Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

UPDATE 8/18/2015 State Dept. uncovers nearly 18,000 missing emails; List of Clinton’s emails flagged for classified data EXPLODES TO OVER 300!!

+5
ZVUGKTUBM
Floridatexan
Wordslinger
2seaoat
Markle
9 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Markle

Markle

Oh dear, let the whining begin...2seaoat, and our other Progressives will not be happy!  

List of Clinton’s emails flagged for classified data hits 60
Published August 16, 2015
·The Washington Times


While media coverage has focused on a half-dozen of Hillary Clinton’s  personal emails containing sensitive intelligence, the total number of her private emails identified by an ongoing State Department review as having contained classified data has ballooned to 60, officials told The Washington Times.

That figure is current through the end of July and is likely to grow as officials wade through a total of 30,000 work-related emails that passed through her personal email server, officials said. The process is expected to take months.

The 60 emails are among those that have been reviewed and cleared for release under the Freedom of Information Act as part of an open-records lawsuit. Some of the emails have multiple redactions for classified information.

Among the first 60 flagged emails, nearly all contained classified secrets at the lowest level of “confidential” and one contained information at the intermediate level of “secret,” officials told the Times.

Those 60 emails do not include two emails identified in recent days by Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III as containing “top-secret” information possibly derived from Pentagon satellites, drones or intercepts, which is some of the nation’s most sensitive secrets.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/16/list-clintons-emails-flagged-for-classified-data-hits-60/?intcmp=latestnews



Last edited by Markle on 8/18/2015, 4:08 pm; edited 2 times in total

Guest


Guest

I posted this in another thread about six hours ago. Each development doesn't need a new thread.

It's much simpler and contextually relevant to use one.

2seaoat



Contextually it was not a crime for Powell to have a private server and have classified AUTHORIZED communication via email where there was no intent to turn over the same to a third party.    Again for the slow....Authorized and intent.  There is no crime for having a private server where electronic email had Classified material unless the party charge intended to transfer classified documents to an unauthorized person.   I know these concepts are simple....and I know you adherents to 8 x 0 is more than 4 x 0, and focus on the eight and the four getting all excited about the same, but if you cannot conceptually process zero, then you will buy into the propaganda and the total non story of this investigation. 

Now if as PK suggested the FBI is focusing on somebody who was removing classification nomenclature with the intent to allow unauthorized third parties to see those documents, then yes that would be something the FBI would review, but Hillary is not stupid and will easily handle Gomer and some of the same mental giants we are seeing here on this issue.  She committed no crime, but keep beating that dead horse.....you guys did for two years on Benghazi, and NOTHING......do you see the pattern.  Mr. Markle......just for your edification.....60 x 0 is the same as 4 x 0.

Markle

Markle

PkrBum wrote:I posted this in another thread about six hours ago. Each development doesn't need a new thread.

It's much simpler and contextually relevant to use one.

Month old thread that you resurrected which didn't address the current issue.

2seaoat



Month old thread that you resurrected which didn't address the current issue.

Sorry, they are exactly the same.  It is not a crime to have a private server.  It is not a crime to have a classified document communicated to you where you are authorized and had no intent to transfer that information to an unauthorized person.  No crime....same premise on both threads.....4 x 0    60x 0 and you think there are two answers and that the other thread did not address the same.  Brilliant

Guest


Guest

Markle wrote:
PkrBum wrote:I posted this in another thread about six hours ago. Each development doesn't need a new thread.

It's much simpler and contextually relevant to use one.

Month old thread that you resurrected which didn't address the current issue.


Liar... You like to throw that around. How do you like to wear it? Liar.

Further... why wouldn't you want one complete record of the topic? Perhaps seagoat is right about you. Is there a bonus?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

The basic issue is totally irrelevant. Bernie Sanders is now ahead of Hillary in national polls. Hillary has already become an "also ran," but, considering your limited touch with reality, I fully understand your misdirection. Whether the emails end up destroying Hillary or not doesn't matter.

It's going to be Sanders vs. Trump, and the death of the republican party -- which actually died some time ago but has only recently begun to really stink. LOL

Guest


Guest

If you think bernie has the wide appeal to motivate the huddled masses you are sadly mistaken.

I guess he could start promising alot more than a new holiday. Taking from others to buy votes is always popular.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:If you think bernie has the wide appeal to motivate the huddled masses you are sadly mistaken.

I guess he could start promising alot more than a new holiday. Taking from others to buy votes is always popular.


The number of people attending Bernie's appearances, and the latest national polls, shows that Sanders does indeed have the appeal to motivate the masses -- people who will vote for him, against Trump.

Taking from others to buy votes -- are you referring to the republicans and the Koch Bros?

Try this on for size: The reason Trump is trumping all the other 94,356 republican candidates is because he can't be bought. And neither can Bernie.

All of a sudden, the American people have turned on the politicians who want to further letting the ultra rich run the show.

You should start thinking that over, because the game has changed.

Guest


Guest

Left coast white guilt ridden socialists don't equal wide appeal or a motivated minority base.

He's going to have to start promising alot more of other peoples shit.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:Left coast white guilt ridden socialists don't equal wide appeal or a motivated minority base.

He's going to have to start promising alot more of other peoples shit.

Tell us how hot is cold, wet is dry, etc. Bernie is outdrawing the audiences of ALL the republican candidates combined, not including Trump. LOL

Guest


Guest

You do realize we are over a year from the election... right? Premature eleculation can be treated comrade.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:You do realize we are over a year from the election... right? Premature eleculation can be treated comrade.

Have you received treatment?

Guest


Guest

by Wordslinger Today at 1:53 pm
PkrBum wrote:

If you think bernie has the wide appeal to motivate the huddled masses you are sadly mistaken.

I guess he could start promising alot more than a new holiday. Taking from others to buy votes is always popular.


The number of people attending Bernie's appearances, and the latest national polls, shows that Sanders does indeed have the appeal to motivate the masses -- people who will vote for him, against Trump.

Taking from others to buy votes -- are you referring to the republicans and the Koch Bros?

Try this on for size: The reason Trump is trumping all the other 94,356 republican candidates is because he can't be bought. And neither can Bernie.

All of a sudden, the American people have turned on the politicians who want to further letting the ultra rich run the show.

You should start thinking that over, because the game has changed.
------
Sanders obviously won't get the black vote as they shut down his rally just the other day.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

PkrBum wrote:
Markle wrote:
PkrBum wrote:I posted this in another thread about six hours ago. Each development doesn't need a new thread.

It's much simpler and contextually relevant to use one.

Month old thread that you resurrected which didn't address the current issue.


Liar... You like to throw that around. How do you like to wear it? Liar.

Further... why wouldn't you want one complete record of the topic? Perhaps seagoat is right about you. Is there a bonus?

Semi-demented poster Markle often starts two or more threads on the same topic, or opens new ones just to keep his name at the top of the forum. He feeds off the negativity his topics and posts generate.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:The basic issue is totally irrelevant.  Bernie Sanders is now ahead of Hillary in national polls.  Hillary has already become an "also ran," but, considering your limited touch with reality, I fully understand your misdirection.  Whether the emails end up destroying Hillary or not doesn't matter.  

It's going to be Sanders vs. Trump, and the death of the republican party -- which actually died some time ago but has only recently begun to really stink.  LOL

We can only HOPE!

I believe you are wrong about leading in national polls. He has been leading in the FAR LEFT locations where he has appeared not on national polls.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Left coast white guilt ridden socialists don't equal wide appeal or a motivated minority base.

He's going to have to start promising alot more of other peoples shit.

Tell us how hot is cold, wet is dry, etc.  Bernie is outdrawing the audiences of ALL the republican candidates combined, not including Trump. LOL

ALL CANDIDATES...EXCEPT FOR....LOL

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI



Markle

Markle

And the scandals continues to explode. This is getting to be like a slow motion video of a skyscraper being imploded.

Official: More than 300 Clinton emails flagged for potentially classified info

Published August 17, 2015
·FoxNews.com

The number of Hillary Clinton emails flagged for potentially classified content has grown to more than 300, Fox News has learned -- with the potential to grow even more as officials scramble to screen the documents.

The State Department revealed the updated count in a federal court filing, which pertained to Clinton emails sent to other agencies for review. An official familiar with the investigation confirmed to Fox News that, as referenced in that filing, the department has recommended 305 of Clinton's emails be sent to various agencies for review to see whether they contain classified information.

The number could continue to rise as officials comb through more documents; the past three State Department releases have contained a total of 63 classified emails to date.

Clinton's presidential campaign has insisted she never exchanged emails marked classified at the time while secretary of state. "She viewed classified materials in hard copy in her office or via other secure means while traveling, not on email," campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri said in an email to supporters last week.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/17/official-more-than-300-clinton-emails-flagged-for-potentially-classified-info/

2seaoat



Still waiting for something criminal or unauthorized with the intent to commit a criminal act......I think I will be waiting for some time.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:If you think bernie has the wide appeal to motivate the huddled masses you are sadly mistaken.

I guess he could start promising alot more than a new holiday. Taking from others to buy votes is always popular.


The number of people attending Bernie's appearances, and the latest national polls, shows that Sanders does indeed have the appeal to motivate the masses -- people who will vote for him, against Trump.

Taking from others to buy votes -- are you referring to the republicans and the Koch Bros?

Try this on for size:  The reason Trump is trumping all the other 94,356 republican candidates is because he can't be bought.  And neither can Bernie.

All of a sudden, the American people have turned on the politicians who want to further letting the ultra rich run the show.

You should start thinking that over, because the game has changed.

I guess you aren't counting the masses of Blacks that shut down a recent rally where Bernie just had to sack the bats and go home......so quickly you forget.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Still waiting for something criminal or unauthorized with the intent to commit a criminal act......I think I will be waiting for some time.

There doesn't have to be intent when dealing with classified up to TS/SCI information being exchanged on unsecure networks.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Still waiting for something criminal or unauthorized with the intent to commit a criminal act......I think I will be waiting for some time.

No intent is necessary. I would have thought even you were smart enough to have throw in the towel as to there NOT having been criminal acts. But then, you're not here for reality, just something to pass the time.

2seaoat



There are two required things a prosecutor must prove......was the person authorized to receive the documents and did they have the intent to pass those documents to a third party who was unauthorized.  Sorry, Powell or Clinton committed no crime having a personal server where email was sent to them where they did not meet the required prima facia case.   Simpletons....at this point that is all I can say....simpletons.  I still waiting for both of you to show us how President Obama was not a citizen.....bone chilling stupid.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum