https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html?tid=sm_tw
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Sal wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html?tid=sm_tw
RealLindaL wrote:Sal wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html?tid=sm_tw
This story is already being thoroughly ignored by the right.
Telstar wrote:
Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!
Jake92 wrote:I guess since she made a mistake, we should all drive 100 MPH thru school zones and tell the judge we made a mistake but shouldn't be punished.
PkrBum wrote:Silly comrades... Oops, I just shit my undies again!.
Sal wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html?tid=sm_tw
gatorfan wrote:
Criminal or not - and at this point it doesn't matter, HRC showed the world she is careless and that the "rules' don't apply to her. If that doesn't sound familiar you only have to look at the current White House occupant. It would have been interesting if this didn't happen (from your linked article):
"The review did not encompass a separate collection of emails that Clinton’s lawyers withheld from the State Department and that she later destroyed, saying they were private and did not pertain to government business — a determination that was not verified by State Department officials."
Who decided those yahoos were qualified to "screen" documents or that they were capable of telling the truth????
The Trumpet and HRC, two peas in a pod. Nether could speak the truth if it would save their life. And some in the liberal community want her to jump into the current race. You just can't make this crap up.
Sal wrote:gatorfan wrote:
Criminal or not - and at this point it doesn't matter, HRC showed the world she is careless and that the "rules' don't apply to her. If that doesn't sound familiar you only have to look at the current White House occupant. It would have been interesting if this didn't happen (from your linked article):
"The review did not encompass a separate collection of emails that Clinton’s lawyers withheld from the State Department and that she later destroyed, saying they were private and did not pertain to government business — a determination that was not verified by State Department officials."
Who decided those yahoos were qualified to "screen" documents or that they were capable of telling the truth????
The Trumpet and HRC, two peas in a pod. Nether could speak the truth if it would save their life. And some in the liberal community want her to jump into the current race. You just can't make this crap up.
Shorter: "Yeah!, but what about her recipes and thank you notes?? Huh?? Huh?? Huh???"
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|