You just can't make these things up.
This is what Progressives really believe would be best for America, UTOPIA as is said in this brilliant column in the NYT
Why Not Utopia?
MARCH 20, 2015
by Mark Bittman
[...]
But this assumes that people have work that pays a taxable income, and that’s not a safe assumption. Better is the Guaranteed Basic Income, which is not universally despised (it’s at least as old as Thomas Paine, was endorsed by the economist Friedrich Hayek and was recently considered by Switzerland), because it would simplify matters and help keep the economy moving. How all of this would be financed is of course a question; we could make the income tax look like it did 60 years ago, when the top rate was 91 percent (and, by the way, the economy was just fine), or we could institute a 100 percent tax on wealth over $1 billion, or ... well, there’s no dearth of ideas. The way to address income distribution is to redistribute income.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/opinion/sunday/why-not-utopia.html?_r=0
This is what Progressives really believe would be best for America, UTOPIA as is said in this brilliant column in the NYT
Why Not Utopia?
MARCH 20, 2015
by Mark Bittman
[...]
But this assumes that people have work that pays a taxable income, and that’s not a safe assumption. Better is the Guaranteed Basic Income, which is not universally despised (it’s at least as old as Thomas Paine, was endorsed by the economist Friedrich Hayek and was recently considered by Switzerland), because it would simplify matters and help keep the economy moving. How all of this would be financed is of course a question; we could make the income tax look like it did 60 years ago, when the top rate was 91 percent (and, by the way, the economy was just fine), or we could institute a 100 percent tax on wealth over $1 billion, or ... well, there’s no dearth of ideas. The way to address income distribution is to redistribute income.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/opinion/sunday/why-not-utopia.html?_r=0