Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Something you republicans/conservatives should know about Rubio before you decide to support him.

+2
ZVUGKTUBM
Hospital Bob
6 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I'm assuming you know who Mark Levin is.  If not,  then you're so uninformed that it's pointless to even try to point this out to you so just keep on supporting Rubio in a state of ignorance and ignore the rest of this post.

According to Mark Levin,  Rubio is a military "interventionist" along the lines of John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
I like that term "interventionist" because it so well describes the neocons and the little punks like Rubio who came along after them.

An interventionist is not someone who is "strong on defense".  An interventionist is someone who loves war like pacedog and markle.

Guest


Guest

Cruz is the same.

Not voting for either.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

SheWrites wrote:Cruz is the same.

Not voting for either.

I may not be able to vote for Gil Fulbright either.  So far he's not taken a position on this.  But if he wants my vote,  he'll have to.
I'm fed up to my eyeballs with this goddamn interventionism.  Especially with these punks like Rubio and the rest who have never put their own asses on the line to do the intervening.
At least that's one thing you can't say about that PTSD nutjob McCain.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

PkrBum wrote:Hillary is the same.

Well in that case both Hillary and Rubio need to join the Army and get their asses over there and start getting blown up with the rest of them. 
And frankly I wouldn't care if they did get blown up because there's plenty more narcissist politicians to take the place of both of them.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Bob wrote:I'm fed up to my eyeballs with this goddamn interventionism.  Especially with these punks like Rubio and the rest who have never put their own asses on the line to do the intervening.

The most important issue to me in the 2016 vote is voting for a candidate who will "just say no" to engaging in militarism. I have really taken a 180 degree turn from my younger self, when I was a die-hard conservative. We had different enemies in those days, when the emphasis was on waging the Cold War.  

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

gatorfan



If you look at this HRC is even more of an interventionist (hawk) based on statements she has made.

http://www.cato.org/blog/2016-presidential-candidate-intervention-meter

boards of FL

boards of FL

gatorfan wrote:If you look at this HRC is even more of an interventionist (hawk) based on statements she has made.

http://www.cato.org/blog/2016-presidential-candidate-intervention-meter


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, Clinton is the most hawkish remaining candidate of the entire field of both parties.  Yes.  And Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck.  And this information comes courtesy of Koch Industries.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Hey, PkrBum, this may be a good time to queue up that 'useful idiots' phrase.


_________________
I approve this message.

gatorfan



boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:If you look at this HRC is even more of an interventionist (hawk) based on statements she has made.

http://www.cato.org/blog/2016-presidential-candidate-intervention-meter


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, Clinton is the most hawkish remaining candidate of the entire field of both parties.  Yes.  And Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck.  And this information comes courtesy of Koch Industries.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Hey, PkrBum, this may be a good time to queue up that 'useful idiots' phrase.

What a shallow minded loon

"Hillary Clinton Promises A More Muscular Foreign Policy As President
From Iran to Syria to Ukraine, Clinton wants the U.S. to be more aggressive."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-iran-foreign-policy_us_55f05c2ae4b002d5c07786b2

polecat

polecat

gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:If you look at this HRC is even more of an interventionist (hawk) based on statements she has made.

http://www.cato.org/blog/2016-presidential-candidate-intervention-meter


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, Clinton is the most hawkish remaining candidate of the entire field of both parties.  Yes.  And Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck.  And this information comes courtesy of Koch Industries.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Hey, PkrBum, this may be a good time to queue up that 'useful idiots' phrase.

What a shallow minded loon

"Hillary Clinton Promises A More Muscular Foreign Policy As President
From Iran to Syria to Ukraine, Clinton wants the U.S. to be more aggressive."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-iran-foreign-policy_us_55f05c2ae4b002d5c07786b2


Something you republicans/conservatives should know about Rubio before you decide to support him. Got-real-llama-1314387922

boards of FL

boards of FL

gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:If you look at this HRC is even more of an interventionist (hawk) based on statements she has made.

http://www.cato.org/blog/2016-presidential-candidate-intervention-meter


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, Clinton is the most hawkish remaining candidate of the entire field of both parties.  Yes.  And Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck.  And this information comes courtesy of Koch Industries.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Hey, PkrBum, this may be a good time to queue up that 'useful idiots' phrase.

What a shallow minded loon

"Hillary Clinton Promises A More Muscular Foreign Policy As President
From Iran to Syria to Ukraine, Clinton wants the U.S. to be more aggressive."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-iran-foreign-policy_us_55f05c2ae4b002d5c07786b2



Great article, though it doesn't support your original assertion - which is that Clinton is the most hawkish of all remaining candidates across both parties.

And you didn't even address the part where I pointed out how Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck in terms of their likelihood of intervening, according to your cato article.  Do you agree with that analysis?  I mean, here you have Charles Koch telling you that Clinton is the most hawkish candidate, and that even Bernie Sanders is hawkish enough to be roughly a statistical tie with Ted Cruz.  

I'll ask you this honestly, gatorfan.  Using your best judgement here, putting on your thinking cap and concentrating very deeply on this subject, how much stock do you place in this cato link that you have posted?


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
gatorfan wrote:If you look at this HRC is even more of an interventionist (hawk) based on statements she has made.

http://www.cato.org/blog/2016-presidential-candidate-intervention-meter


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, Clinton is the most hawkish remaining candidate of the entire field of both parties.  Yes.  And Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck.  And this information comes courtesy of Koch Industries.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Hey, PkrBum, this may be a good time to queue up that 'useful idiots' phrase.

What a shallow minded loon

"Hillary Clinton Promises A More Muscular Foreign Policy As President
From Iran to Syria to Ukraine, Clinton wants the U.S. to be more aggressive."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-iran-foreign-policy_us_55f05c2ae4b002d5c07786b2



Great article, though it doesn't support your original assertion - which is that Clinton is the most hawkish of all remaining candidates across both parties.

And you didn't even address the part where I pointed out how Bernie and Cruz are neck and neck in terms of their likelihood of intervening, according to your cato article.  Do you agree with that analysis?  I mean, here you have Charles Koch telling you that Clinton is the most hawkish candidate, and that even Bernie Sanders is hawkish enough to be roughly a statistical tie with Ted Cruz.  

I'll ask you this honestly, gatorfan.  Using your best judgement here, putting on your thinking cap and concentrating very deeply on this subject, how much stock do you place in this cato link that you have posted?


So...do you not know?  Is this all too tough to digest?  I mean, on one hand we have Ted "I'll carpet bomb them until the sand dunes glow" Cruz, and on  the other we have Bernie "Democratic Socialist" Sanders.  

Do you not know or have any opinion on which of these two candidates seems like the bigger war hawk?


_________________
I approve this message.

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

ABH

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum