Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST LIES

+7
2seaoat
Floridatexan
knothead
ZVUGKTUBM
PBulldog2
boards of FL
VectorMan
11 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Guest


Guest

VectorMan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
VectorMan wrote:LOL

I knew their little heads would explode. Very, very predictable.

They know they lie. We know they lie. They know we know they lie. But, in the end they believe the lies. Pretty sad for that 20%.

Time and votes will tell.
Did you even read the article from PACEDOG's thread that I linked?  

1)  Read the article that you posted.

2)  Read the article that I linked that PACEDOG posted.

3)  Realize that the article that you posted is describing the article that PACEDOG posted.

4)  Welcome to the end of the thought process.


Somehow I doubt you'll make it all the way to 4).
I read what I posted. It's a very good description of how liberals lie through their teeth and get uninformed/underinformed voters to believe their BS.

I've read the link you posted from PACEDOG. Didn't really need to. I know your use of circular logic. The article I posted may well have described the article PACEDOG posted, but it really doesn't matter for the big picture. Liberals are proven liars. Thus, don't trust what they say. They are masters of circular logic and lies.

There is no end to the thought process. You may come to a conclusion but that in no way means that it is the end of the thought process. I learned that while in college and will never forgot it.

College is also where I learned about "circular logic" or "circular reasoning", and your's makes most of your premises flawed or false.


circular logic: a use of reason in which the premises depends on or is equivalent to the conclusion, a method of false logic by which "this is used to prove that, and that is used to prove this".
How's that republican rhetoric working for ya, Vector? Have you been embraced by your fellow repugs when they start talking about how your gay ass is gonna burn in hell? Do you feel the love? Get you some more of that and then we'll talk about logic. LOL!

boards of FL

boards of FL

PACEDOG#1 wrote:You and your crowd are up in arms over everything that doesn't paint Obama as the savior.
If you aren't able to see any connection between V-man's article, and your posting of an article that claims that martial law and an army that is willing to fire on US citizens is an eminent threat....well....hahahahahaha....


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

PkrBum wrote:
It's not funny when you fail to use standards... it's pathetic. It was a learned behavior.
Guy who doesn't grasp the meaning of "taxes", "increasing", and "long term" is telling me that I don't use "standards".


_________________
I approve this message.

2seaoat



Translation: In spite of empirical facts that say otherwise, I chose to believe that tax rates are increasing.


Ok, then. I can't really argue with that.


Therein lies the problem where an intelligent poster repeatedly is afraid to actually discuss facts, and retreats in this utopian dogma of absolutes. It is simply a chirp here and a chirp there, but no cohesive argument or theory to back what he has in his little magic box.....where logic and free market mechanism will magically replace government. Maybe you can get an honest discussion with him.....he simply gets mad with me.....but that line is long.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:You and your crowd are up in arms over everything that doesn't paint Obama as the savior.
If you aren't able to see any connection between V-man's article, and your posting of an article that claims that martial law and an army that is willing to fire on US citizens is an eminent threat....well....hahahahahaha....
What was posted is to get people wondering why all of these top generals, and we can start with McChrystal, getting fired and most of these guys could have pretty much "shut up and played the game" to keep their jobs and did not. Why is that? Doesn't it bother you that we're running off guys who have their stuff in one bag and replacing them with a lot of asskissing politician types who rode a desk to their rank and not with their actual ability to lead?

Let me tell you this...neither one of us want martial law, I promise that to you. You'll have no rights at all and the rest of us that do, will still be walking on egg shells. My ex is a cop and she was on duty during Ivan and the aftermath. She was all for martial law mainly because the Army would have come in an taken all the responsibility off of her at the cost of her losing her own authority as an LEO. She didn't get it then and still doesn't now. The military IS NOT a police force for civilians...neither HERE nor places like Iraq and Astan (of which your savior said was a "worthy fight"). The military is for DESTROYING and BREAKING things. If and when that ever occurs people like you are going to bitch the loudest and cry the most and this very board will more than likely cease to exist through the use of EW.

I doubt you'll find too many active and reserve military willing to fire on Americans. I can't ever see that being a lawful order personally. The suggestion was that maybe the powers that be are vetting current leadership with that very question and they just keep rifling through people til they get the YES MAN or WOMAN they want. Shooting at people in foreign countries when they are a perceived threat is one thing, shooting at AMERICANS because the government officials might feel threatened will be a whole different issue. Military members first take an oath to defend the Constitution FIRST and FOREMOST, not the elected officials around them.

Markle

Markle

PBulldog2 wrote:Meh....I still blame the tea party Republicans for the government shutdown.
Why? Because President Barack Hussein Obama refused any debt ceiling at all in a final bill.

In other words, the President could just raise it at will as far as HE deemed necessary. So long country.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Markle wrote:
PBulldog2 wrote:Meh....I still blame the tea party Republicans for the government shutdown.
Why?  Because President Barack Hussein Obama refused any debt ceiling at all in a final bill.

In other words, the President could just raise it at will as far as HE deemed necessary.  So long country.
The President was right not to negotiate the already negotiated...and challenged...and upheld.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PACEDOG#1 wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:You and your crowd are up in arms over everything that doesn't paint Obama as the savior.
If you aren't able to see any connection between V-man's article, and your posting of an article that claims that martial law and an army that is willing to fire on US citizens is an eminent threat....well....hahahahahaha....

What was posted is to get people wondering why all of these top generals, and we can start with McChrystal, getting fired and most of these guys could have pretty much "shut up and played the game" to keep their jobs and did not. Why is that? Doesn't it bother you that we're running off guys who have their stuff in one bag and replacing them with a lot of asskissing politician types who rode a desk to their rank and not with their actual ability to lead?

Did you actually read the interview ROLLING STONE did with McChrystal? His open criticism of the CIC was completely out of line...I believe they call that "conduct unbecoming an officer".

Let me tell you this...neither one of us want martial law, I promise that to you. You'll have no rights at all and the rest of us that do, will still be walking on egg shells. My ex is a cop and she was on duty during Ivan and the aftermath. She was all for martial law mainly because the Army would have come in an taken all the responsibility off of her at the cost of her losing her own authority as an LEO. She didn't get it then and still doesn't now. The military IS NOT a police force for civilians...neither HERE nor places like Iraq and Astan (of which your savior said was a "worthy fight"). The military is for DESTROYING and BREAKING things. If and when that ever occurs people like you are going to bitch the loudest and cry the most and this very board will more than likely cease to exist through the use of EW.

I doubt you'll find too many active and reserve military willing to fire on Americans. I can't ever see that being a lawful order personally. The suggestion was that maybe the powers that be are vetting current leadership with that very question and they just keep rifling through people til they get the YES MAN or WOMAN they want. Shooting at people in foreign countries when they are a perceived threat is one thing, shooting at AMERICANS because the government officials might feel threatened will be a whole different issue. Military members first take an oath to defend the Constitution FIRST and FOREMOST, not the elected officials around them.
The idea that Barack Obama would vet military command based on the criteria of firing on American citizens is ludicrous. Bush would have and most likely did kill American citizens for political gain and his God-blessed legacy. McCain would have started a war with Iran; Romney had no compunction about kissing Israeli ass. But you've got nothing but rumor and innuendo to back up your assertions. And you are demonstrating exactly why some officers had to go.

Guest


Guest

THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST LIES - Page 2 1378501_603213456382999_273194741_n

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

PACEDOG#1 wrote:THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST LIES - Page 2 1378501_603213456382999_273194741_n
I think that poster was meant for you......

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

Floridatexan wrote:
VectorMan wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
VectorMan wrote:LOL

I knew their little heads would explode. Very, very predictable.

They know they lie. We know they lie. They know we know they lie. But, in the end they believe the lies. Pretty sad for that 20%.

Time and votes will tell.
And PeeDog wonders why I use terms like "Reich wing".  That 20% you refer to...wrong party...that would be the increasingly irrelevant Greedy Ol' Pigs.

Do you even know how to look up truthful things on the internet?

Good Lord save us from the uninformed and ignorant.
I was a banker and a proofreader, among other things.  I also have a degree in marketing.  Would you care to try and match that?  Let's hear your blankin' credentials.

Barack Hussein Obama has a law degree from Aarvard and was a community organizer. That was his level of competency. Everything beyond that has proven to be BEYOND his level of competency.

Remember the Peter Principal? They could have written the book about President Obama. Look at the catastrophe in the Oval Office.

AP

IRS

Benghazi

Fast and Furious

ObamaCare

NSA

What else do you need?

boards of FL

boards of FL

And this about does it for this thread. If you guys could only see how completely backwards and desperate your worldviews are.

http://www.vice.com/read/the-best-little-hell-house-in-texas


"Yeah! Like! Liberals scare people into believing stuff! But aside from that, did you hear about Obama's army that is going to wage war against the US? He's planning on using nukes as well! Martial law is coming! Oh, and if you're gay, that means you will either die of aids or commit suicide, and the burn in hell for eternity. (Speaks in tongues for awhile). Don't have premarital sex or you will turn in to a prostitute! But , seriously, why do liberals make up hysterical bullshit to scare people with all the time? They're like, so dumb! Soo sooooo soooooooo dumb. Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb,"


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

VectorMan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
VectorMan wrote:LOL

I knew their little heads would explode. Very, very predictable.

