Undercover at an Idaho wolf derby

polecat wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

We could make them watch Fox & Friends... oh wait you said humane way.

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

Realistically, what is more humane than shooting them?  Same with coyotes and deer.

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

Realistically, what is more humane than shooting them?  Same with coyotes and deer.      

It is the way they're shooting them that is cruel.  The description in the article -- shooting them through the gut so it take a while for them to die, using armour piercing bullets, etc.  It takes a cowardly POS to purposely cause an animal to suffer.

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

Realistically, what is more humane than shooting them?  Same with coyotes and deer.      

It is the way they're shooting them that is cruel.  The description in the article -- shooting them through the gut so it take a while for them to die, using armour piercing bullets, etc.  It takes a cowardly POS to purposely cause an animal to suffer.

Why lie?  

They don't intentionally shoot them through the gut.  That was one hunter/farmer letting off steam.  NO WHERE in your article is the phrase "armor piercing bullets" used.

Tell us, do the cattle suffer when run down and killed by the coyotes and wolves?

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Boars are mean but no match for hungry dog packs. There's a reason shepherds use dogs to manage herds of animals. If there ever is a severe loss of power EMP or solar flare and people can't find food and turn out their dogs rather than watch the dogs starve , the dogs will become killers eating whatever and whoever they can find. They will work like a well trained platoon to catch people off guard and then kill and eat them. You can take the dog out of the wolf but you can't take the wolf out of the dog....

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

Realistically, what is more humane than shooting them?  Same with coyotes and deer.      

It is the way they're shooting them that is cruel.  The description in the article -- shooting them through the gut so it take a while for them to die, using armour piercing bullets, etc.  It takes a cowardly POS to purposely cause an animal to suffer.

Why lie?  

They don't intentionally shoot them through the gut.  That was one hunter/farmer letting off steam.  NO WHERE in your article is the phrase "armor piercing bullets" used.

Tell us, do the cattle suffer when run down and killed by the coyotes and wolves?

The very first sentence makes reference to armor piercing ammunition.  The wolves and coyote do not hunt cattle for sport, they do so to survive.  The wolves do not attack them in a way purposely designed to make the cattle suffer.  Do you think it is OK to cause an animal to suffer?

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

If the wolves need to be killed due to overpopulation, then it should be done in the most humane way.  

Realistically, what is more humane than shooting them?  Same with coyotes and deer.      

It is the way they're shooting them that is cruel.  The description in the article -- shooting them through the gut so it take a while for them to die, using armour piercing bullets, etc.  It takes a cowardly POS to purposely cause an animal to suffer.

Why lie?  

They don't intentionally shoot them through the gut.  That was one hunter/farmer letting off steam.  NO WHERE in your article is the phrase "armor piercing bullets" used.

Tell us, do the cattle suffer when run down and killed by the coyotes and wolves?

The very first sentence makes reference to armor piercing ammunition.  The wolves and coyote do not hunt cattle for sport, they do so to survive.  The wolves do not attack them in a way purposely designed to make the cattle suffer.  Do you think it is OK to cause an animal to suffer?

You are so gullible.  Little wonder you're a far left Progressive.

Your opinion piece, on an unknown site where you have to search the fine print for "About Us" and then it says nothing and is therefore useless.  

Gunz wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Boars are mean but no match for hungry dog packs. There's a reason shepherds use dogs to manage herds of animals. If there ever is a severe loss of power EMP or solar flare and people can't find food and turn out their dogs rather than watch the dogs starve , the dogs will become killers eating whatever and whoever they can find. They will work like a well trained platoon to catch people off guard and then kill and eat them. You can take the dog out of the wolf but you can't take the wolf out of the dog....

   Thats why I wont part with my pugs.  When the SHTF I'm gonna turn em out to hunt down and kill for me.  Never go hungry with my roving pack of killer pugs providing for me.

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

Interesting.  Why do you think there is a surplus of deer?

You're joking right?

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:In some areas of the country there is a surplus of wolves and coyotes and it is necessary for the number to be thinned.  This is the same as been done in areas of Alaska where there is an overpopulation of the predators.

In Connecticut they are opening more and more areas to deer hunting since they are severely overpopulated with deer.

Interesting.  Why do you think there is a surplus of deer?

You're joking right?

Nope.