This is the same government that told me anthrax vaccines were not harmful. That I would have no side effects. Like many others I have had pulmonary embolisms once finished with the shot series .Coincidence ?
Not.
Not.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Joanimaroni wrote:You have to consider the incubation period.
PACEDOG#1 wrote:And if she was so brave why wasnt she toting an m-4
In Iraq and Astan?
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Why don't we just go up and lick an Ebola victim then sal???
Sal wrote:
Logic??
I'm the sole voice of logic in this thread, Gomer.
The rest of y'all are in a blind panic and suggesting measures that would do grave harm.
2seaoat wrote:How many people in America have died from Ebola?
If Public Health folks feel that a threat is reasonable, they will quarantine. However, the current hysteria has to catch up to the reality. America is not the hot zone. Western Africa is the hot zone and as we apply world assets to contain the virus, there most certainly will remain a slight chance of the virus coming to this nation. I trust the public health folks. I do not trust hysteria, because I saw hysteria in the AIDs crisis and I saw what that did to innocent victims of the disease like Ryan White. Those folks gripped in panic please go home tonight, turn on the night light, get a pacifier, and have somebody sing soft children songs to you until you fall asleep. Eventually, Butchmeup and the other panic peddlers will quit scaring you and reality will catch up to the panic.
boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
Sal wrote:Conspiratorial paranoia is easily the stupidest possible way to go about setting public policy around a medical issue, but by gawd, that seems to be exactly the direction terrified wingnutz, spoon-fed a steady diet of hysterical cable news stories, are demanding we go.
Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
So in turn you'd rather have that reversed and have no quarantines in effect to protect the population from exposure of a possible plague running rampant and killing more people in a few months or years than were ever killed by the flu.
boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
So in turn you'd rather have that reversed and have no quarantines in effect to protect the population from exposure of a possible plague running rampant and killing more people in a few months or years than were ever killed by the flu.
No. I'm showing you that your fear is misplaced and your suggested policy is flat out idiotic.
In one year, the flu will kill more human beings than ebola has ever killed...all time...ever. Why aren't you calling for a quarantine of everyone with the flu or of everyone who has potentially been exposed to the flu?
Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
So in turn you'd rather have that reversed and have no quarantines in effect to protect the population from exposure of a possible plague running rampant and killing more people in a few months or years than were ever killed by the flu.
No. I'm showing you that your fear is misplaced and your suggested policy is flat out idiotic.
In one year, the flu will kill more human beings than ebola has ever killed...all time...ever. Why aren't you calling for a quarantine of everyone with the flu or of everyone who has potentially been exposed to the flu?
Um.m..m... Because the flu doesn't have a estimated 70% kill rate like ebola and the latters kill rate is only that low with drastic measures like blood infusions. So if a nurse or doctor choose to go into a contaminated area and then has to spend a month in quarantine I really don't care. It was their choice to go.
*****CHUCKLE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVikZ8Oe_XA
Joanimaroni wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
So in turn you'd rather have that reversed and have no quarantines in effect to protect the population from exposure of a possible plague running rampant and killing more people in a few months or years than were ever killed by the flu.
No. I'm showing you that your fear is misplaced and your suggested policy is flat out idiotic.
In one year, the flu will kill more human beings than ebola has ever killed...all time...ever. Why aren't you calling for a quarantine of everyone with the flu or of everyone who has potentially been exposed to the flu?
Um.m..m... Because the flu doesn't have a estimated 70% kill rate like ebola and the latters kill rate is only that low with drastic measures like blood infusions. So if a nurse or doctor choose to go into a contaminated area and then has to spend a month in quarantine I really don't care. It was their choice to go.
*****CHUCKLE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVikZ8Oe_XA
Flu deaths have a high percentage of secondary conditions that cause death.
Damaged Eagle wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:boards of FL wrote:More people will die from the flu in this year alone than have ever died from ebola...ever...all years combined...going back to the origins of history of our civilization.
So in turn you'd rather have that reversed and have no quarantines in effect to protect the population from exposure of a possible plague running rampant and killing more people in a few months or years than were ever killed by the flu.
No. I'm showing you that your fear is misplaced and your suggested policy is flat out idiotic.
In one year, the flu will kill more human beings than ebola has ever killed...all time...ever. Why aren't you calling for a quarantine of everyone with the flu or of everyone who has potentially been exposed to the flu?
Um.m..m... Because the flu doesn't have a estimated 70% kill rate like ebola and the latters kill rate is only that low with drastic measures like blood infusions. So if a nurse or doctor choose to go into a contaminated area and then has to spend a month in quarantine I really don't care. It was their choice to go.
*****CHUCKLE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVikZ8Oe_XA
Flu deaths have a high percentage of secondary conditions that cause death.
Which are and how many people who contract the flu get these conditions?
*****SMILE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|