We shall see
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-06/this-week-obamacare-finally-turned-the-corner?campaign_id=yhoo
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-06/this-week-obamacare-finally-turned-the-corner?campaign_id=yhoo
Go to page : 1, 2
Speak for yourself, pee-dog/KarlRove.PACEDOG#1 wrote:Those of us paying for it want it gone
If a person hasn't been seeing a doctor because the cost was prohibitive... I'll be interested to see how paying a monthly premium and then thousands in deductibles will help with that. You could say the millions added to medicaid will however... but that brings us back to free... and increased costs. It doesn't seem as if you're looking at the big picture.CarlSagan wrote:Speak for yourself, pee-dog/KarlRove.PACEDOG#1 wrote:Those of us paying for it want it gone
I want all Americans to see a doctor on a regular basis to help live healthier lives and thus reduce future healthcare costs.
I do not want to give away free healthcare anymore, it is too expensive. .
Oh, really?? Your powers of perception are quite strong if you can get that from these cute, little posts........NO, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT AS USUAL!!!!PACEDOG#1 wrote:
....and you Carl are one of the people with their hand out reaching and grabbing as much as you can while we still have the COWH.
I read the two articles. They were very interesting. Were you trying to bait certain posters with this thread?ppaca wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/what-if-obamacare-is-popu_b_4055256.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
CarlSagan wrote:Oh, really?? Your powers of perception are quite strong if you can get that from these cute, little posts........NO, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT AS USUAL!!!!PACEDOG#1 wrote:
....and you Carl are one of the people with their hand out reaching and grabbing as much as you can while we still have the COWH.
I have excellent health insurance, and it is not inexpensive. I am cool with that because I will not lose my house if I get stricken with cancer, or such.
See, that is the status quo you want to go back to, and I do not agree. So sad that you cannot get past your partisan prejudice to see objectively how this will have a positive impact on the health of our nation. So sad that you care more for your party than you do for your country.
Pathetically sad.
Thanks for nothing.
You caught me Z, it's fun.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:I read the two articles. They were very interesting. Were you trying to bait certain posters with this thread?ppaca wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/what-if-obamacare-is-popu_b_4055256.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
My daughter registered at the PPCA website in October, and printed out a long list of insurance plan possibilities for me to look at. She is currently insured by CIGNA, and I have been paying her premium. The costs of the PPCA possibilities were about in-line with the rate her CIGNA policy was increasing to in the next policy-year, so we didn't change anything. She has a new job that is part-time for 90 days, and if they offer her a full-time position after that, her employer will cover her under their group plan, and pay the premium. That will relieve me of having to cover her health insurance costs.
Then why has it failed in every other country is has been tried? More importantly, why do you demand we suffer such inferior health care?CarlSagan wrote:Oh, really?? Your powers of perception are quite strong if you can get that from these cute, little posts........NO, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT AS USUAL!!!!PACEDOG#1 wrote:
....and you Carl are one of the people with their hand out reaching and grabbing as much as you can while we still have the COWH.
I have excellent health insurance, and it is not inexpensive. I am cool with that because I will not lose my house if I get stricken with cancer, or such.
See, that is the status quo you want to go back to, and I do not agree. So sad that you cannot get past your partisan prejudice to see objectively how this will have a positive impact on the health of our nation. So sad that you care more for your party than you do for your country.
Pathetically sad.
Thanks for nothing.
As usual...Floridatexan has NOTHING!Floridatexan wrote:
How are those things good for our country?
You might consider asking yourself that question. How is your trolling really "good for our country"?
He probably meant to say 93% of wingnuts want it repealed......ppaca wrote:http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law
55% is a far cry from 93%
And since when do the politician's ever do what the people may want?
If it's such a great law then have your hero and martyr enforce it without any delays or changes right now.Floridatexan wrote:
Yes, the opposition to the PPACA is dead because it has been implemented, at least to some degree,...
If it's a benefit and right for the general public then shouldn't it be nationalized and available to all?Floridatexan wrote:...so now the burden is on the GOP to explain why they're trying to take away a benefit to the general public...
Again... If it's a benefit and right for the general public then shouldn't it be nationalized and available to all?Floridatexan wrote:...especially those who could not previously qualify for health insurance or who paid big bucks for lousy coverage or who were denied coverage when they got sick.
So you have a problem with free speech and peaceful dissent from those who oppose your glorious health care law... Go figure.Floridatexan wrote:And the rollout would have been much more successful if the tighty righties hadn't tried to repeal it 46 times at a cost of approximately $50 million and fought it in the courts...at who knows what cost...and instead put that energy into implementing state plans to take advantage of the initial cost savings and actually produce a benefit for the majority of people...or instead of trying to compare the new law to the Iraq War...WTH?
Last edited by Damaged Eagle on 12/8/2013, 4:42 pm; edited 2 times in total
So why don't you just have your hero and martyr nationalize the health care system and put all of it's employees on the military pay scale then make health care available to all.Floridatexan wrote:
How are those things good for our country?
Yep! You sure should.Floridatexan wrote:You might consider asking yourself that question.
Floridatexan wrote:How is your trolling really "good for our country"?
You should change your screen name to "FloridaTexan-Lame". You've earned it!Floridatexan wrote:
Yes, the opposition to the PPACA is dead because it has been implemented, at least to some degree, so now the burden is on the GOP to explain why they're trying to take away a benefit to the general public...especially those who could not previously qualify for health insurance or who paid big bucks for lousy coverage or who were denied coverage when they got sick. And the rollout would have been much more successful if the tighty righties hadn't tried to repeal it 46 times at a cost of approximately $50 million and fought it in the courts...at who knows what cost...and instead put that energy into implementing state plans to take advantage of the initial cost savings and actually produce a benefit for the majority of people...or instead of trying to compare the new law to the Iraq War...WTH?
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|