Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

NRA Terrorists Threaten Violence Against Americans That Oppose Them

+5
Deus X
Joanimaroni
RealLindaL
PkrBum
Telstar
9 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Go down  Message [Page 4 of 4]

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Telstar wrote:

ROBERT REICH: WHO SENT THE THUGS TO BERKELEY?

BY ROBERT REICH ON 2/4/17 AT 7:50 AM

This article first appeared on RobertReich.org.

The events at Berkeley Wednesday night have been a boon to Milo Yiannopoulos, of Breitbart News, and to Steve Bannon, formerly head of Breitbart News and now Trump’s consigliere.

As you may know, on Wednesday night, February 1, Berkeley gave Yiannopoulos a major forum to spout his racist and misogynistic vitriol. But police had to cancel the talk because about 150 masked agitators threw Molotov cocktails, smashed windows where Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak and threw rocks and fireworks at the police – delivering made-for-TV images of a riot.

Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now

According to a promotional Breitbart story that ran before the event, Yiannopoulos was going to “ call for the withdrawal of federal grants and the prosecution of university officials who endanger their students with their policies.”

Which is exactly what Trump did via tweet early the next morning:: “If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view — NO FEDERAL FUNDS?”

Related : Michael Dorf: Trump's Toxic Mix of Incompetence and Malevolence
Thursday night, Yiannopoulos had a friendly interview on Fox News’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight” – a show that, according to the Washington Post, has ridden anger at left-wing activism into best-in-class prime time ratings.

Yiannopoulos wasn’t asked about the content of the speech that was shut down. The conversation focused instead on how Berkeley proved the point that the Left was ceding its right to federal grants by cracking down on free speech.

Which raises the possibility that Yiannopoulos and Brietbart were in cahoots with the agitators, in order to lay the groundwork for a Trump crackdown on universities and their federal funding.

Thursday night on CNN, I said “I wouldn’t bet against” that possibility. Almost immediately an indignant article appeared in Breitbart News, misleadingly headlined “Robert Reich Lies, Claims Breitbart News Organized Berkeley Riots.”

Hmmm. Connect these dots:

(1) Yinnopoulos writes for Breitbart News, which Steve Bannon – Trump’s strategy director – ran before joining Trump.

(2) Before Yiannopoulos speaks at Berkeley, Breitbart publishes an article saying that Yiannopoulos will call for the withdrawal of federal grants and the prosecution of university officials who endanger their students with their policies.

(3) Berkeley opens its doors to Yiannopoulos, but campus police have to cancel the event because of masked agitators.

(4) Hours later, Trump issues a misleading tweet, accusing the university of not allowing free speech and promoting violence against innocent people with different views and threatening to withhold federal funds.

(5) The next night, Yiannopoulos on Fox News says the incident proves that universities like Berkeley don’t deserve federal grants by cracking down on free speech.

(6) That same night, on CNN, I raise the possibility that Yiannopoulos and Breitbart could have been collaborating with the agitators – saying “I wouldn’t bet against it.” This generates a belligerent column in Breitbart with a misleading headline calling me a liar for claiming that Breitbart News organized the riots.

I don’t want to add to the conspiratorial musings of so many about this very conspiratorial administration, but it strikes me there may be something worrying going on here.

I wouldn’t bet against it.

***********

Robert Reich is the chancellor’s professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and a senior fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, and Time magazine named him one of the 10 most effective Cabinet secretaries of the 20th century. He has written 14 books, including the best-sellers Aftershock, The Work of Nations and Beyond Outrage and, most recently, Saving Capitalism. He is also a founding editor of The American Prospect magazine, chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and co-creator of the award-winning documentary Inequality for All.

http://www.newsweek.com/robert-reich-who-sent-thugs-berkeley-552577

Telstar

Telstar

Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.



zsomething



Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.

Everything he says is a lie.   I argue with plenty of people online, but this one is literally too stupid to converse with.  It's a complete waste of any intelligent person's time.  I'm basically operating under the theory that he died a while back from a combo of eating paint chips and stuff he found on the sidewalk, plus fireworks-related injuries.   The board's system occasionally just hiccups old posts of his from before that happened, due to a glitch in the software.  He's not actually here, and was worthless when he was.

Telstar

Telstar

zsomething wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.

Everything he says is a lie.   I argue with plenty of people online, but this one is literally too stupid to converse with.  It's a complete waste of any intelligent person's time.  I'm basically operating under the theory that he died a while back from a combo of eating paint chips and stuff he found on the sidewalk, plus fireworks-related injuries.   The board's system occasionally just hiccups old posts of his from before that happened, due to a glitch in the software.  He's not actually here, and was worthless when he was.



Yes that may be it.

PkrBum

PkrBum

zsomething wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.

Everything he says is a lie.   I argue with plenty of people online, but this one is literally too stupid to converse with.  It's a complete waste of any intelligent person's time.  I'm basically operating under the theory that he died a while back from a combo of eating paint chips and stuff he found on the sidewalk, plus fireworks-related injuries.   The board's system occasionally just hiccups old posts of his from before that happened, due to a glitch in the software.  He's not actually here, and was worthless when he was.

It must be nice to be clueless. I really mean it.

H. G. Wells, one of the most influential progressives of the 20th century, said in 1932 that progressives must become “liberal fascists” and “enlightened Nazis.” Regarding totalitarianism, he stated: “I have never been able to escape altogether from its relentless logic.” Calling for a “‘Phoenix Rebirth’ of Liberalism” under the umbrella of “Liberal Fascism,” Wells said: “I am asking for a Liberal Fascisti, for enlightened Nazis.”

The poet Wallace Stevens pronounced himself “pro-Mussolini personally.”

The eminent historian Charles Beard wrote of Mussolini’s efforts: “Beyond question, an amazing experiment is being made [in Italy], an experiment in reconciling individualism and socialism.”

Muckraking journalists almost universally admired Mussolini. Lincoln Steffens, for one, said that Italian fascism made Western democracy, by comparison, look like a system run by “petty persons with petty purposes.” Mussolini, Steffens proclaimed reverently, had been “formed” by God “out of the rib of Italy.”

McClure’s Magazine founder Samuel McClure, an important figure in the muckraking movement, described Italian fascism as “a great step forward and the first new ideal in government since the founding of the American Republic.”

After having vistited Italy and interviewed Mussolini in 1926, the American humorist Will Rogers, who was informally dubbed “Ambassador-at-Large of the United States” by the
National Press Club, said of the fascist dictator: “I’m pretty high on that bird.” “Dictator form of government is the greatest form of government,” Rogers wrote, “that is, if you have the right dictator.”

Reporter Ida Tarbell was deeply impressed by Mussolini's attitudes regarding labor, affectionately dubbing him “a despot with a dimple.”

NAACP co-founder W. E. B. DuBois saw National Socialism as a worthy model for economic organization. The establishment of the Nazi dictatorship in Germany, he wrote, had been “absolutely necessary to get the state in order.” In 1937 DuBois stated: “there is today, in some respects, more democracy in Germany than there has been in years past.”

FDR adviser Rexford Guy Tugwell said of Italian fascism: “It's the cleanest, neatest, most efficiently operating piece of social machinery I've ever seen. It makes me envious.”

New Republic editor George Soule, who avidly supported FDR, noted approvingly that the Roosevelt administration was “trying out the economics of fascism.”

Playwright George Bernard Shaw hailed Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini as the world’s great “progressive” leaders because they “did things,” unlike the leaders of those “putrefying corpses” called parliamentary democracies.

Telstar

Telstar

PkrBum wrote:
zsomething wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.

Everything he says is a lie.   I argue with plenty of people online, but this one is literally too stupid to converse with.  It's a complete waste of any intelligent person's time.  I'm basically operating under the theory that he died a while back from a combo of eating paint chips and stuff he found on the sidewalk, plus fireworks-related injuries.   The board's system occasionally just hiccups old posts of his from before that happened, due to a glitch in the software.  He's not actually here, and was worthless when he was.

It must be nice to be clueless. I really mean it.

H. G. Wells, one of the most influential progressives of the 20th century, said in 1932 that progressives must become “liberal fascists” and “enlightened Nazis.” Regarding totalitarianism, he stated: “I have never been able to escape altogether from its relentless logic.” Calling for a “‘Phoenix Rebirth’ of Liberalism” under the umbrella of “Liberal Fascism,” Wells said: “I am asking for a Liberal Fascisti, for enlightened Nazis.”

The poet Wallace Stevens pronounced himself “pro-Mussolini personally.”

The eminent historian Charles Beard wrote of Mussolini’s efforts: “Beyond question, an amazing experiment is being made [in Italy], an experiment in reconciling individualism and socialism.”

Muckraking journalists almost universally admired Mussolini. Lincoln Steffens, for one, said that Italian fascism made Western democracy, by comparison, look like a system run by “petty persons with petty purposes.” Mussolini, Steffens proclaimed reverently, had been “formed” by God “out of the rib of Italy.”

McClure’s Magazine founder Samuel McClure, an important figure in the muckraking movement, described Italian fascism as “a great step forward and the first new ideal in government since the founding of the American Republic.”

After having vistited Italy and interviewed Mussolini in 1926, the American humorist Will Rogers, who was informally dubbed “Ambassador-at-Large of the United States” by the
National Press Club, said of the fascist dictator: “I’m pretty high on that bird.” “Dictator form of government is the greatest form of government,” Rogers wrote, “that is, if you have the right dictator.”

Reporter Ida Tarbell was deeply impressed by Mussolini's attitudes regarding labor, affectionately dubbing him “a despot with a dimple.”

NAACP co-founder W. E. B. DuBois saw National Socialism as a worthy model for economic organization. The establishment of the Nazi dictatorship in Germany, he wrote, had been “absolutely necessary to get the state in order.” In 1937 DuBois stated: “there is today, in some respects, more democracy in Germany than there has been in years past.”

FDR adviser Rexford Guy Tugwell said of Italian fascism: “It's the cleanest, neatest, most efficiently operating piece of social machinery I've ever seen. It makes me envious.”

New Republic editor George Soule, who avidly supported FDR, noted approvingly that the Roosevelt administration was “trying out the economics of fascism.”

Playwright George Bernard Shaw hailed Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini as the world’s great “progressive” leaders because they “did things,” unlike the leaders of those “putrefying corpses” called parliamentary democracies.




zsomething



Telstar wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
zsomething wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In 1933 it was the leftists/progressives that were singing the praises for fascism.

That is a lie.

Everything he says is a lie.   I argue with plenty of people online, but this one is literally too stupid to converse with.  It's a complete waste of any intelligent person's time.  I'm basically operating under the theory that he died a while back from a combo of eating paint chips and stuff he found on the sidewalk, plus fireworks-related injuries.   The board's system occasionally just hiccups old posts of his from before that happened, due to a glitch in the software.  He's not actually here, and was worthless when he was.

(some crazy and pathetic please-pay-attention-to-me shit scrawled in feces upon a madhouse wall by an irrelevant deceased nitwit who craves attention from beyond the grave)






Good video.   It's not a bad thing to remind people of once in a while, because you wouldn't believe some of the crazy wrong-headed stuff a few of them think.  Or thought, before that fateful encounter with the paint chips/fireworks.

PkrBum

PkrBum

You tell me. Does Hitler belong with mao and Stalin... or Washington and Jefferson?

Any measure of any worth to categorize govts would go from less authority to more authority.

That wouldn't be very hard to absorb for an objective mind.

Telstar

Telstar

PkrBum wrote:You tell me.  Does Hitler belong with mao and Stalin... or Washington and Jefferson?

Any measure of any worth to categorize govts would go from less authority to more authority.

That wouldn't be very hard to absorb for an objective mind.




The pills are talking again. clown

Telstar

Telstar

Telstar

Telstar

NRA Terrorists Threaten Violence Against Americans That Oppose Them  - Page 4 Nra_ki10

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote: In San Fran a trump group had to cancel due to violent threats. They aren't racist and denounced any that might've showed up. Two leftist groups did show up... antifa and bamn. There were clashes with police.

Who brings the violence again? Lol... you asshats completely ignore the plain and simple facts.

There's good violence and bad violence Laddy Buck ... the violence cast against the Germans after the Battle of the Bulge comes to mind. Good stuff. The violence of a white racist lynching of a black victim is BAD ALL BAD. Good violence would be what you'd get before you took your first swing at me. LOL

PkrBum

PkrBum

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote: In San Fran a trump group had to cancel due to violent threats. They aren't racist and denounced any that might've showed up. Two leftist groups did show up... antifa and bamn. There were clashes with police.

Who brings the violence again? Lol... you asshats completely ignore the plain and simple facts.

There's good violence and bad violence Laddy Buck ... the violence cast against the Germans after the Battle of the Bulge comes to mind.  Good stuff.  The violence of a white racist lynching of a black victim is BAD ALL BAD.  Good violence would be what you'd get before you took your first swing at me.  LOL

Who's lynching blacks today? For that matter... who owns slaves today? Who is a slave today?

I wouldn't swing at anybody without provocation. See the difference? No... I guess you can't.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote: In San Fran a trump group had to cancel due to violent threats. They aren't racist and denounced any that might've showed up. Two leftist groups did show up... antifa and bamn. There were clashes with police.

Who brings the violence again? Lol... you asshats completely ignore the plain and simple facts.

There's good violence and bad violence Laddy Buck ... the violence cast against the Germans after the Battle of the Bulge comes to mind.  Good stuff.  The violence of a white racist lynching of a black victim is BAD ALL BAD.  Good violence would be what you'd get before you took your first swing at me.  LOL
Code:
u


Silly goose!

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote: In San Fran a trump group had to cancel due to violent threats. They aren't racist and denounced any that might've showed up. Two leftist groups did show up... antifa and bamn. There were clashes with police.

Who brings the violence again? Lol... you asshats completely ignore the plain and simple facts.

There's good violence and bad violence Laddy Buck ... the violence cast against the Germans after the Battle of the Bulge comes to mind.  Good stuff.  The violence of a white racist lynching of a black victim is BAD ALL BAD.  Good violence would be what you'd get before you took your first swing at me.  LOL

Who's lynching blacks today? For that matter... who owns slaves today? Who is a slave today?

I wouldn't swing at anybody without provocation. See the difference? No... I guess you can't.


How is it possible for you to have missed the story of the black high school teacher who was nearly beaten to death by your favored white racists in a parking garage in Charlottesville? I guess it only counts when a black American is killed by hanging ... come out of the closet man. You're obviously a racist Nazi!

PkrBum

PkrBum

PkrBum

PkrBum

PkrBum

PkrBum

They can't even figure out who to sucker punch... lol.

PkrBum

PkrBum

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:

OK, we know exactly where you're coming from -- and which side you're on. You cheer when people who hate racists, anti Semites and Skinhead, KKK types punch out people who are opposed to haters.

Why are we not surprised?

Telstar

Telstar

Wow somebody enjoys posting lots of violent videos that are most likely supplied by the Russian Times. It's probably the pills that make him think like some macho man and not the Michigan closet tennis queen he really is. Laughing

PkrBum

PkrBum

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:

OK, we know exactly where you're coming from -- and which side you're on.  You cheer when people who hate racists, anti Semites and Skinhead, KKK types punch out people who are opposed to haters.

Why are we not surprised?

That guy doesn't even look white. He just loves his country... and hates fucking commies.

But don't let that stop you. Band up with the pencil necks... go kick some ass... lol.

Telstar

Telstar

This one goes out to all the closet tennis queens that abuse drugs and worship their grannies.


zsomething



Some deceased piece-of-shit asks:

Who's lynching blacks today?

If he were actually here, and not just necro-posting from the great beyond, I might give him this link.

I might also mention, amongst the recent talk of knocking out people's teeth and such, that Pensacola's only a few hour's drive, and if he keeps acting like he wants to play that shit, eventually his Nazi-sympathizing punk pussy ass might just get called on it.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 4 of 4]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum