Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Willard Urged Business Owners to Bully Employees Into Voting Republican

+4
Floridatexan
hallboy
no stress
Sal
8 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Sal

Sal

If this type of intimidation is allowed to continue, you'll start to see workers embracing a hard-edged socialist attitude and a radicalization of the labor force. The plutocrats are pressing their luck.

In a June 6, 2012 conference call posted on the anti-union National Federation of Independent Business’s website, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney instructed employers to tell their employees how to vote in the upcoming election.

Romney was addressing a group of self-described "small-business owners." Twenty-six minutes into the call, after making a lengthy case that President Obama's first term has been bad for business, Romney said:

"I hope you make it very clear to your employees what you believe is in the best interest of your enterprise and therefore their job and their future in the upcoming elections. And whether you agree with me or you agree with President Obama, or whatever your political view, I hope, I hope you pass those along to your employees."

The call raises the question of whether the Romney campaign is complicit in the corporate attempts to influence employees' votes that have been recently making headlines. On Sunday, In These Times broke the news that Koch Industries mailed at least 45,000 employees a voter information packet that included a flyer endorsing Romney and a letter warning, “Many of our more than 50,000 U.S. employees and contractors may suffer the consequences [of a bad election result], including higher gasoline prices, runaway inflation, and other ills.” Last week, Gawker obtained an email in which the CEO of Westgate Resorts, Florida billionaire David Siegel, informed his 7,000 employees that an Obama victory would likely lead to layoffs at his company. This week, MSNBC’s Up with Chris Hayes unveiled an email by ASG Software Solutions CEO Arthur Allen in which he, too, warned employees that an Obama second term would spell layoffs.

In the June call, Romney went on to reassure his audience that it is perfectly legal for them to talk to their employees about how to vote:

"Nothing illegal about you talking to your employees about what you believe is best for the business, because I think that will figure into their election decision, their voting decision and of course doing that with your family and your kids as well."

He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

no stress

no stress

Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play

hallboy

hallboy

Gunz wrote:Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play


AMEN ! Great point. Exclamation

Guest


Guest

salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.

no stress

no stress

nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.


This is simply the tension rising to the surface with the libs. First it was FTs rant which was very telling and now this. With every post from them my smile gets bigger. After next Monday night we will probably have to put them all on suicide watch. LOL



Last edited by Gunz on 10/18/2012, 11:53 am; edited 1 time in total

Guest


Guest

The ceo is an open socialist (weinstein)... among the noted contributers is norm chomsky. Now you know.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Gunz wrote:Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play

BS...and you know it. You can't even talk about '08 without going back to talk about the "Christian coalition".

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.

Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.

Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.

How do you feel about the govt asking a biz to hold layoff notices until after the election with a promise to cover legal liability?

Guest


Guest

[quote="Floridatexan"]
nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I

Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.

Even a brain dead BHO drone like you couldn't POSSIBLY believe that idiotic statement.

Guest


Guest

nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.

'Sally' is doing what liberals do...displaying desparation....OK let's play for a second....Unions? (teachers/teamsters-J. Hoffa Jr)....Black Panthers?....Dead voters still voting....Suddenly around election time separation of church and state rhetoric is relaxed for liberals...Geez don't be a wuss just because you democrats can't think of everything first....

Sal

Sal

You rightwing ankle-biters lining up eagerly to give your pound of flesh to your corporatist overlords are just useful idiots. This is an economic issue, not a political one. If the plutocrats continue to take more and more while giving less and less back to the workers, our social contract will be null and void. We are already seeing cracks in the facade in the form of growing income inequality and the Occupy movement. I'm thinking of going into the guillotine business. I'd make a killing, so to speak. When the levy breaks, you will be well advised to get out of the way.

Guest


Guest

If the levy breaks...the left better hope the military is funded. The clingers to guns and religion arn't push overs.

Guest


Guest

salinsky wrote:You rightwing ankle-biters lining up eagerly to give your pound of flesh to your corporatist overlords are just useful idiots. This is an economic issue, not a political one. If the plutocrats continue to take more and more while giving less and less back to the workers, our social contract will be null and void. We are already seeing cracks in the facade in the form of growing income inequality and the Occupy movement. I'm thinking of going into the guillotine business. I'd make a killing, so to speak. When the levy breaks, you will be well advised to get out of the way.

Sounds more like the Obamanomics Plan but then you could never see the forest for the one tree.

Yella

Yella

salinsky wrote:If this type of intimidation is allowed to continue, you'll start to see workers embracing a hard-edged socialist attitude and a radicalization of the labor force. The plutocrats are pressing their luck.

In a June 6, 2012 conference call posted on the anti-union National Federation of Independent Business’s website, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney instructed employers to tell their employees how to vote in the upcoming election.

Romney was addressing a group of self-described "small-business owners." Twenty-six minutes into the call, after making a lengthy case that President Obama's first term has been bad for business, Romney said:

"I hope you make it very clear to your employees what you believe is in the best interest of your enterprise and therefore their job and their future in the upcoming elections. And whether you agree with me or you agree with President Obama, or whatever your political view, I hope, I hope you pass those along to your employees."

The call raises the question of whether the Romney campaign is complicit in the corporate attempts to influence employees' votes that have been recently making headlines. On Sunday, In These Times broke the news that Koch Industries mailed at least 45,000 employees a voter information packet that included a flyer endorsing Romney and a letter warning, “Many of our more than 50,000 U.S. employees and contractors may suffer the consequences [of a bad election result], including higher gasoline prices, runaway inflation, and other ills.” Last week, Gawker obtained an email in which the CEO of Westgate Resorts, Florida billionaire David Siegel, informed his 7,000 employees that an Obama victory would likely lead to layoffs at his company. This week, MSNBC’s Up with Chris Hayes unveiled an email by ASG Software Solutions CEO Arthur Allen in which he, too, warned employees that an Obama second term would spell layoffs.

In the June call, Romney went on to reassure his audience that it is perfectly legal for them to talk to their employees about how to vote:

"Nothing illegal about you talking to your employees about what you believe is best for the business, because I think that will figure into their election decision, their voting decision and of course doing that with your family and your kids as well."

He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

I doubt it matters now, Willard will be history after November 7.

http://warpedinblue,blogspot.com/

no stress

no stress

Floridatexan wrote:
Gunz wrote:Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play

BS...and you know it. You can't even talk about '08 without going back to talk about the "Christian coalition".


It never happened? Its BS? You are delusional on so many levels!! Evil or Very Mad

no stress

no stress

salinsky wrote:You rightwing ankle-biters lining up eagerly to give your pound of flesh to your corporatist overlords are just useful idiots. This is an economic issue, not a political one. If the plutocrats continue to take more and more while giving less and less back to the workers, our social contract will be null and void. We are already seeing cracks in the facade in the form of growing income inequality and the Occupy movement. I'm thinking of going into the guillotine business. I'd make a killing, so to speak. When the levy breaks, you will be well advised to get out of the way.


The occupy movement? lol! lol! lol! Your (sic) killing us threadbare!!!!

VectorMan

VectorMan

Then you have liberal teachers trying to get new and young voters to pledge to vote for Obama. Students may fear getting bad grades if they don't play along.

Working people that will lose their jobs if Obama is re-elected know not to vote for him. Who will the unemployed vote for?

Guest


Guest

VectorMan wrote:Then you have liberal teachers trying to get new and young voters to pledge to vote for Obama. Students may fear getting bad grades if they don't play along.

Working people that will lose their jobs if Obama is re-elected know not to vote for him. Who will the unemployed vote for?

That's a good point... If anyone knows the failed policies of obama... The unemployed should. Unless they like subsistence.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

Gunz wrote:Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play

Wasn't just '08....as a teen I remember our maid coming to the house crying and wringing her hands. She sat down with my mom and told her she feared retaliation because she did not vote for the candidates that were on the list she was given by the church officials. My mom tried to explain that no one would know how she voted....our maid told mom they stood right outside the booth and she was convinced "they" would know.

Sal

Sal

Joanimaroni wrote:
Wasn't just '08....as a teen I remember our maid coming to the house crying and wringing her hands. She sat down with my mom and told her she feared retaliation because she did not vote for the candidates that were on the list she was given by the church officials. My mom tried to explain that no one would know how she voted....our maid told mom they stood right outside the booth and she was convinced "they" would know.

And after her virtuoso performance, she gratefully accepted the money they had promised her for voting for the conservative candidates of their choices, and laughed all the way home at their gullible cracker asses.

LMAO.



Last edited by salinsky on 10/18/2012, 6:05 pm; edited 1 time in total

Guest


Guest

Joanimaroni wrote:
Gunz wrote:Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play

Wasn't just '08....as a teen I remember our maid coming to the house crying and wringing her hands. She sat down with my mom and told her she feared retaliation because she did not vote for the candidates that were on the list she was given by the church officials. My mom tried to explain that no one would know how she voted....our maid told mom they stood right outside the booth and she was convinced "they" would know.

It doesn't compare to that account... but I felt violation when I had to write papers that were not my beliefs... and I did many times in college. There was pressure to conform... to drink the koolaid.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

PkrBum wrote:
Joanimaroni wrote:
Gunz wrote:Wow! Kinda reminds me of the preachers instructing their congregation how to vote in '08 and then providing church buses to take them to the polls. Turnabout is fair play

Wasn't just '08....as a teen I remember our maid coming to the house crying and wringing her hands. She sat down with my mom and told her she feared retaliation because she did not vote for the candidates that were on the list she was given by the church officials. My mom tried to explain that no one would know how she voted....our maid told mom they stood right outside the booth and she was convinced "they" would know.

It doesn't compare to that account... but I felt violation when I had to write papers that were not my beliefs... and I did many times in college. There was pressure to conform... to drink the koolaid.


Hate it... I felt so sorry for our sweet lady...she went to bed every night thinking someone would burn her house down.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.

Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.

How do you feel about the govt asking a biz to hold layoff notices until after the election with a promise to cover legal liability?

That it's just more right-wing spin and that anyone who's stupid enough to vote for Romney should probably move to another country to avoid embarrassment.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Gunz wrote:
nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:[font=Arial Black]I
He's correct that such speech is now legal for the first time ever, thanks to the Citizen United ruling, which overturned previous Federal Election Commission laws that prohibited employers from political campaigning among employees.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/14046/romney_instructed_employers_to_tell_employees_how_to_vote_in_conference_cal

So now you dredge up that Romney is doing something LEGAL and imply it is wrong??? How pathetic.


This is simply the tension rising to the surface with the libs. First it was FTs rant which was very telling and now this. With every post from them my smile gets bigger. After next Monday night we will probably have to put them all on suicide watch. LOL

Sounds like you have a problem with me. GOOD!

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum