Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

If Clinton's Emails were all a mistake, why so many immunity deals ?

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/09/29/jason-chaffetz-nails-clinton-emails-mistake-everyone-pleading-5th-395522?utm_source=federalist&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=09%2F30%2F16ct

Sal

Sal

Ahem ...

FBI Director James Comey said Tuesday his investigators looked very intently at whether there was obstruction of justice in the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email account, but concluded they could not prove a criminal case against anyone.

"We looked at it very hard to see if there was criminal obstruction of justice," Comey said at a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, under questioning by Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)

"We looked at it very hard. We could not make an obstruction case against any of the subjects we looked at," Comey said. He did not identify those whose conduct the FBI investigated for potential obstruction.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/09/clinton-email-probe-obstruction-fbi-228790

What he's saying here is that the Bureau exerted a lot of effort into discovering the truth, including handing out immunity like "Halloween candy", but they came up empty, because Clinton and her staff did nothing criminal.

And, once again PeeDawg finds himself chowing down on another nothing burger.

2seaoat



You offer immunity to try to get answers in an investigation. It was hardball against Hillary Clinton by a Republican FBI Director. Most FBI investigations would simply say there was no crime committed after the investigation......however, when Bankers and Wall Street topple our economy and 17 trillion is lost, not one immunity offer or one prosecution......no explanation why no indictments, and they sealed files for five years......poor Pace is clueless.

Guest


Guest

Criminals all.... Including you folks who cover for her.

Guest


Guest

She intentionally set up a non-secure, non-government system... making it inevitable that classified information would be mishandled... and that federal record keeping laws would be flaunted. She directed the mishandling of classified govt info by having dos techs access the she server that had NO security clearance. She was responsible for the tech companies copying, transferring, and then deleting classified govt records... again done by private techs with NO security clearance. Cmon... that's incompetent... or corrupt. It wouldn't take a maxwell Smart to steal everything that she was entrusted to protect. We're damn lucky that her self entitlement didn't kill Americans and compromise our agents... if it didn't.

2seaoat



She did basically what all prior SOS did and was found to have not done a thing which was criminal, yet once more when we have a coked out candidate who is tweeting at 3am about beauty contestants porn films when he has been in a porn film, and who actually has broke the law and will be indicted, you insist in wasting our time with your non relevant innuendo......heck.....even you can identify a coke head......and as governor Dean who is a doctor said on TV this morning......if innuendo is the new standard......then when will we look at Trump's cocaine problem......The hell with releasing his taxes......release a drug test. time for a urine test. innuendo is the new gold standard......right?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum