Bad news for our resident atheists

KarlRove wrote:There's nothing about drones in this thread old fart.

Wordslinger wrote:

KarlRove wrote:There's nothing about drones in this thread old fart.

I'll say this for you Pacedog:  You are very good at being consistently wrong and stupid.

 "We also know another reason as to why decimating wedding parties to get at one or two suspected terrorists is morally superior to people like you.

It's a lot like confronting your demons at hand and discussing them...

*****CHUCKLE*****"

Damaged Eagle's statement above , referring to Obama's use of drones.

Get help with your reading -- wear your contacts.   LOL

Wordslinger wrote:This thread was about a pseudo-scientific claim that God was real.

Will somebody please explain what in hell the use of drones has to do with this premise?

However, considering the weird combination of militaristic aggressiveness with Christian values that seem to propel our resident pretend-hero veteran, his claims that pseudo science supports the case for God's alleged existence has all the credibility of a Christian sect believing that the rattle snake they harass won't bite because Jesus is on their side.

God is great .... LOL

Vikingwoman wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:This thread was about a pseudo-scientific claim that God was real.

Will somebody please explain what in hell the use of drones has to do with this premise?

However, considering the weird combination of militaristic aggressiveness with Christian values that seem to propel our resident pretend-hero veteran, his claims that pseudo science supports the case for God's alleged existence has all the credibility of a Christian sect believing that the rattle snake they harass won't bite because Jesus is on their side.

God is great .... LOL

Thank you for noting this thread was about athiests! WTH Brain Damaged Eagle started talking about Obama and drones is just bizarre. He can't carry on a normal conversation. Must have some kind of schizophrenia.

Wordslinger wrote:

KarlRove wrote:There's nothing about drones in this thread old fart.

I'll say this for you Pacedog:  You are very good at being consistently wrong and stupid.

 "We also know another reason as to why decimating wedding parties to get at one or two suspected terrorists is morally superior to people like you.

It's a lot like confronting your demons at hand and discussing them...

*****CHUCKLE*****"

Damaged Eagle's statement above , referring to Obama's use of drones.

Get help with your reading -- wear your contacts.   LOL

Vikingwoman wrote:No,PD. You're a moron who keeps saying stupid stuff. You get shot down all the time and just keep coming back for more.LOL!

Vikingwoman wrote:Do you enjoy being the village idiot? You must.

Vikingwoman wrote:Do you enjoy being the village idiot? You must.

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Yes.  I must say, Damaged, my neurons simply can't handle this.  Look at all the substantive back and forth posts between myself and 2seaoat, and then you enter with the above sentence fragment that, honestly, I don't even know what you were going for.

That is some seriously deep stuff, right there, Damaged.  Seriously deep.

(exits elevator)

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Run?  There is nothing to run away from.

Except for the demons you create as you wade through the blood and gore of your moral righteousness which you justify with your Darwinist convictions.

Has your Nobel Champion obliterated any more wedding parties of people you believe to be subhuman to get at one or two suspected terrorists?

I'm sure the ethics and morals of a practicing Darwinist can be very comforting to someone like you.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIkINDV0tg

Practicing Darwinist?  What is a practicing Darwinist?

Regarding the rest of your comment, I'm not even quite sure what it is that you're talking about.  Here again, I can only suggest that you learn to communicate coherently at some point in your life.

Since you're a practicing atheist I can only conclude that your morals and ethics come from a scientific standpoint. Considering your belief that decimating a whole lot of people to kill one or two suspecting terrorists is a morally 'superior' stance I can only conclude that you've adopted the attitudes that prevailed during the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.....

Since you're so morally superior that must mean you're part of some master race which makes it perfectly fine, in your mind, to eliminate the 'subhumans' by obliterating as many as you can by bombing them indiscriminately; regardless of collateral damage to other 'subhumans in the area; for your cause.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tAk6Yhvfs



I'm thinkin' you, and your little tag team, understand me just fine.

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Yes.  I must say, Damaged, my neurons simply can't handle this.  Look at all the substantive back and forth posts between myself and 2seaoat, and then you enter with the above sentence fragment that, honestly, I don't even know what you were going for.

That is some seriously deep stuff, right there, Damaged.  Seriously deep.

(exits elevator)

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Run?  There is nothing to run away from.

Except for the demons you create as you wade through the blood and gore of your moral righteousness which you justify with your Darwinist convictions.

Has your Nobel Champion obliterated any more wedding parties of people you believe to be subhuman to get at one or two suspected terrorists?

I'm sure the ethics and morals of a practicing Darwinist can be very comforting to someone like you.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIkINDV0tg

Practicing Darwinist?  What is a practicing Darwinist?

Regarding the rest of your comment, I'm not even quite sure what it is that you're talking about.  Here again, I can only suggest that you learn to communicate coherently at some point in your life.

Since you're a practicing atheist I can only conclude that your morals and ethics come from a scientific standpoint. Considering your belief that decimating a whole lot of people to kill one or two suspecting terrorists is a morally 'superior' stance I can only conclude that you've adopted the attitudes that prevailed during the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.....

Since you're so morally superior that must mean you're part of some master race which makes it perfectly fine, in your mind, to eliminate the 'subhumans' by obliterating as many as you can by bombing them indiscriminately; regardless of collateral damage to other 'subhumans in the area; for your cause.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tAk6Yhvfs



I'm thinkin' you, and your little tag team, understand me just fine.

Ooookay then.  Should you ever figure out what this thread is about and what everyone has actually said and argued for, feel free to see if you can form a coherent response.  

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Yes.  I must say, Damaged, my neurons simply can't handle this.  Look at all the substantive back and forth posts between myself and 2seaoat, and then you enter with the above sentence fragment that, honestly, I don't even know what you were going for.

That is some seriously deep stuff, right there, Damaged.  Seriously deep.

(exits elevator)

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Run?  There is nothing to run away from.

Except for the demons you create as you wade through the blood and gore of your moral righteousness which you justify with your Darwinist convictions.

Has your Nobel Champion obliterated any more wedding parties of people you believe to be subhuman to get at one or two suspected terrorists?

I'm sure the ethics and morals of a practicing Darwinist can be very comforting to someone like you.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIkINDV0tg

Practicing Darwinist?  What is a practicing Darwinist?

Regarding the rest of your comment, I'm not even quite sure what it is that you're talking about.  Here again, I can only suggest that you learn to communicate coherently at some point in your life.

Since you're a practicing atheist I can only conclude that your morals and ethics come from a scientific standpoint. Considering your belief that decimating a whole lot of people to kill one or two suspecting terrorists is a morally 'superior' stance I can only conclude that you've adopted the attitudes that prevailed during the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.....

Since you're so morally superior that must mean you're part of some master race which makes it perfectly fine, in your mind, to eliminate the 'subhumans' by obliterating as many as you can by bombing them indiscriminately; regardless of collateral damage to other 'subhumans in the area; for your cause.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tAk6Yhvfs



I'm thinkin' you, and your little tag team, understand me just fine.

Ooookay then.  Should you ever figure out what this thread is about and what everyone has actually said and argued for, feel free to see if you can form a coherent response.  

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Yes.  I must say, Damaged, my neurons simply can't handle this.  Look at all the substantive back and forth posts between myself and 2seaoat, and then you enter with the above sentence fragment that, honestly, I don't even know what you were going for.

That is some seriously deep stuff, right there, Damaged.  Seriously deep.

(exits elevator)

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Run?  There is nothing to run away from.

Except for the demons you create as you wade through the blood and gore of your moral righteousness which you justify with your Darwinist convictions.

Has your Nobel Champion obliterated any more wedding parties of people you believe to be subhuman to get at one or two suspected terrorists?

I'm sure the ethics and morals of a practicing Darwinist can be very comforting to someone like you.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIkINDV0tg

Practicing Darwinist?  What is a practicing Darwinist?

Regarding the rest of your comment, I'm not even quite sure what it is that you're talking about.  Here again, I can only suggest that you learn to communicate coherently at some point in your life.

Since you're a practicing atheist I can only conclude that your morals and ethics come from a scientific standpoint. Considering your belief that decimating a whole lot of people to kill one or two suspecting terrorists is a morally 'superior' stance I can only conclude that you've adopted the attitudes that prevailed during the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.....

Since you're so morally superior that must mean you're part of some master race which makes it perfectly fine, in your mind, to eliminate the 'subhumans' by obliterating as many as you can by bombing them indiscriminately; regardless of collateral damage to other 'subhumans in the area; for your cause.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tAk6Yhvfs



I'm thinkin' you, and your little tag team, understand me just fine.

Ooookay then.  Should you ever figure out what this thread is about and what everyone has actually said and argued for, feel free to see if you can form a coherent response.  

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

What is it that you feel I'm running from?  Use the quote feature.  Show me where you have directly responded to anything I have said.

I can't be expected to defend your incoherent straw man arguments.  

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Yes.  I must say, Damaged, my neurons simply can't handle this.  Look at all the substantive back and forth posts between myself and 2seaoat, and then you enter with the above sentence fragment that, honestly, I don't even know what you were going for.

That is some seriously deep stuff, right there, Damaged.  Seriously deep.

(exits elevator)

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Run?  There is nothing to run away from.

Except for the demons you create as you wade through the blood and gore of your moral righteousness which you justify with your Darwinist convictions.

Has your Nobel Champion obliterated any more wedding parties of people you believe to be subhuman to get at one or two suspected terrorists?

I'm sure the ethics and morals of a practicing Darwinist can be very comforting to someone like you.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIkINDV0tg

Practicing Darwinist?  What is a practicing Darwinist?

Regarding the rest of your comment, I'm not even quite sure what it is that you're talking about.  Here again, I can only suggest that you learn to communicate coherently at some point in your life.

Since you're a practicing atheist I can only conclude that your morals and ethics come from a scientific standpoint. Considering your belief that decimating a whole lot of people to kill one or two suspecting terrorists is a morally 'superior' stance I can only conclude that you've adopted the attitudes that prevailed during the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.....

Since you're so morally superior that must mean you're part of some master race which makes it perfectly fine, in your mind, to eliminate the 'subhumans' by obliterating as many as you can by bombing them indiscriminately; regardless of collateral damage to other 'subhumans in the area; for your cause.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tAk6Yhvfs



I'm thinkin' you, and your little tag team, understand me just fine.

Ooookay then.  Should you ever figure out what this thread is about and what everyone has actually said and argued for, feel free to see if you can form a coherent response.  

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

What is it that you feel I'm running from?  Use the quote feature.  Show me where you have directly responded to anything I have said.

I can't be expected to defend your incoherent straw man arguments.  

The quote feature has been used to respond to your questions and evasions. The only straw man here is yourself as I poke holes in your 'supposed' morally superior belief system. I've answered all your questions and you've repeatedly avoided answering mine by running to your little pile on the abuse party program in a pathetic attempt to prove you're in some delusional way superior. I realize that for someone like you it's hard to stay in sync with what's going on but you could at least try to follow the conversation and where it leads too.

Have you found a scientific explanation to the little girl and butterfly thingee yet?

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diOuUYcenW0

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Yes.  I must say, Damaged, my neurons simply can't handle this.  Look at all the substantive back and forth posts between myself and 2seaoat, and then you enter with the above sentence fragment that, honestly, I don't even know what you were going for.

That is some seriously deep stuff, right there, Damaged.  Seriously deep.

(exits elevator)

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Run?  There is nothing to run away from.

Except for the demons you create as you wade through the blood and gore of your moral righteousness which you justify with your Darwinist convictions.

Has your Nobel Champion obliterated any more wedding parties of people you believe to be subhuman to get at one or two suspected terrorists?

I'm sure the ethics and morals of a practicing Darwinist can be very comforting to someone like you.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIkINDV0tg

Practicing Darwinist?  What is a practicing Darwinist?

Regarding the rest of your comment, I'm not even quite sure what it is that you're talking about.  Here again, I can only suggest that you learn to communicate coherently at some point in your life.

Since you're a practicing atheist I can only conclude that your morals and ethics come from a scientific standpoint. Considering your belief that decimating a whole lot of people to kill one or two suspecting terrorists is a morally 'superior' stance I can only conclude that you've adopted the attitudes that prevailed during the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.....

Since you're so morally superior that must mean you're part of some master race which makes it perfectly fine, in your mind, to eliminate the 'subhumans' by obliterating as many as you can by bombing them indiscriminately; regardless of collateral damage to other 'subhumans in the area; for your cause.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tAk6Yhvfs



I'm thinkin' you, and your little tag team, understand me just fine.

Ooookay then.  Should you ever figure out what this thread is about and what everyone has actually said and argued for, feel free to see if you can form a coherent response.  

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Run Forest run.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

What is it that you feel I'm running from?  Use the quote feature.  Show me where you have directly responded to anything I have said.

I can't be expected to defend your incoherent straw man arguments.  

The quote feature has been used to respond to your questions and evasions. The only straw man here is yourself as I poke holes in your 'supposed' morally superior belief system. I've answered all your questions and you've repeatedly avoided answering mine by running to your little pile on the abuse party program in a pathetic attempt to prove you're in some delusional way superior. I realize that for someone like you it's hard to stay in sync with what's going on but you could at least try to follow the conversation and where it leads too.

Have you found a scientific explanation to the little girl and butterfly thingee yet?

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diOuUYcenW0

Yes.  You're using the quote feature.  I'll give you that.  The problem is that your responses do not match up with that which you are quoting.

boards of FL wrote:If someone is talking about today's NFL playoff games and then I quote them and say "Ah Ha!   I knew you support late term abortion!", that doesn't mean that I am directly responding to their post.

boards of FL wrote:So far, you have entered a conversation about the existence of god and have only managed to talk about US foreign policy.

boards of FL wrote:You're leaving us with no choice but to conclude that either 1) you're functionally illiterate and you - for whatever reason - feel this thread is about US foreign policy or 2) you understand that this is a conversation about the existence of god, but you aren't capable of communicating coherently in writing well enough to directly respond to anything.

boards of FL wrote:Further, you're throwing out phrases like "practicing Darwinist" and "practicing atheist" without even explaining what you mean by this.  If you're going to make shit up on the fly, shouldn't you at least clarify what it is?

boards of FL wrote:Last chance for Damaged.  Do you have anything to say regarding the actual subject of the thread?  Is there anything in this thread that you care to respond to, directly?  If not, we can all leave you to talk to yourself in the elevator, which would be par for the course.

boards of FL wrote:Regarding the "littler girl and butterfly thingee", my guess is that you are referring to your sentence fragment from earlier.  I can't really respond to that because it is merely a sentence fragment.  It doesn't mean anything.

boards of FL wrote:Ah fuck it.  Here. I'll respond.

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Why do little girls like butterflies need no reason?

Because do is today for reason game on in playoff 2015.

There.

Vikingwoman wrote:He can't clarify anything because he knows his responses had nothing to do w/ the subject and that is his way of attacking. He doesn't even get he sounds like some dumb shit that is on an acid trip.

Vikingwoman wrote:He can't clarify anything because he knows his responses had nothing to do w/ the subject and that is his way of attacking. He doesn't even get he sounds like some dumb shit that is on an acid trip.

Vikingwoman wrote:Good grief and I bet your allowed to vote too.

Wordslinger wrote:"God will judge America over abortion and gay marriage."

So let's get this straight . . . God didn't judge America over the millions of natives that were raped and murdered and had their land stolen.  God didn't judge America over the millions of Africans that had boulders tied to their legs and were raped, murdered and enslaved for centuries.  And God didn't judge america over not taking care of the needs of the homeless, hungry, sick and dying poor.  But now God will judge America over abortion and gay marriage.  Ok.  Got it.  

KarlRove wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:"God will judge America over abortion and gay marriage."

So let's get this straight . . . God didn't judge America over the millions of natives that were raped and murdered and had their land stolen.  God didn't judge America over the millions of Africans that had boulders tied to their legs and were raped, murdered and enslaved for centuries.  And God didn't judge america over not taking care of the needs of the homeless, hungry, sick and dying poor.  But now God will judge America over abortion and gay marriage.  Ok.  Got it.  

How do you know America wasn't judged for those acts?