How did we ever get saddled with this lowlife piece of shit.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/04/07/harrys-reids-toxic-influence-on-politics/

The ends justify the means.

Reid is an experienced player and although a scumbag to some the sand box in which he plays is filled with much of the same types . . . . it is little wonder that Americans think more highly of Miley Cyrus than of our US Congress!

https://www.google.com/search?q=harry+reid+and+frank+rosenthal&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

This has nothing to do with democrat or republican horseshit. This piece of crap is just a conniving crook period.

From Daxton Brown's book published in 2010 HARRY: Money Mob & Influence In Harry Reid's Nevada

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's connections to money, mob and influence in Nevada going back fifty years. Revelations from Reid's first campaign manager and others paints a picture of a politician taking money on the side. Most shocking is the polygraph backed claim that Harry Reid took unreported donations from pimp Joe Conforte of the Mustang Ranch brothel in the years leading up to Reid's time on the Nevada Gaming Commission. Conforte's links to mob figures like Jimmy 'the Weasel' Fratianno and Johnny Simone mean the mob knew Reid was on the take. Also disturbing are accounts of Reid's long friendship with a lawyer to many of the most notorious strip clubs in Las Vegas - some of whose owners just did jail time for bribery and were Reid's political proteges. Oscar Goodman, Las Vegas Mayor and lawyer to the mob also enters the picture. Sweetheart treatment of land developers, the G-Sting scandal, fat cat campaign contributors and more taint the record of Senator Reid, one of the most powerful politicians in the U.S. and therefore the world.

Read this. It reveals how fucked up our political system is.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/may/20/harry-reid-vs-sheldon-adelson-who-holds-most-power/

I think good ol' Harry Reid is beginning to suffer dementia. It is becoming obvious.

This is nothing but a hit piece in an election year. Why do you take the word of a devotee of Ayn Rand? Try reading ATLAS SHRUGGED or THE FOUNTAINHEAD without gagging. I bet you can't.

Yep that's what the Washington Post is known for. Publishing hit pieces on democrats during election years.

Bob wrote:Yep that's what the Washington Post is known for.  Publishing hit pieces on democrats during election years.  

LOL.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/sectors/item/17261-washington-post-urged-to-disclose-new-owner-s-cia-ties

Friday, 27 December 2013 17:45
Washington Post Urged to Disclose New Owner’s CIA Ties

The Washington Post, one of the premier mouthpieces for the establishment, is facing a tsunami of criticism and calls for full disclosure after the newspaper’s new owner, Amazon CEO and Bilderberg luminary Jeff Bezos, secured a $600 million contract with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency for “cloud” services. According to critics, the Washington Post boss’s CIA ties represent a serious conflict of interest that, under basic ethical standards in journalism, must be disclosed to readers — at least whenever the paper is reporting on the “intelligence community” and its activities. So far, however, the Post has not publicly announced whether or not it will acknowledge what analysts say is a cut-and-dry conflict of interest.

Also troubling to critics of Bezos and his budding media empire is the billionaire’s intimate ties to the very pinnacle of the establishment. Bezos, for example, has in recent years become a regular attendee of the annual Bilderberg meetings. The deeply controversial and secretive gatherings feature top international figures in government, the establishment media, military, business, banking, royalty, intelligence, academia, and more. While the outfit is fiendishly obsessed with secrecy — its attendees claim they just want to discuss global issues in private — critics have long pointed to admissions from its luminaries to suggest that Bilderberg plays a crucial but largely hidden role in directing world trends.

Another controversy emerging around Bezos and his acquisition of the Post surrounds Amazon’s treatment of WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy group that helps whistleblowers expose government crimes by releasing secret documents. As the transparency organization was publishing U.S. State Department cables documenting myriad crimes and scandals, Amazon’s web services division infamously pulled the plug on WikiLeaks’ website. The extraordinarily controversial decision came shortly after politicians in Washington, D.C., such as Sen. Joe Lieberman, began hysterically melting down over the public exposure of their machinations.

The alternative media, of course, has seized on the conflict-of-interest story, citing the massive CIA contract with Amazon as yet another example of the establishment press run amok — Big Business and Big Government joining forces against the public. Experts in communications, media, and intelligence have also been slamming the paper and its owner for the controversial and shadowy dealings. As the public learns of the news, meanwhile, anger is growing as well. Tens of thousands of people have already signed a petition calling on the newspaper to provide full disclosure on its links to the shadowy espionage agency — especially when reporting on the CIA and related agencies or activities.

----------------------------