Iran nuke questions unanswered

North Korea NEVER agreed to inspections. Ballistic missile development is the same development which allows commercial satellite launches. Iran does not need a 100 billion to support terrorism. It has done it quite well without the money. I go to Auto shows to look at concept cars, but that does not mean I can get one. The agreement restricts modern centrufuges. 97% of the stockpiled material will be gone. Iran wants to be able to profit off the material, Russia wanted it transferred to Russia, but the key to this detail is that Iran loses 97%. What restriction is on Israel to keep their nuclear weapons if a 1000 Palestinian civilians die from Israeli attacks on terrorists? What restrictions are on the United States after 100k civilian deaths in the iraqi war? The negotiations are about stopping Iran from development of Nuclear weapons. If it is in phases or all at once, Iran still has the option to be belligerent at any time, and the US STILL has military options. The timing matters little, however compliance does matter.

2seaoat wrote:North Korea NEVER agreed to inspections.  

Really?

"North Korea agrees to nuclear moratorium, IAEA inspections"

(Reuters) - North Korea agreed on Wednesday to stop nuclear tests, uranium enrichment and long-range missile launches, and to allow checks by nuclear inspectors, in an apparent policy shift that paves the way for resuming long-stalled disarmament talks.

The surprise breakthrough, announced simultaneously by the U.S. State Department and North Korea's official news agency, makes possible the resumption of six-nation nuclear negotiations with Pyongyang. It followed talks between U.S. and North Korean diplomats in Beijing last week.

"These are concrete measures that we consider a positive first step toward complete and verifiable denuclearization of the Korean peninsula in a peaceful manner," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

While analysts cautioned that Pyongyang has backtracked repeatedly on past deals, the moves by North Korea mark a sharp change in course, at least outwardly, by North Korea's reclusive leadership following the death in December of veteran leader Kim Jong-il.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/29/us-korea-north-usa-talks-idUSTRE81S13R20120229

Seaoat has his head up arse

Seaoat will defend anything Obama does.

KarlRove wrote:Seaoat will defend anything Obama does.

Maybe, but if Obama declared war against Iran tomorrow, you would find fault in it. You live to hate on the President.

He's a narcissist and would only do it for self Gain.

Iran isn't the country developing a nuclear ICBM threat, anyway.

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/budget/2015/04/08/north-korea-icbm-nuclear-weapon/25422795/

Which reflects back to the questions on the OP.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

KarlRove wrote:Seaoat will defend anything Obama does.

Maybe, but if Obama declared war against Iran tomorrow, you would find fault in it. You live to hate on the President.

Personally, I do not hate semi-retired President Obama. From what we can see, he seems to be a good husband and father. I don't know.

I do HATE what he has intentionally done to our country and status and reputation around the world. It will take decades to rectify what he has done to this nation.