Oh my goodness, the new special counsel tied to radical islamic groups

Go figure.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2017/05/russia-special-counsel-mueller-conspired-radical-islamic-groups-fbi-chief/

Judicialwatch.org calls itself conservative and non-partisan. The two handles are mutually exclusive, as the following listing of heavily biased articles clearly demonstrates:

https://www.nytimes.com/topic/organization/judicial-watch

I wouldn't trust a judicialwatch story any farther than I could throw it.

I know, you hate facts when they are not in favor of your liberal masters.

WINGNUT WATCH

If you follow Phoenix politics, then you are familiar with the activities of a Washington, D.C.-based group called Judicial Watch, which seems to be suing half the city at any given moment — notably, the half that doesn't agree with it. But more on that in a sec.

The local press normally softballs any reference to Judicial Watch, characterizing it in print as a "conservative think tank" or a "watchdog group."

It is more than conservative. In fact, Judicial Watch specializes in far-right-wing advocacy, and though the group is designated by the Internal Revenue Service as non-partisan and tax-exempt, it pursues a relentless wing-nut agenda, one that includes the insidious cause of nativism.

You can read the rest for yourself here:

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/richard-mellon-scaifes-cash-pays-for-judicial-watchs-ideologically-motivated-lawsuits-6446911