They know they lie. We know they lie. They know we know they lie. But, in the end they believe the lies. Pretty sad for that 20%.

Time and votes will tell.
Did you even read the article from PACEDOG's thread that I linked?  

1)  Read the article that you posted.

2)  Read the article that I linked that PACEDOG posted.

3)  Realize that the article that you posted is describing the article that PACEDOG posted.

4)  Welcome to the end of the thought process.


Somehow I doubt you'll make it all the way to 4).
I read what I posted. It's a very good description of how liberals lie through their teeth and get uninformed/underinformed voters to believe their BS.

I've read the link you posted from PACEDOG. Didn't really need to. I know your use of circular logic. The article I posted may well have described the article PACEDOG posted, but it really doesn't matter for the big picture. Liberals are proven liars. Thus, don't trust what they say. They are masters of circular logic and lies.

There is no end to the thought process. You may come to a conclusion but that in no way means that it is the end of the thought process. I learned that while in college and will never forgot it.

College is also where I learned about "circular logic" or "circular reasoning", and your's makes most of your premises flawed or false.


circular logic: a use of reason in which the premises depends on or is equivalent to the conclusion, a method of false logic by which "this is used to prove that, and that is used to prove this".

You're an idiot. Seriously.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

Nah boards, your ilk are the idiots.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PACEDOG#1 wrote:More slander and no substance....as usual FT>
Bug off, whiner.  This entire thread is just another attempt by idiots like you to slander Democrats.  You lost the last 2 elections and you're GOING TO LOSE the next one.  So......

THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST LIES - Page 2 $(KGrHqRHJE0FCse0M0BSBQwEvM2hl!~~60_35

Guest


Guest

Whiner? FT the only ones whining are your minions who can no longer defend the most incompetent POTUS to ever hold office in the history of the nation. Sucks to be y'all lololo lol

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Whiner? FT the only ones whining are your minions who can no longer defend the most incompetent POTUS to ever hold office in the history of the nation. Sucks to be y'all lololo lol
You don't get the last word here, loser.

boards of FL

boards of FL

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Nah boards, your ilk are the idiots.

I'm actually happy to see you say that. For the most part, I try and be cordial with everyone on this forum. But this shit that you and V-man post here in recent times, it borderlines on standing around in a real life situation and watching old white dudes slinging n-bombs. You really are a fucking idiot.

I realize this is far beyond your grasp, but you just posted a thread on a public forum which implies that martial law is just around the corner, and that Obama is fostering an army that only consists of soldiers who are perfectly fine with firing on US citizens. Meanwhile, your boy V-man is posting a thread about how psychologically bankrupt "liberals" are, and how they consistently fall prey to hysterical claims that use threats as a vehicle for brainwashing. Are you at all capable of connecting dots?

Now, to any sane person, these two occurrences render you both as being seriously moronic fucking idiots. I know this sounds incredibly harsh, but reality is harsh.

P-dog, from what I gather based upon what information you have publicly provided about yourself, you have worked in the military for almost two decades, and were at some point a public educator. I wonder if you have ever even cashed a paycheck that wasn't given to you by some form of government. For most of your life, government has told you where to live, what time to go to bed and get up in the morning, how long your hair can be, how to dress, where to be and when. Honestly, the government probably has steered your life more than you have. And in spite of all that, you come to this forum and post shit like this:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Why do we have to have government always telling us what we can and cannot do?
Are you seriously that unaware of reality that you don't see the irony in a statement like that? Are you really so dumb that you can sift through the completely BS article that you recently posted, and that I sourced earlier in this thread, and not at least acknowledge that it is nothing more than a scare tactic?

At least people like DE and Pkr have a slight bit of charm in their completely ignorant chime-ins on this forum. At least they are even slightly likable. You and V-man are simply ignorant assholes, with absolutely no redeeming value at all as far as I can see.

And there you have it.


_________________
I approve this message.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Ooh..... This thread is really starting to rumble...... Razz 

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Sal

Sal

boards of FL wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Nah boards, your ilk are the idiots.
I'm actually happy to see you say that.  For the most part, I try and be cordial with everyone on this forum.  But this shit that you and V-man post here in recent times, it borderlines on standing around in a real life situation and watching old white dudes slinging n-bombs.  You really are a fucking idiot.

I realize this is far beyond your grasp, but you just posted a thread on a public forum which implies that martial law is just around the corner, and that Obama is fostering an army that only consists of soldiers who are perfectly fine with firing on US citizens.  Meanwhile,  your boy V-man is posting a thread about how psychologically bankrupt "liberals" are, and how they consistently fall prey to hysterical claims that use threats as a vehicle for brainwashing.  Are you at all capable of connecting dots?

Now, to any sane person, these two occurrences render you both as being seriously moronic fucking idiots.  I know this sounds incredibly harsh,  but reality is harsh.  

P-dog, from what I gather based upon what information you have publicly provided about yourself, you have worked in the military for almost two decades, and were at some point a public educator.  I wonder if you have ever  even cashed a paycheck that wasn't given to you by some form of government.  For most of your life, government has told you where to live, what time to go to bed and get up in the morning, how long your hair can be, how to dress, where to be and when.  Honestly, the government probably has steered your life more than you have.  And in spite of all that, you come to this forum and post shit like this:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Why do we have to have government always telling us what we can and cannot do?
Are you seriously that unaware of reality that you don't see the irony in a statement like that?  Are you really so dumb that you can sift through the completely BS article that you recently posted, and that I sourced earlier in this thread, and not at least acknowledge that it is nothing more than a scare tactic?

At least people like DE and Pkr have a slight bit of charm in their completely ignorant chime-ins on this forum.  At least they are even slightly likable.  You and V-man are simply ignorant assholes, with absolutely no redeeming value at all as far as I can see.  

And there you have it.

Wow ...

... now, that was A LOT of fun to read.

Well put.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Nah boards, your ilk are the idiots.
I'm actually happy to see you say that.  For the most part, I try and be cordial with everyone on this forum.  But this shit that you and V-man post here in recent times, it borderlines on standing around in a real life situation and watching old white dudes slinging n-bombs.  You really are a fucking idiot.

I realize this is far beyond your grasp, but you just posted a thread on a public forum which implies that martial law is just around the corner, and that Obama is fostering an army that only consists of soldiers who are perfectly fine with firing on US citizens.  Meanwhile,  your boy V-man is posting a thread about how psychologically bankrupt "liberals" are, and how they consistently fall prey to hysterical claims that use threats as a vehicle for brainwashing.  Are you at all capable of connecting dots?

Now, to any sane person, these two occurrences render you both as being seriously moronic fucking idiots.  I know this sounds incredibly harsh,  but reality is harsh.  

P-dog, from what I gather based upon what information you have publicly provided about yourself, you have worked in the military for almost two decades, and were at some point a public educator.  I wonder if you have ever  even cashed a paycheck that wasn't given to you by some form of government.  For most of your life, government has told you where to live, what time to go to bed and get up in the morning, how long your hair can be, how to dress, where to be and when.  Honestly, the government probably has steered your life more than you have.  And in spite of all that, you come to this forum and post shit like this:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Why do we have to have government always telling us what we can and cannot do?
Are you seriously that unaware of reality that you don't see the irony in a statement like that?  Are you really so dumb that you can sift through the completely BS article that you recently posted, and that I sourced earlier in this thread, and not at least acknowledge that it is nothing more than a scare tactic?

At least people like DE and Pkr have a slight bit of charm in their completely ignorant chime-ins on this forum.  At least they are even slightly likable.  You and V-man are simply ignorant assholes, with absolutely no redeeming value at all as far as I can see.  

And there you have it.
THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST LIES - Page 2 9k=

If our chime-ins are so ignorant then why do you and others refuse to engage those chime-ins in a reasonable discussion?

Let's discuss some of these pressing social issues that you supposedly enlightened progressive liberals say are so important in a reasonable manner.

Unless you're scared that those chime-ins might sway the masses of moderates to look at things from a different point of view.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-R8gHj_7v8

Very Happy

boards of FL

boards of FL

Damaged Eagle wrote:If our chime-ins are so ignorant then why do you and others refuse to engage those chime-ins in a reasonable discussion?

For the same reason I don't get into a discussion with a child if they call me a dummy.


_________________
I approve this message.

dumpcare



Well you can't have it both ways, "Why is government telling us what to do" and then you love it when they impose smoking bans, marijuana bans, legalized gambling. So you all just pick a choose what the government can regulate in our life's?

Nekochan

Nekochan

Let's be fair now.  When Bush was president, there were some liberals (maybe even some members of this forum!) who said that Bush would cancel the 2008 election because he did not want to relinquish power, that Bush planned 9/11 and other completely ridiculous stories.   Are the people who said these things also idiots?

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:If our chime-ins are so ignorant then why do you and others refuse to engage those chime-ins in a reasonable discussion?
For the same reason I don't get into a discussion with a child if they call me a dummy.
THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST LIES - Page 2 Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXZjozRbTHAXlbD5cFj49N-S6beCVkZQJ0kfyixuJB6M49euxkmg

I've never called you a dummy, stupid, idiot, moron, etc... I find it interesting that you would think that way about your supposedly enlightened liberal friends though.  

On the other hand I have suggested you as a possible date for Sal who unfortunately for you prefers little boys.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0DAnu5Sq6k

Very Happy

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum