Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Trump threatens to sue NY Times. Times says: "Go fuck yourself."

+9
Markle
2seaoat
boards of FL
Vikingwoman
Sal
gatorfan
Floridatexan
dumpcare
Wordslinger
13 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Trump likes to tell everyone that "I'm really smart."  Judging by the intellect of his foam-at-the-mouth supporters, it's clear that Trump is a genius.

To people with an IQ above 70, Trump comes across as a dangerously unstable carnival barker seducing rubes to buy a $1 ticket, go inside the tent, and watch a three-titted woman pickup a silver dollar from a table with her Gina.    

By comparison, George W. Bush -- the last idiot we somehow let into the White House --- is a nerdy choir boy.  

By the way, it would not be difficult for the NY Times to ascertain if Trump was aboard the airliner -- and where he sat and who was next to him --  where one of his alleged sexual assaults took place.  In the following link you'll have the fun of reading the NY Times' response to Trump's threatening letter.   It's a hoot!



http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/new-york-times-trump-bring-it

dumpcare



He has also just about ruined the Trump brand.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?_r=0

Guest


Guest

So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

You really didn't know? I believe it.

gatorfan



PkrBum wrote:So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

Of course it only matters now! When Bill paid Paula Jones $850,000 for her to go away after doing a live Weiner show, causing many others to come out of the closet with similar harassment stories and forcing Hillary to screech in protest that they were all liars - well it's just another Clinton double standard.

Why is she still "married" to Bill? I know of no other woman who would tolerate a spouses abusive behavior toward so many women over so many years. It couldn't be that she has no family or moral values........or could it? I mean we already know she has no ethical values and is a consummate liar. And that she has the shortest memory ever recorded for remembering her own misdeeds. Early onset Alzheimer's?

It looks like a chameleon will be sitting in the oval office........

Trump threatens to sue NY Times.  Times says: "Go fuck yourself." Hillary-Clinton-fingertips-to-head-AP-Photo-640x480-640x480

Sal

Sal

gatorfan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

Of course it only matters now! When Bill paid Paula Jones $850,000 for her to go away after doing a live Weiner show, causing many others to come out of the closet with similar harassment stories and forcing Hillary to screech in protest that they were all liars - well it's just another Clinton double standard.

Why is she still "married" to Bill? I know of no other woman who would tolerate a spouses abusive behavior toward so many women over so many years. It couldn't be that she has no family or moral values........or could it? I mean we already know she has no ethical values and is a consummate liar. And that she has the shortest memory ever recorded for remembering her own misdeeds. Early onset Alzheimer's?

It looks like a chameleon will be sitting in the oval office........


Ummm ...

... weren't Bill Clinton's dalliances litigated and explored to an exhausting degree ...

... seems like I remember something like that happening ...

... might of been the 90's??

And, if paying a settlement is an admission of guilt, then Donald Trump is guilty of a whole buttload of shade.

As for the state of the Clinton's marriage, you should be ashamed to stoop so low as to wildly speculate and cast aspersions about something about which you could know precisely nothing.

Vikingwoman



Melania Trump, get this, had her lawyer send a letter to People threatening to sue because the reporter who accused Trump of assault said she met her Melania) on the street a year afterward and Melania said that is false. I'm not kidding! They printed the letter to People from her lawyers. Melania wants a retraction and an apology or she's going to sue. Nothing about the assault. LOL!

gatorfan



Sal wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

Of course it only matters now! When Bill paid Paula Jones $850,000 for her to go away after doing a live Weiner show, causing many others to come out of the closet with similar harassment stories and forcing Hillary to screech in protest that they were all liars - well it's just another Clinton double standard.

Why is she still "married" to Bill? I know of no other woman who would tolerate a spouses abusive behavior toward so many women over so many years. It couldn't be that she has no family or moral values........or could it? I mean we already know she has no ethical values and is a consummate liar. And that she has the shortest memory ever recorded for remembering her own misdeeds. Early onset Alzheimer's?

It looks like a chameleon will be sitting in the oval office........


Ummm ...

... weren't Bill Clinton's dalliances litigated and explored to an exhausting degree ...

... seems like I remember something like that happening ...

... might of been the 90's??

And, if paying a settlement is an admission of guilt, then Donald Trump is guilty of a whole buttload of shade.

As for the state of the Clinton's marriage, you should be ashamed to stoop so low as to wildly speculate and cast aspersions about something about which you could know precisely nothing.

What a hoot! Your imaginary translation of my post is typical of the twists and bends around your agenda running rampant in your "mind".

I get it, so you feel it's OK for married folk to run around on their spouses in your world and then display incredible hypocrisy when someone you don't like does it. You live in a simpler world apparently where vows don't matter in select situations.

To refresh your memory that has apparently faded over time (and to prove I'm not "casting aspersions") here you go, a list separated by admitted and unproven incidents (and BTW, like WJC, the Trumpet hasn't been tried or found guilty of any of the claims made against him although given the fact he's a freak I can surely believe many are true):

Consensual affairs

Gennifer Flowers — a model and actress whose claims of a long-term affair nearly wrecked Clinton’s first run for the presidency in 1992. (Clinton denied her claims at the time, but under oath in 1998 he acknowledged a sexual encounter with her.)

Monica Lewinsky — intern at the White House, whose affair with Clinton fueled impeachment charges. This was a consensual affair, in which Lewinsky was an eager participant; she was 22 when the affair started and Clinton was her boss.

Dolly Kyle Browning — A high school friend who said in a sworn declaration that she had had a 22-year off-and-on sexual relationship with Clinton.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen — a former Miss America who said she had a one-night stand with Clinton while he was governor — and she was married. She went public to specifically deny reports he had forced himself on her.

Myra Belle “Sally” Miller — the 1958 Miss Arkansas who said in 1992 that she had had an affair with Clinton in 1983. She claimed that she had been warned not to go public by a Democratic Party official: “They knew that I went jogging by myself and he couldn’t guarantee what would happen to my pretty little legs.”

Some might argue that because Lewinsky and Gracen had relations when Clinton was in a position of executive authority, Clinton engaged in sexual harassment. Certainly an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claim could have been filed, though these women did not take that opportunity.

Allegations of an unwanted sexual encounter

Paula Jones — A former Arkansas state employee who alleged that in 1991 Clinton, while governor, propositioned her and exposed himself. She later filed a sexual harassment suit, and it was during a deposition in that suit that Clinton initially denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky. Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives over the matter, but acquitted in the Senate. Clinton in 1998 settled the suit for $850,000, with no apology or admission of guilt. All but $200,000 was directed to pay legal fees.
Juanita Broaddrick — The nursing home administrator emerged after the impeachment trial to allege that 21 years earlier Clinton had raped her. Through an attorney, Clinton denied the claim, and there were inconsistencies in her story. However, several of her friends backed her claim. No charges were ever brought. (Here’s a link to the Dateline NBC interview with her in 1999.)

Kathleen Willey — The former White House aide said Clinton groped her in his office in 1993, on the same day when her husband, facing embezzlement charges, died in an apparent suicide. (During a deposition in the Paula Jones matter, Willey initially said she had no recollection about whether Clinton kissed her and insisted he did not fondle her.) Clinton denied he assaulted her; an independent prosecutor concluded “there is insufficient evidence to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that President Clinton’s testimony regarding Kathleen Willey was false.”

Note that no court of law ever found Clinton guilty of the accusations.

Peter Baker, in “The Breach,” the definitive account of the impeachment saga, reported that House investigators later found in the files of the independent prosecutor that Jones’s lawyers had collected the names of 21 different women they suspected had had a sexual relationship with Clinton. Baker described the files as “wild allegations, sometimes based on nothing more than hearsay claims of third-party witnesses.” But there were some allegations (page 138) that suggested unwelcome advances:

“One woman was alleged to have been asked by Clinton to give him oral sex in a car while he was the state attorney general (a claim she denied). A former Arkansas state employee said that during a presentation, then-Governor Clinton walked behind her and rubbed his pelvis up against her repeatedly. A woman identified as a third cousin of Clinton’s supposedly told her drug counselor during treatment in Arkansas that she was abused by Clinton when she was baby-sitting at the Governor’s Mansion in Little Rock.”

Update: We were focused on stories that emerged during Clinton’s presidency. But many readers have also urged us to include a reference to Clinton’s post-presidential travels on aircraft owned by convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein. Gawker reported that flight logs show that Clinton, among others, traveled through Africa in 2002 on a jet with “an actress in softcore porn movies whose name appears in Epstein’s address book under an entry for ‘massages.’” Chauntae Davies, the actress, declined to discuss why she was on the flight. Clinton has not commented.

The Bottom Line

Trump’s claim is a bit too vague for a fact check. In any case, we imagine readers will have widely divergent reactions to this list of admitted affairs and unproven allegations of unwanted sexual encounters. But at least you now know the specific cases that Trump is referencing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/12/30/a-guide-to-the-allegations-of-bill-clintons-womanizing/

boards of FL

boards of FL

I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.


_________________
I approve this message.

gatorfan



boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

And I'm not surprised that I must explain to you, Liar Boy, that I said the trumpster is a freak and I'm sure there is truth to at least some of the allegations. Keep cherry picking Douche.

It's hard to take a publicly documented liar like you seriously.

boards of FL

boards of FL

gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

And I'm not surprised that I must explain to you, Liar Boy, that I said the trumpster is a freak and I'm sure there is truth to at least some of the allegations. Keep cherry picking Douche.

It's hard to take a publicly documented liar like you seriously.



How on earth am I a publicly documented liar, hambone? Or are you flippy? It's hard to keep track.


_________________
I approve this message.

2seaoat



I never voted for Bill Clinton. I loved Bush Sr. and proudly cast my vote for him. I met Bob Dole who was a good man, and I voted for him. So why in the hell do I care about Bill Clinton 20 plus years after the allegations which allowed me to vote for Republicans. How in any way is any of this relevant to Donald Trump announcing that he sexually assaults women, and at least 8 women have now stepped forward confirming the same, while young girls who were dressing are reporting this man would walk into the dressing room when they were nude. Dear God, the election is between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, and I would have never voted for Trump if none of this sexual assault drama ever happened. The man has shown he is a sociopath. I just do not get anybody defending this guy.......at so many levels this is about morality. We each make those decisions. This is not a difficult decision for me independent what he has done to women. He is an evil man and the proof of the same was ample during the Republican primary, but for whatever reason, sex and weakness in regard to the same, change folks votes.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:Trump likes to tell everyone that "I'm really smart."  Judging by the intellect of his foam-at-the-mouth supporters, it's clear that Trump is a genius.

To people with an IQ above 70, Trump comes across as a dangerously unstable carnival barker seducing rubes to buy a $1 ticket, go inside the tent, and watch a three-titted woman pickup a silver dollar from a table with her Gina.    

By comparison, George W. Bush -- the last idiot we somehow let into the White House --- is a nerdy choir boy.  

By the way, it would not be difficult for the NY Times to ascertain if Trump was aboard the airliner -- and where he sat and who was next to him --  where one of his alleged sexual assaults took place.  In the following link you'll have the fun of reading the NY Times' response to Trump's threatening letter.   It's a hoot!

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/new-york-times-trump-bring-it

Please show us all the direct quote from the NEW YORK TIMES saying to Donald Trump's threat of a lawsuit, "GO FUCK YOURSELF". The link to the New York Times, where they make that statement would be helpful.

You put it in quotes so obviously, you intended to show it as a quotation from the New York Times.

If you cannot, then wouldn't that be a

Trump threatens to sue NY Times.  Times says: "Go fuck yourself." 69d74526-818e-455c-b628-ad5ce7381bb2

gatorfan



boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

And I'm not surprised that I must explain to you, Liar Boy, that I said the trumpster is a freak and I'm sure there is truth to at least some of the allegations. Keep cherry picking Douche.

It's hard to take a publicly documented liar like you seriously.



How on earth am I a publicly documented liar, hambone?  Or are you flippy?  It's hard to keep track.

I realize you're pretty dense but this ought to be easy even for a liar like you. Remember the "poll" YOU started about whether Markle should be banned???? I didn't think so. You lost the contest and started your usual BoFshit. You are a liar - plain and simple. Your move Douche.

Vikingwoman



gatorfan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

Of course it only matters now! When Bill paid Paula Jones $850,000 for her to go away after doing a live Weiner show, causing many others to come out of the closet with similar harassment stories and forcing Hillary to screech in protest that they were all liars - well it's just another Clinton double standard.

Why is she still "married" to Bill? I know of no other woman who would tolerate a spouses abusive behavior toward so many women over so many years. It couldn't be that she has no family or moral values........or could it? I mean we already know she has no ethical values and is a consummate liar. And that she has the shortest memory ever recorded for remembering her own misdeeds. Early onset Alzheimer's?

It looks like a chameleon will be sitting in the oval office........

Trump threatens to sue NY Times.  Times says: "Go fuck yourself." Hillary-Clinton-fingertips-to-head-AP-Photo-640x480-640x480

With the exception of Brodderick all the woman signed affidavits Clinton never touched them. No, we don't know she is a consummate liar but we do know Trump is. Many women stay w/ cheaters and I'm betting Melania Trump is going to be one. If you don't like Hillary's marriage I'm sure she doesn't care. You don't have to be in it and it has nothing to do w/ her being President.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Trump likes to tell everyone that "I'm really smart."  Judging by the intellect of his foam-at-the-mouth supporters, it's clear that Trump is a genius.

To people with an IQ above 70, Trump comes across as a dangerously unstable carnival barker seducing rubes to buy a $1 ticket, go inside the tent, and watch a three-titted woman pickup a silver dollar from a table with her Gina.    

By comparison, George W. Bush -- the last idiot we somehow let into the White House --- is a nerdy choir boy.  

By the way, it would not be difficult for the NY Times to ascertain if Trump was aboard the airliner -- and where he sat and who was next to him --  where one of his alleged sexual assaults took place.  In the following link you'll have the fun of reading the NY Times' response to Trump's threatening letter.   It's a hoot!

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/new-york-times-trump-bring-it

Please show us all the direct quote from the NEW YORK TIMES saying to Donald Trump's threat of a lawsuit, "GO FUCK YOURSELF".  The link to the New York Times, where they make that statement would be helpful.

You put it in quotes so obviously, you intended to show it as a quotation from the New York Times.

If you cannot, then wouldn't that be a

Trump threatens to sue NY Times.  Times says: "Go fuck yourself." 69d74526-818e-455c-b628-ad5ce7381bb2

the link I provided shows the Times' letter to Trump's attorney, in which they refuse to withdraw the stories of Trump's molestations.  You're right.  I shouldn't have put quotes before and after the go fuck yourself Times' answer to Trump.  They merely refused to withdraw the stories which, when added to all the new ones are sinking your fascist, racist icon.  "Go fuck yourself." And by the way why does your liar cartoon character have black features? Never mind ... we know why!

Guest


Guest

Oh... the race card... we get it. Nice try comrade.

boards of FL

boards of FL

gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

And I'm not surprised that I must explain to you, Liar Boy, that I said the trumpster is a freak and I'm sure there is truth to at least some of the allegations. Keep cherry picking Douche.

It's hard to take a publicly documented liar like you seriously.



How on earth am I a publicly documented liar, hambone?  Or are you flippy?  It's hard to keep track.

I realize you're pretty dense but this ought to be easy even for a liar like you. Remember the "poll" YOU started about whether Markle should be banned???? I didn't think so. You lost the contest and started your usual BoFshit. You are a liar - plain and simple. Your move Douche.


I won that election. It was only when Joani rallied former members over at Pensacola Daily to come over, sign in, and vote that the scales tipped in Markle's favor. The goal of the poll was to gauge the preferences of those who actually use this forum, not to simply manipulate voting so that one number was bigger than the other. I suspect that if I asked people to register and vote that pro-Markle voters would have flipped, so I'm amazed that I need to explain to you why we don't count votes from people who don't use this forum anymore.

Well, actually no, I'm not. I think everyone here has come to realize by now that you're a few investigations shy of a GOP scandal, hambone. Or is it flippy?


_________________
I approve this message.

gatorfan



boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

And I'm not surprised that I must explain to you, Liar Boy, that I said the trumpster is a freak and I'm sure there is truth to at least some of the allegations. Keep cherry picking Douche.

It's hard to take a publicly documented liar like you seriously.



How on earth am I a publicly documented liar, hambone?  Or are you flippy?  It's hard to keep track.

I realize you're pretty dense but this ought to be easy even for a liar like you. Remember the "poll" YOU started about whether Markle should be banned???? I didn't think so. You lost the contest and started your usual BoFshit. You are a liar - plain and simple. Your move Douche.


I won that election.  It was only when Joani rallied former members over at Pensacola Daily to come over, sign in, and vote that the scales tipped in Markle's favor.   The goal of the poll was to gauge the preferences of those who actually use this forum, not to simply manipulate voting so that one number was bigger than the other.  I suspect that if I asked people to register and vote that pro-Markle voters would have flipped, so I'm amazed that I need to explain to you why we don't count votes from people who don't use this forum anymore.

Well, actually no,  I'm not.   I think everyone here has come to realize by now that you're a few investigations shy of a GOP scandal, hambone.  Or is it flippy?

What a pile of BoFShit..... Paranoid much Liar? Jabronis like you usually are. ROFLMAO

Trump threatens to sue NY Times.  Times says: "Go fuck yourself." 4d9

Sal

Sal

gatorfan wrote:

What a pile of BoFShit..... Paranoid much Liar? Jabronis like you usually are. ROFLMAO


Say, how are things over there at Eric's sleepy little knitting circle for fragile self-esteems?

gatorfan



Sal wrote:
gatorfan wrote:

What a pile of BoFShit..... Paranoid much Liar? Jabronis like you usually are. ROFLMAO


Say, how are things over there at Eric's sleepy little knitting circle for fragile self-esteems?

Well I just wouldn't know BoF Junior.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

gatorfan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:So now sexual harassment matters. We get it.

Of course it only matters now! When Bill paid Paula Jones $850,000 for her to go away after doing a live Weiner show, causing many others to come out of the closet with similar harassment stories and forcing Hillary to screech in protest that they were all liars - well it's just another Clinton double standard.

Why is she still "married" to Bill? I know of no other woman who would tolerate a spouses abusive behavior toward so many women over so many years. It couldn't be that she has no family or moral values........or could it? I mean we already know she has no ethical values and is a consummate liar. And that she has the shortest memory ever recorded for remembering her own misdeeds. Early onset Alzheimer's?

It looks like a chameleon will be sitting in the oval office........

Trump threatens to sue NY Times.  Times says: "Go fuck yourself." Hillary-Clinton-fingertips-to-head-AP-Photo-640x480-640x480
cheers

boards of FL

boards of FL

gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

And I'm not surprised that I must explain to you, Liar Boy, that I said the trumpster is a freak and I'm sure there is truth to at least some of the allegations. Keep cherry picking Douche.

It's hard to take a publicly documented liar like you seriously.



How on earth am I a publicly documented liar, hambone?  Or are you flippy?  It's hard to keep track.

I realize you're pretty dense but this ought to be easy even for a liar like you. Remember the "poll" YOU started about whether Markle should be banned???? I didn't think so. You lost the contest and started your usual BoFshit. You are a liar - plain and simple. Your move Douche.


I won that election.  It was only when Joani rallied former members over at Pensacola Daily to come over, sign in, and vote that the scales tipped in Markle's favor.   The goal of the poll was to gauge the preferences of those who actually use this forum, not to simply manipulate voting so that one number was bigger than the other.  I suspect that if I asked people to register and vote that pro-Markle voters would have flipped, so I'm amazed that I need to explain to you why we don't count votes from people who don't use this forum anymore.

Well, actually no,  I'm not.   I think everyone here has come to realize by now that you're a few investigations shy of a GOP scandal, hambone.  Or is it flippy?

What a pile of BoFShit..... Paranoid much Liar? Jabronis like you usually are. ROFLMAO


It's not that I'm paranoid. It's that you're just stupid.

And speaking of stupid, why hasn't your sidekick rejoined over here? Which one of you is hambone and which is flippy? It seems kinda odd that you two post on different forums now. Is your relationship on the rocks or something?


_________________
I approve this message.

Markle

Markle

boards of FL wrote:I'll be honest, gatorfan.  I'm really not that concerned with a politician engaging in consensual affairs.  Having an affair is bad, of course, but if I were to be concerned with that in politics it is an unfortunate truth that that would likely exclude the majority of politicians outright - particularly Donald Trump.  In fact, I just sort of assume that most politicians are engaging in consensual affairs.

So let's put the consensual affairs aside, and we're left with three allegations of sexual assault for Bill Clinton.  Nearly $80 million was spent on independent investigations of these allegations and two were deemed to be unlikely:  Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.  Juanita Broaddrick is the one that could be taken most seriously out of the three, though as your own link concedes there were inconsistencies in her story which cast doubt on the accusation.  Then again, she has friends backing her up which would seem to bolster the accusation.  But my point is at the end of the day, we have one accusation to take seriously and it isn't exactly certain that it is truthful.  On the other hand, we have Donald Trump in his own words confessing - bragging - about sexually assaulting women and walking in on them in dressing rooms while they're naked.  Then we have those women coming out and corroborating his claims.  This puts the accusations of Donald Trump in an entirely separate universe from those of Clinton.

And I'm not surprised that this must be explained to you, analysis boy.

As you know, Bill Clinton is a rapist and has committed sexual assault.

Had Donald Trump done anything like that, being a billionaire, why didn't Gloria Alred, or whoever, jump up and sue him for a gigantic payday?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum