Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » General Discussion » The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11

+4
ImpishScoundrel
TEOTWAWKI
2seaoat
Hospital Bob
8 posters

Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 4]

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

This is a photo of the South Tower of the WTC at the moment it began to collapse.


The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 September-9-11-attacks-anniversary-ground-zero-world-trade-center-pentagon-flight-93-collapsing-tower_40003_600x450


The Illuminatti flew an airliner traveling at over 500 mph into the side of the building.
The collapse began at exactly the spot where the airliner struck the building.
So why is this so amazing? Well it's because when the Illuminatti planned this thing, they could not have known the exact level of where the airliner traveling at 500 mph would hit the building. And they realized of course that if the collapse began at a different level than the one the airliner impacted it would look very suspicious.
That means they had to plant bombs at many different levels in the skyscraper and have the ability to select whatever level they needed the bombs to detonate.

But their skill gets even a lot more amazing. Remember they had to prepare all this without being detected by the thousands of workers and visitors and security personel inside the building. Because they knew full well that if anyone had seen anything suspicious happening, that once 9/11 had occurred those persons would have reported seeing that. And no one in 12 years has reported seeing anything unusual or suspicious.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

This photo was taken as the North Tower was collapsing. As you can see the debris from the North Tower is falling into the south face of WTC 7.

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 Wtc-069_003

These photos show the extent of the damage to WTC 7.

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 Confronto_eng

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 Wtc-7_note

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 Image3_small

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 Wtc-110_z_03_bw_02_small

2seaoat



It is the absolute lack of logic in the conspiracy theories which get passed over as folks focus on detail which cannot be logically connected from the very first impression of the incident.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

It's okay guys if they could convince you that they landed on the moon in that POS lunar lander and returned numerous times... well...you will believe anything. So I won't disturb your little neurons any further with empirical facts.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I'm curious to learn something. Is there anyone reading this besides teo who thinks the government faked the moon landings and they never happened?

2seaoat



I have been to the moon several times, and am pissed with the littering.

ImpishScoundrel

ImpishScoundrel

Bob wrote:I'm curious to learn something. Is there anyone reading this besides teo who thinks the government faked the moon landings and they never happened?

Uh, no?

Sorry Teo, They really did land on the moon. Mythbusters confirmed it.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

ImpishScoundrel wrote: Mythbusters confirmed it.
But can you prove Mythbusters is not working for the Illuminatti? Because when Popular Mechanics attempted to debunk the conspiracy theories we couldn't prove that Popular Mechanics wasn't working for the Illuminatti either. And unless it can be proven otherwise, every organization which does not agree with the conspiracy theory is automatically working for the Illuminatti.

2seaoat



Well, it is pretty obvious to me that honorable men with impeccable character said they were there......plus........why has not one person in the program stood up and say.....I was never there? That person would write a book and become an instant celebrity making millions......instead all these honorable characters simply fade away never telling T's story. Again, logic is where you must begin and end a discussion of a conspiracy. It makes no logical sense to fake a moon landing.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

2seaoat wrote:Well, it is pretty obvious to me that honorable men with impeccable character said they were there......plus........why has not one person in the program stood up and say.....I was never there? That person would write a book and become an instant celebrity making millions......instead all these honorable characters simply fade away never telling T's story. Again, logic is where you must begin and end a discussion of a conspiracy. It makes no logical sense to fake a moon landing.

Teo believes Armstrong and Aldrin and all the others were convinced to be accomplices in one of the biggest frauds in history by convincing them it was in the nation's interest to do so because we needed to win the space race competition with the Soviets.
In other words, they did it for patriotism.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Aldrin was the best actor of all. When someone accused him of it this is how he handled it.

Sal

Sal

9/11 and the moon landing are fun conspiracy theories, although I have to say as outlandish as those theories are, somehow they don't offend me as much as the theory that the people mutilated in Boston were "crisis actors".

Not sure exactly why, but that one takes the cake for me.

ImpishScoundrel

ImpishScoundrel

Bob wrote:
ImpishScoundrel wrote: Mythbusters confirmed it.
But can you prove Mythbusters is not working for the Illuminatti? Because when Popular Mechanics attempted to debunk the conspiracy theories we couldn't prove that Popular Mechanics wasn't working for the Illuminatti either. And unless it can be proven otherwise, every organization which does not agree with the conspiracy theory is automatically working for the Illuminatti.

Then, I'm working for the Illuminatti?

il·lu·mi·na·ti. Very cool! Rolls off the tongue very nicely I think.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I just spotted this video. This one is the minute and a half of what happened before Buzz Aldrin punched the guy showing what led up to him doing it.

Also, as you can see from the first blog comment below the video, the guy who was harrassing Aldrin is queer so this may be the first time Teo is proud to have the same ideas as a queer. lol



Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

But I must say I'm a little confused because it's unusual for a queer to carry a bible around and talk about repenting since the Bible says being queer is sinful.
Go figure.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

ImpishScoundrel wrote:

Then, I'm working for the Illuminatti?

il·lu·mi·na·ti. Very cool! Rolls off the tongue very nicely I think.

Almost as nicely as il·lu·mi·nutty.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Never before or since have three steel reinforced buildings "collapsed" due to fire...not a single one, yet on that day there were three. Any fool can plainly see that the buildings did not "collapse", but exploded from within. The "pancake theory" provided by NIST is physically impossible, given the near-freefall speed at which the buildings fell. Concrete was pulverized, as were office furnishings, and steel melted out the windows. Evidence of thermite was found in dust several blocks away. Contrary to your statement, Bob, several witnesses, including firefighters and security, reported hearing explosions prior to the impact of the planes on the buildings, coming from the basement levels. Maybe the most damning of all evidence was the fact that the debris, mostly steel, was removed from the scene and shipped out of the country.

The 9/11 Commission was formed almost 2 years later, with Bush choosing Henry Kissinger to lead it, but that was a no-go because of public opposition. Bush and Cheney would only appear before the commission together and in secrecy. The commission was "spoon-fed" selected "evidence". The Patriot Act and Dept. of Homeland Security appeared out of thin air and have been with us ever since.

I honestly don't know how anyone could believe the official story, so we know we've been lied to...and where there's one lie, there are more lies.

Sal

Sal

Floridatexan wrote:Never before or since have three steel reinforced buildings "collapsed" due to fire...not a single one, yet on that day there were three. Any fool can plainly see that the buildings did not "collapse", but exploded from within. The "pancake theory" provided by NIST is physically impossible, given the near-freefall speed at which the buildings fell. Concrete was pulverized, as were office furnishings, and steel melted out the windows. Evidence of thermite was found in dust several blocks away. Contrary to your statement, Bob, several witnesses, including firefighters and security, reported hearing explosions prior to the impact of the planes on the buildings, coming from the basement levels. Maybe the most damning of all evidence was the fact that the debris, mostly steel, was removed from the scene and shipped out of the country.

The 9/11 Commission was formed almost 2 years later, with Bush choosing Henry Kissinger to lead it, but that was a no-go because of public opposition. Bush and Cheney would only appear before the commission together and in secrecy. The commission was "spoon-fed" selected "evidence". The Patriot Act and Dept. of Homeland Security appeared out of thin air and have been with us ever since.

I honestly don't know how anyone could believe the official story, so we know we've been lied to...and where there's one lie, there are more lies.


What about the moon landing?

Where you at on that one?

ImpishScoundrel

ImpishScoundrel

Bob wrote:
ImpishScoundrel wrote:

Then, I'm working for the Illuminatti?

il·lu·mi·na·ti. Very cool! Rolls off the tongue very nicely I think.

Almost as nicely as il·lu·mi·nutty.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with being nutty. It helps to keep the stress and ulcers away.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Floridatexan wrote: Contrary to your statement, Bob, several witnesses, including firefighters and security, reported hearing explosions prior to the impact of the planes on the buildings, coming from the basement levels.
That makes it all even a lot more amazing. Because that would mean that explosives were detonated in the basement. And not only were they detonated in the basement, they were detonated in the basement about an hour before the buildings collapsed.

Firstly, no building has ever been imploded with explosives which were detonated an hour before the building collapsed. The implosion ALWAYS occurs within seconds of the explosions going off.
Secondly, we have an enormous amount of indisputable photographic evidence (both still and video) which clearly shows the collapse of each building began at the level each building was struck by the airliner.
So to make a collapse happen at those levels by setting off bombs in the basement defies every law of common sense there is.

Also, no one has ever been able to produce any actual evidence that either thermite or molten steel was ever present. Those are just foolish claims made by foolish people.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Floridatexan wrote:NeThe "pancake theory" provided by NIST is physically impossible, given the near-freefall speed at which the buildings fell. to...and where there's one lie, there are more lies.


The buildings did not fall at free-fall speeds.

In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11 Pulledin

Guest


Guest

Also, no one has ever been able to produce any actual evidence that either thermite or molten steel was ever present. Those are just foolish claims made by foolish people.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

hallmarkgrad2 wrote:



http://911myths.com/html/wtc_molten_steel.html

Guest


Guest

The buildings did not fall at free-fall speeds.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

This is from the report of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, hallmark. It had a team of engineers and scientists do an exhaustive year long study on how the buildings collapsed...
_______________________________________

QUESTION:

In a video, it appears that WTC 7 is descending in free fall, something that would not occur in the structural collapse that you describe. How can you ignore basic laws of physics?

ANSWER:

In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf), NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions. During the public comment period on the draft report, NIST was asked to confirm this time difference and define the reasons for it in greater detail.

To further clarify the descent of the north face, NIST recorded the downward displacement of a point near the center of the roofline from first movement until the north face was no longer visible in the video. Numerical analyses were conducted to calculate the velocity and acceleration of the roofline point from the time-dependent displacement data. The instant at which vertical motion of the roofline first occurred was determined by tracking the numerical value of the brightness of a pixel (a single element in the video image) at the roofline. This pixel became brighter as the roofline began to descend because the color of the pixel started to change from that of the building façade to the lighter color of the sky.

The approach taken by NIST is summarized in Section 3.6 of the final summary report, NCSTAR 1A (released Nov. 20, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf) and detailed in Section 12.5.3 of NIST NCSTAR 1-9 (available at http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201-9%20Vol%202.pdf).

The analyses of the video (both the estimation of the instant the roofline began to descend and the calculated velocity and acceleration of a point on the roofline) revealed three distinct stages characterizing the 5.4 seconds of collapse:

Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).
Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity


This analysis showed that the 40 percent longer descent time—compared to the 3.9 second free fall time—was due primarily to Stage 1, which corresponded to the buckling of the exterior columns in the lower stories of the north face. During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially in free fall, indicating negligible support from the structure below. This is consistent with the structural analysis model which showed the exterior columns buckling and losing their capacity to support the loads from the structure above. In Stage 3, the acceleration decreased as the upper portion of the north face encountered increased resistance from the collapsed structure and the debris pile below.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 4]

Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » General Discussion » The amazing skill exhibited by the Illuminatti on 9/11

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum