Salinsky wrote:So, what we've determined so far, other than the fact that you don't use political terms correctly, is that the only thing the two candidates share in common is that they are both anti-establishment.
If the only thing you find appealing about them is their anti-establishmentism, why aren't you high on Bernie, Bob?
On one hand, you have a rich, vulgar, reality TV star who has left a long line of failed business ventures and other tawdry affairs in his wake.
Now, I know that you would point to Ronald Reagan's presidency in response to criticism of Trump's lousy record of achievements, but if you're willing to take a look at the result of 35 years of experimenting with trickle down economics, which was initiated by Saint Ronnie, you have to acknowledge that it's been a dismal failure for the middle class in America.
And, the only policy initiative that the rich vulgarian has outlined in any detail would immediately kneecap the U.S. economy on multiple levels.
On the other hand, you have a principled democratic socialist who has been consistently fighting to level the playing field and strengthen the middle class for decades.
Don't you think that's it's high time that we try a different economic model - one that will free some of the money from the hands of the greedy corporatists and put it back into the hands of the middle class who will spend it.
That's really the only way to get our economy growing at a rate that will enable us to address our structural debt problem.
And, he has laid out specific and detailed policy prescriptions on a multitude of other issues, which you can easily peruse at your leisure.
Maybe, your motivations are not entirely what you claim them to be?
Salinsky, you make me proud to be one of Bernie's worshipers!