Mug shot of the day

Joanimaroni wrote:

PkrBum wrote:There's that common phrase: "possession of a weapon by a convicted felon."

How do we fix that? Do we cut off every males penis because there are rapes?  How can you fix a criminal or crazy by restricting the rights of already law abiding citizens? Who here if  their family is confronted by a criminal w a gun in their home would prefer not to have a gun? Gawd we're sissified.

Seaoat.

Tho he constantly supports restrictions and controls that he appears clueless as to they will and do lead...

Seagoat wouldn't willingly turn in his guns... but he would certainly register and chip and do whatever the progressive step is.

PkrBum wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

PkrBum wrote:There's that common phrase: "possession of a weapon by a convicted felon."

How do we fix that? Do we cut off every males penis because there are rapes?  How can you fix a criminal or crazy by restricting the rights of already law abiding citizens? Who here if  their family is confronted by a criminal w a gun in their home would prefer not to have a gun? Gawd we're sissified.

Seaoat.

Tho he constantly supports restrictions and controls that he appears clueless as to they will and do lead...

Seagoat wouldn't willingly turn in his guns... but he would certainly register and chip and  do whatever the progressive step is.

Thugs don't care about gun laws but some people think by adding more and more laws to the books everything will be cool. How infantile.

We need judges that will make the punishment so severe the criminals wouldn't think of using a weapon, especially the convicted felons... Once they are convicted of a felony, they are not allowed to possess a weapon......

Jake92 wrote:We need judges that will make the punishment so severe the criminals wouldn't think of using a weapon, especially the convicted felons...  Once they are convicted of a felony, they are not allowed to possess a weapon......

It is a federal offense for convicted felons to possess a firearm. It should be mandatory to prosecute these violators in federal court rather than the county courts. Federal punishment guidelines are a lot stiffer than county or state.

Posting images of people who are only charged with a crime, who haven't been convicted yet, is really low-rent and sleazy. No decent person would take such pleasure in another's misfortune.

That goes for that goes double for that mullet-wrapper, The PNJ.

In a lot of countries, it's illegal to post anything about the defendant in a criminal action before the trial, to avoid possibly damaging the reputation of an innocent person. I gather this doesn't bother you.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

del.capslock wrote:Posting images of people who are only charged with a crime, who haven't been convicted yet, is really low-rent and sleazy. No decent person would take such pleasure in another's misfortune.

That goes for that goes double for that mullet-wrapper, The PNJ.

In a lot of countries, it's illegal to post anything about the defendant in a criminal action before the trial, to avoid possibly damaging the reputation of an innocent person. I gather this doesn't bother you.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

Why...why how dare you speak with such disrespect to the author of the longest running thread on the PNJ, "Mug Shit."

From the files of the longest running thread in PNJ history...