Moronic Jusitce Kagan quotes Dr Seuss in dissent brief

http://rare.us/story/in-fishy-opinion-justice-kagan-cites-dr-seuss/

Seriously? What a whack job!

It was brilliant if you are familiar with her reference. Obviously, you did not read the decision or understand her context. I am not surprised.

KarlRove wrote:http://rare.us/story/in-fishy-opinion-justice-kagan-cites-dr-seuss/

Seriously? What a whack job!

What is it that you take issue with here?

by boards of FL Today at 1:51 pm
KarlRove wrote:
“
http://rare.us/story/in-fishy-opinion-justice-kagan-cites-dr-seuss/

Seriously? What a whack job!
”

What is it that you take issue with here?
----
Her reference of law over fish as compared to legal documents which the law actually pertains to. Again, she is whack job.

Let's flash back, shall we?



Because this filibuster, in which he also read from Ayn Rand, was about his opposition to the health care act, this particular choice of reading material was strange and ironic. Theodore Geisel certainly would not have approved.

KarlRove wrote:by boards of FL Today at 1:51 pm
KarlRove wrote:
“
http://rare.us/story/in-fishy-opinion-justice-kagan-cites-dr-seuss/

Seriously? What a whack job!
”

What is it that you take issue with here?
----
Her reference of law over fish as compared to legal documents which the law actually pertains to. Again, she is whack job.

What?  All she said is that fish are tangible objects.  Who would dispute that?  Oh...her partisan colleagues on the bench.

FISH:

She's the only whack job thinkig that. The fish aren't tangible becsuwe they are perishable items.

KarlRove wrote:She's the only whack job thinkig that. The fish aren't tangible becsuwe they are perishable items.

Tell it to the fish. I'm sure they'd be just thrilled to learn how they're not real. If it has escaped your notice (apparently it has), WE are also "perishable items."

Show me a fish a week after it was caught and then thrown into the water per the case she wrote the dissenting opinion for...

KarlRove wrote:She's the only whack job thinkig that. The fish aren't tangible becsuwe they are perishable items.

That law, passed in the wake of Enron’s collapse, bars intentional shredding of documents that, if destroyed, would hinder a federal investigation.

Read more at http://rare.us/story/in-fishy-opinion-justice-kagan-cites-dr-seuss/#AwwwbQtDOqAgspuf.99

I would consider documents shredded by Enron to be perishable items too. They just weren't perishable enough for Enron so they helped them along by shredding.

Yes I know I read the article. That's what makes Kagan look like a jackass.

KarlRove wrote:Yes I know I read the article. That's what makes Kagan look like a jackass.

That's the end for sister Kagen -- War Hero says she looks like a jackass. Take your meds you whiny flunky.

Florida broomrider ,
Cruz read the
Book in a filibuster. Kagan wants to use Dr Suess in an analogous manner on Laws of the nation. There is a difference bat winger

She also wrote ...

"The plurality searches far and wide for anything—anything—to support its interpretation of §1519. But its fishing expedition comes up empty."

She was just being clever and having a bit of fun - two things wingnutz refuse to countenance.

Is a law that might limit the freedom of another American something to laugh about at any time?

yo carl what does Thomas have to say on the subject, oh wait he has not talked to Scalia yet

Read the opinion on the brief and determine thst for Yourself