Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again?

+3
othershoe1030
Floridatexan
boards of FL
7 posters

If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again?

If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again? I_vote_lcap56%If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again? I_vote_rcap 56% [ 9 ]
If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again? I_vote_lcap44%If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again? I_vote_rcap 44% [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 16


Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

boards of FL

boards of FL

If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again?


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

I'm fairly sure that he would win again, but I'd hate to see what the country would look like by the end of his third term.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

colaguy wrote:I'm fairly sure that he would win again, but I'd hate to see what the country would look like by the end of his third term.

Then you would REALLY HATE to see what either of his challengers in the last 2 national elections would have done to the country.

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

Floridatexan wrote:
colaguy wrote:I'm fairly sure that he would win again, but I'd hate to see what the country would look like by the end of his third term.

Then you would REALLY HATE to see what either of his challengers in the last 2 national elections would have done to the country.  

lol!

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

othershoe1030 wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
colaguy wrote:I'm fairly sure that he would win again, but I'd hate to see what the country would look like by the end of his third term.

Then you would REALLY HATE to see what either of his challengers in the last 2 national elections would have done to the country.  

lol!

LOL!!!

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
colaguy wrote:I'm fairly sure that he would win again, but I'd hate to see what the country would look like by the end of his third term.

Then you would REALLY HATE to see what either of his challengers in the last 2 national elections would have done to the country.  

Doubtful.  But we'll never know, will we.

knothead

knothead

Wordslinger wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
colaguy wrote:I'm fairly sure that he would win again, but I'd hate to see what the country would look like by the end of his third term.

Then you would REALLY HATE to see what either of his challengers in the last 2 national elections would have done to the country.  

lol!

LOL!!!

lol! lol!

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

If Romney had won we'd probably be seeing arguments about the merits or lack thereof of RomneyCare!
If McCain had won we'd likely be watching an invasion of Iran?

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

othershoe1030 wrote:If Romney had won we'd probably be seeing arguments about the merits or lack thereof of RomneyCare!
If McCain had won we'd likely be watching an invasion of Iran?

I think Romney would have attacked Iran, too. He wanted to greatly expand the very large military we now have.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:If Romney had won we'd probably be seeing arguments about the merits or lack thereof of RomneyCare!
If McCain had won we'd likely be watching an invasion of Iran?

I think Romney would have attacked Iran, too. He wanted to greatly expand the very large military we now have.

Not sure if Romney would have invaded Iran. But there is merit to a large military. The military was at great strength both physically and with hardware during the Cold War. Deterrent is a good thing. Not a shot fired. We, at the behest of of George H. W. Bush, began the downsize as he planned the new world order which has not worked. Only allowed the thug terrorists to stage their cat and mouse games.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

If presidents were allowed more than two terms, would Obama win again? Ec4da78631

Guest


Guest

Lol... exactly right teo. They were here all along... they just keep changing the name to placate the useful idiots.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:Lol... exactly right teo. They were here all along... they just keep changing the name to placate the useful idiots.


Just who are those communists who are taking over? And where are all the Fascists going?

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

McCarthy? Have you gone mad? Commies? WHERE?

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Let's see who owned all the factories in Mother Russia...The Communist Party

who owned all the factories in Italy  The fascists..

viva la difference !


It's all the same ole Chit...

It's like the coal mines my Grandpa worked in, they owned the Mines the stores the money and the workers....totalitarian

knothead

knothead

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Let's see who owned all the factories in Mother Russia...The Communist Party

who owned all the factories in Italy  The fascists..

viva la difference !


It's all the same ole Chit...

It's like the coal mines my Grandpa worked in, they owned the Mines the stores the money and the workers....totalitarian

It's a big club and you ain't in it . . . . . George Carlin

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Lol... exactly right teo. They were here all along... they just keep changing the name to placate the useful idiots.


Just who are those communists who are taking over? And where are all the Fascists going?

I see next to no differences between the modern progressives and the other collective ideologies... fascists included.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Lol... exactly right teo. They were here all along... they just keep changing the name to placate the useful idiots.


Just who are those communists who are taking over?  And where are all the Fascists going?

I see next to no differences between the modern progressives and the other collective ideologies... fascists included.


Do you hang out with Semi-sane Markle? He thinks Hitler was a socialist who hated communists. You should sign-up to drum for Ted Cruz. LOL

Guest


Guest

H. G. Wells, one of the most influential progressives of the 20th century, said in 1932 that progressives must become “liberal fascists” and “enlightened Nazis.” Regarding totalitarianism, he stated: “I have never been able to escape altogether from its relentless logic.” Calling for a “‘Phoenix Rebirth’ of Liberalism” under the umbrella of “Liberal Fascism,” Wells said: “I am asking for a Liberal Fascisti, for enlightened Nazis.”

The poet Wallace Stevens pronounced himself “pro-Mussolini personally.”

The eminent historian Charles Beard wrote of Mussolini’s efforts: “Beyond question, an amazing experiment is being made [in Italy], an experiment in reconciling individualism and socialism.”

Muckraking journalists almost universally admired Mussolini. Lincoln Steffens,for one, said that Italian fascism made Western democracy, by comparison, look like a system run by “petty persons with petty purposes.” Mussolini, Steffens proclaimed reverently, had been “formed” by God “out of the rib of Italy.”

McClure’s Magazine founder Samuel McClure, an important figure in the muckraking movement,described Italian fascism as “a great step forward and the first new ideal in government since the founding of the American Republic.”

After having vistited Italy and interviewed Mussolini in 1926, the American humorist Will Rogers, who was informally dubbed “Ambassador-at-Large of the United States” by the National Press Club, said of the fascist dictator: “I’m pretty high on that bird.” “Dictator form of government is the greatest form of government,” Rogers wrote, “that is, if you have the right dictator.”

Reporter Ida Tarbell was deeply impressed by Mussolini's attitudes regarding labor, affectionately dubbing him “a despot with a dimple.”

NAACP co-founder W. E. B. DuBois saw National Socialism as a worthy model for economic organization. The establishment of the Nazi dictatorship in Germany, he wrote, had been “absolutely necessary to get the state in order.” In 1937 DuBois stated: “there is today, in some respects, more democracy in Germany than there has been in years past.”

FDR adviser Rexford Guy Tugwell said of Italian fascism: “It's the cleanest,neatest,most efficiently operating piece of social machinery I've ever seen. It makes me envious.” In late 1934 he noted: “I find Italy doing many of the things which seem to me necessary.... Mussolini certainly has the same people opposed to him as FDR has.”

New Republic editor George Soule, who avidly supported FDR, noted approvingly that the Roosevelt administration was “trying out the economics of fascism.”

Playwright George Bernard Shaw hailed Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini as the world’s great “progressive” leaders because they “did things,” unlike the leaders of those “putrefying corpses” called parliamentary democracies.

The education reformer and socialist John Dewey spoke of the “social possibilities of war” and the “immense impetus to reorganization” that it afforded. He added,with an air of hopefulness,that the conflict might force Americans “to give up much of [their] economic freedom”; to abandon their “individualistic tradition” and “march in step”; and to recognize “the supremacy of public need over private possessions.”

The progressive financier George Perkins said the “great European war … is striking down individualism and building up collectivism.”

Mussolini in a 1921 speech: “Between us and the communists there are no political affinities but there are intellectual ones. Like you [communists], we consider necessary a centralized unitary state which imposes iron discipline and all persons, with this difference, that you reached this conclusion by way of the concept of class, and we by the way of the concept of nation.”

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions." Hitler 1927

boards of FL

boards of FL

OBAMA IS JUST A COMMUNIST EMPLOYING RIGHT WING TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS!!!111


When your base shares the collective IQ of an BBQ sauce...


_________________
I approve this message.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

boards of FL wrote:OBAMA IS JUST A COMMUNIST EMPLOYING RIGHT WING TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS!!!111


When your base shares the collective IQ of an BBQ sauce...
"AN" is used before a vowel...such as an idiot moderates the forum not a smart guy like PkrBum.

Guest


Guest

TEOTWAWKI wrote:
boards of FL wrote:OBAMA IS JUST A COMMUNIST EMPLOYING RIGHT WING TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS!!!111


When your base shares the collective IQ of an BBQ sauce...
"AN" is used before a vowel...such as an idiot moderates the forum not a smart guy like PkrBum.


lol!

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum