RCP has the candidates now tied on national polls. Romney's momentum is over.

boards of FL wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

And Obama still maintains his lead on the electoral map.

Pack it in, Mitt! It was a good run!

Rogue wrote:
sugar plum sweety pie... last prez election at this time obama was up almost 8 points.

and even in 2004 bush was up by 1.5 points

why are even polls from the 22nd and 25th even in there?

get ready to where my avatar sweetums.. kiss kiss

nochain wrote:Obviously the 146 tossups on the electoral map are not a factor, right Boards?

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:Obviously the 146 tossups on the electoral map are not a factor, right Boards?

Obama leads in the electoral map with or without toss-up states.

salinsky wrote:

Rogue wrote:
sugar plum sweety pie... last prez election at this time obama was up almost 8 points.

and even in 2004 bush was up by 1.5 points

why are even polls from the 22nd and 25th even in there?

get ready to where my avatar sweetums.. kiss kiss

Put down the crack pipe and back slowly away from your keyboard.

boards of FL wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

And Obama still maintains his lead on the electoral map.

Pack it in, Mitt! It was a good run!

NaNook wrote:

boards of FL wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

And Obama still maintains his lead on the electoral map.

Pack it in, Mitt! It was a good run!

In other words, Obama voters need not bother to vote. All Obama voters can skip voting on election day, Obama has already won. Thanks for the heads-up......

Rogue wrote:

NaNook wrote:

boards of FL wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

And Obama still maintains his lead on the electoral map.

Pack it in, Mitt! It was a good run!

In other words, Obama voters need not bother to vote. All Obama voters can skip voting on election day, Obama has already won. Thanks for the heads-up......

havnt most obama voters voted already?

anyone here a obama voter who hasnt voted yet, raise yor hand please.

Rogue wrote:

NaNook wrote:

boards of FL wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

And Obama still maintains his lead on the electoral map.

Pack it in, Mitt! It was a good run!

In other words, Obama voters need not bother to vote. All Obama voters can skip voting on election day, Obama has already won. Thanks for the heads-up......

havnt most obama voters voted already?

anyone here a obama voter who hasnt voted yet, raise yor hand please.

boards of FL wrote:http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_

The Economist endorses Barack Obama.

boards of FL wrote:http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_

The Economist endorses Barack Obama.

salinsky wrote:

boards of FL wrote:http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_

The Economist endorses Barack Obama.

As did Mayor Bloomberg.

It's really quite remarkable.

Even the plutocrats can't stomach Willard's inveterate lying.

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:Obviously the 146 tossups on the electoral map are not a factor, right Boards?

Obama leads in the electoral map with or without toss-up states.

stormwatch89 wrote:I, so hope, the "results" are not in.

It's an important election and will have everything to do with what direction this country takes.

We're no longer the best place to live, no longer the number 1 superpower and our credit rating has been lowered (relax MC and Boards).

We've lost much, but some fail to see it. Perhaps, there is recovery available, but not if Obama has the next 4 years.

No Country can be a superpower when they owe and owe and owe with no plan for repayment.

Liberals and conservatives must realize that we are on a path we simply can't afford or defend.

salinsky wrote:

Rogue wrote:
sugar plum sweety pie... last prez election at this time obama was up almost 8 points.

and even in 2004 bush was up by 1.5 points

why are even polls from the 22nd and 25th even in there?

get ready to where my avatar sweetums.. kiss kiss

Put down the crack pipe and back slowly away from your keyboard.

Rogue wrote:

salinsky wrote:

boards of FL wrote:http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_

The Economist endorses Barack Obama.

As did Mayor Bloomberg.

It's really quite remarkable.

Even the plutocrats can't stomach Willard's inveterate lying.

is that the same commie bloomberg who banned large sodas?

and now we are bragging about getting endorsements from other countries, specially like LONDON lol

i also hear obama is #1 in russia too

salinsky wrote:

Rogue wrote:
sugar plum sweety pie... last prez election at this time obama was up almost 8 points.

and even in 2004 bush was up by 1.5 points

why are even polls from the 22nd and 25th even in there?

get ready to where my avatar sweetums.. kiss kiss

Put down the crack pipe and back slowly away from your keyboard.

othershoe1030 wrote:http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com

This is Nate's take. Obama's chances of winning: 79%.
Mittens: 21%.

Check the odds in Vegas, money is money at this point it has no partisanship. I don't know how to get in to that data, maybe someone else here can do it?