not illegal. Why? Because we aren't legally required to have health insurance. That is why 11% of the population does not have health insurance. You understand this, right?
if it wasn't illegal, then why is there a fine? nuf said. Put a cork in it.
Markle wrote:Not having health insurance is most certainly illegal.
boards of FL wrote:Markle wrote:Not having health insurance is most certainly illegal.
And yet another low information voter!
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum