Trump threatens to sue NY Times. Times says: "Go fuck yourself."

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

As you know, Bill Clinton is a rapist and has committed sexual assault.

Had Donald Trump done anything like that, being a billionaire, why didn't Gloria Alred, or whoever, jump up and sue him for a gigantic payday?

boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

As you know, Bill Clinton is a rapist and has committed sexual assault.

Had Donald Trump done anything like that, being a billionaire, why didn't Gloria Alred, or whoever, jump up and sue him for a gigantic payday?

Try and keep up with events.  Allred is representing one of the women who claims she was assaulted by Trump.  The implication is clear: a lawsuit against Trump is probably in the works.  

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

As you know, Bill Clinton is a rapist and has committed sexual assault.

Had Donald Trump done anything like that, being a billionaire, why didn't Gloria Alred, or whoever, jump up and sue him for a gigantic payday?

Try and keep up with events.  Allred is representing one of the women who claims she was assaulted by Trump.  The implication is clear: a lawsuit against Trump is probably in the works.  

EVEN YOU have to admit that anytime a scandal breaks involving people, Anyone who gets between Gloria Alred and a camera will get HURT!  Once she appears on camera with whoever she "represents" she's not heard from until the next troll comes along.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

As you know, Bill Clinton is a rapist and has committed sexual assault.

Had Donald Trump done anything like that, being a billionaire, why didn't Gloria Alred, or whoever, jump up and sue him for a gigantic payday?

Try and keep up with events.  Allred is representing one of the women who claims she was assaulted by Trump.  The implication is clear: a lawsuit against Trump is probably in the works.  

EVEN YOU have to admit that anytime a scandal breaks involving people, Anyone who gets between Gloria Alred and a camera will get HURT!  Once she appears on camera with whoever she "represents" she's not heard from until the next troll comes along.

Congratulations ... you never do run out of bullshit.  Allred does use the public eye, but her firm produces a very high volume of lawsuits, most of which they appear to win.  

PkrBum wrote:Often the damage is done just by the accusation.

Unless it's a dem of course... then even proof doesn't matter.

PkrBum wrote:Often the damage is done just by the accusation.

PkrBum wrote:Often the damage is done just by the accusation.

Unless it's a dem of course... then even proof doesn't matter.

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Often the damage is done just by the accusation.

Unless it's a dem of course... then even proof doesn't matter.

Get real.  Trump on camera bragged that because he was a star, he could get away with kissing and molesting women (grabbing their pussy), etc.  

Then a trainload of women start telling their dreadful stories of Trump's sexual abuse.

Accusations my ass.  However, now that your favorite candidate has driven off more than enough women voters to guarantee his loss, it gives me pleasure to look forward to your forthcoming suffering.    

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Often the damage is done just by the accusation.

Unless it's a dem of course... then even proof doesn't matter.

Get real.  Trump on camera bragged that because he was a star, he could get away with kissing and molesting women (grabbing their pussy), etc.  

Then a trainload of women start telling their dreadful stories of Trump's sexual abuse.

Accusations my ass.  However, now that your favorite candidate has driven off more than enough women voters to guarantee his loss, it gives me pleasure to look forward to your forthcoming suffering.    

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Often the damage is done just by the accusation.

Unless it's a dem of course... then even proof doesn't matter.

Get real.  Trump on camera bragged that because he was a star, he could get away with kissing and molesting women (grabbing their pussy), etc.  

Then a trainload of women start telling their dreadful stories of Trump's sexual abuse.

Accusations my ass.  However, now that your favorite candidate has driven off more than enough women voters to guarantee his loss, it gives me pleasure to look forward to your forthcoming suffering.    

You've really lost your edge of late my Socialist/Communist good friend.

There was no video, it was an audio.  Catch up my boy.

Trainload?  How amusing.  Much like former President Bill Clinton or Ted Kennedy?

This is all you have?  All you can cling onto?  An audio of a couple of guys shooting the bull a decade ago.

Step up your game a bit!

PkrBum wrote:
Are you seriously so dense that you don't know my position on Trump? You've compromised your principles... I haven't. I will not vote for trump... period. Try to keep up.

Sal wrote:
You position on Clinton is that of a peddler of malicious conspiracy theories, false narratives, and absurdly inappropriate equivalencies.

Therefore, your position on Trump is that of an enabler.

RealLindaL wrote:

Sal wrote:
You position on Clinton is that of a peddler of malicious conspiracy theories, false narratives, and absurdly inappropriate equivalencies.

Therefore, your position on Trump is that of an enabler.

I hadn't thought of it exactly that way, but I fear Sal is correct here, Pkr.

PkrBum wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:

Sal wrote:
You position on Clinton is that of a peddler of malicious conspiracy theories, false narratives, and absurdly inappropriate equivalencies.

Therefore, your position on Trump is that of an enabler.

I hadn't thought of it exactly that way, but I fear Sal is correct here, Pkr.

No... y'all are compromising. That's what enables the nomination of the worst choice in our history. If we could reject both of them then there could actually be change and with determination... solutions. Trump has the same chance Bernie had... none. She has the establishment machine, the ruling elite, the monied, and the press... y'all are just the choir.

PkrBum wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:

Sal wrote:
You position on Clinton is that of a peddler of malicious conspiracy theories, false narratives, and absurdly inappropriate equivalencies.

Therefore, your position on Trump is that of an enabler.

I hadn't thought of it exactly that way, but I fear Sal is correct here, Pkr.

No... y'all are compromising. That's what enables the nomination of the worst choice in our history. If we could reject both of them then there could actually be change and with determination... solutions. Trump has the same chance Bernie had... none. She has the establishment machine, the ruling elite, the monied, and the press... y'all are just the choir.

PkrBum wrote:

No... y'all are compromising. That's what enables the nomination of the worst choice in our history. If we could reject both of them then there could actually be change and with determination... solutions.

Wordslinger wrote:Face it my fascist-racist friend, in addition to being your moral hero, Trump is a sleazy creep.  The audio-video which recorded your idol's priceless admissions, broke the back of his evil campaign.  I don't have to step up my game -- your team keeps stumbling all on their own!  LOL