Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Every Month This Year Has Been the Hottest in Recorded History

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

boards of FL

boards of FL

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/july-hottest-noaa-nasa-climate-environment-global


Despite the cruise ship that’s now plowing through a melting Arctic, or the wildfires that have consumed parts of North America, and devastating drought that's stricken in East Africa, it can still be easy to ignore sometimes that our climate is rapidly changing. But 2016 has been a remarkable year for record-breaking temperatures, and even in the midst of it, July stands out as the hottest month of all.

On Wednesday, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced that July was the hottest month ever recorded on our planet, since modern record-keeping began in 1880.

Every Month This Year Has Been the Hottest in Recorded History CqEdCZMWgAALidg

NASA has reached the same conclusion. July smashed all previous records.

Every Month This Year Has Been the Hottest in Recorded History Cp7TXFaWAAAIxgD
Keep in mind that July almost always stands out as the warmest month in a given year, across the planet. “July is, climatologically speaking, the world’s warmest month of the year,” NOAA climatologist Ahira Sanchez-Lugo told me in an interview. That’s because the Northern hemisphere “has more landmass, and less ocean” than the South, she continued, and the land heats up more quickly.

But this July was the hottest month recorded on Earth, ever—beating the previous record, which was actually just set the July before.

Every Month This Year Has Been the Hottest in Recorded History 1471457053315178

Image: Ebony-Renee Baker

Temperature records are falling like dominoes, month after month, year after year. Although July stands out, each consecutive month in 2016 has broken its own previous record (May was the hottest May, April the hottest April, etc.) Consider this:

June 2016 was the hottest on record.

So was May.

April smashed previous temperature records.

March did by a long shot.

February and January were the hottest ever.

Every Month This Year Has Been the Hottest in Recorded History 1471456090241567
Image: NOAA

“The streak of consecutive records started in May 2015,” Sanchez-Lugo told me. We’ve now lapped ourselves, and are starting to break records set within this same streak, last year.

According to the NOAA, July was the fifteenth month in a row where the global land and ocean temperature was the highest recorded since 1880. “This marks the longest such streak in NOAA’s 137 years of record keeping,” its report says. (NASA’s analysis varies, but only slightly: It calls July the tenth record-breaking month in a row.)

It seems pretty certain that 2016 will go down in history as the hottest recorded year on Earth, although we’ll have to wait for the data to confirm that. If and when that happens, this will be the third record-breaking year in a row, which would be a new record in itself: Let’s not forget that 2015 set its own annual temperature record, breaking the one set in 2014.

“We should be absolutely concerned,” Sanchez-Lugo said. “We need to look at ways to adapt and mitigate. If we don’t, temperatures will continue to increase.”

Next year is expected to be slightly less intense, with the fierce El Niño we’ve been experiencing now abating. But the truth is that record-breaking temperatures, month after month, year after year, are starting to look less like an exception, more like the norm.


_________________
I approve this message.

2seaoat



The science cannot be refuted. There is 5% more water in the Atmosphere since Ronald Reagan was President. The severity of swings in weather from drought to flooding has been clear. In each of the flood events in the last three years we are seeing 1000 year floods regularly......four or five a year in the last three years and the climate change deniers who are paid shills for Oil and Coal interests are costing America trillions of dollars to have their special interests served in Congress. It is disgraceful that it has taken a decade. I have personally seen six five hundred year floods on a river system in the last 13 years and I know of no reasonable person who denies the science.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

2seaoat wrote:The science cannot be refuted.   There is 5% more water in the Atmosphere since Ronald Reagan was President.  The severity of swings in weather from drought to flooding has been clear.   In each of the flood events in the last three years we are seeing 1000 year floods regularly......four or five a year in the last three years and the climate change deniers who are paid shills for Oil and Coal interests are costing America trillions of dollars to have their special interests served in Congress.  It is disgraceful that it has taken a decade.  I have personally seen six five hundred year floods on a river system in the last 13 years and I know of no reasonable person who denies the science.

Just one question.
You say the science of meteorology and weather forecasting is no better than throwing darts at a dart board.
So if I accept what you say about that as being valid, why would I believe science can be sure about climate change?

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I'll go ahead and give seaoat's reply.

"The only reason you ask this question is because you're a dixiecrat racist who was educated by the worst schools in the country to love Donald Trump and listen to racist dixiecrat music like the Allman Brothers".

lol

Sal

Sal

Let's see ...

... the 2016 GOP platform promised to cancel the EPA's Clean Power Plan, build the Keystone XL pipeline and more like it, kill federal fracking regulations, oppose any carbon tax, expedite export terminals for liquefied natural gas, abolish the EPA as we know it, stop environmental regulatory agencies from settling lawsuits out of court, forbid the EPA from regulating carbon dioxide, and halt funding for the UN's Framework Convention on Climate Change.

I guess the GOP doesn't have much use for science.

2seaoat



If you had attended your high school classes(then again not attending might not have been a bad idea) you would understand that forecasting and event at a specific location seven days out has a very low probability which is confirmed over and over again by the low efficacy of forecasts going beyond a day or two.


However climate scientist never forecast a specific event, but that the probability of certain events will increase. They simply need a preponderance of the evidence that a general class of events will happen as climate changes. They do not try to predict the date and time of a LA flood. They simply say that there will be an increase of weather events of a particular kind.

A weather forecaster who goes beyond the science get people killed. Ivan was supposed to hit NO.....they gave warnings.....people acted......the same for Dennis.......but when Katrina came.......wolf had been called out too many times by incompetent weather forecasters which fail to give probabilities which even approach certainty in future specific weather events impacting a specific geographic location.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Then obviously we need to totally ignore anything the National Hurricane Center or NOAA tells us about where hurricanes are going to go.
They always do nothing but give out false alarms because they're pseudoscientists and quacks.
I wish I'd gone to those top flight Illinois schools where they would have taught me that like they did you.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

2seaoat wrote:

Ivan was supposed to hit NO.....they gave warnings.....people acted......the same for Dennis"....

Same what for Dennis?  That it was "supposed to go to New Orleans"?
That the track forecast was way off?

Bullshit.  Here are the track forecasts over time for Dennis.  As you can plainly see,  the track forecast was spot on.  
And it demonstrates that you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to hurricane forecasting.  Just like Donald Trump,  you just make up whatever sounds good to you.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/DENNIS_graphics.shtml

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum