Regarding Huma Abedin, her terrorist ties and Hillary Clinton :
Hillary's campaign put out a statement today that Huma's role in the Islamic Extremist publication (as reported by the New York Post yesterday) was not an Active Role.
Really?
Active role, passive role, who cares - Why the hell should the specifics of her role that make a difference?
Huma, while on Hillary Clinton's staff, served in a position at an America hating, radical jihad, Islamic terrorism promoting publication for over a decade.
Huma's MOTHER is now the acting Editor in Chief.
How is this not a problem?
-2016 Bradley Scott Reisman
Hillary's campaign put out a statement today that Huma's role in the Islamic Extremist publication (as reported by the New York Post yesterday) was not an Active Role.
Really?
Active role, passive role, who cares - Why the hell should the specifics of her role that make a difference?
Huma, while on Hillary Clinton's staff, served in a position at an America hating, radical jihad, Islamic terrorism promoting publication for over a decade.
Huma's MOTHER is now the acting Editor in Chief.
How is this not a problem?
-2016 Bradley Scott Reisman