Forensic Sound Bites & Half Truths

http://pathologyexpert.blogspot.com/2014_10_01_archive.html

This is the text of my actual email exchange with Post-Dispatch health and medical news reporter Blythe Bernhard:

"From: "Dr. Judy Melinek"
Date: October 21, 2014 at 5:53:21 PM PDT
To: Blythe Bernhard
Subject: Re: media request

Great talking to you. Here are the quotes:

"The autopsy report shows that there are a minimum of 6 and maximum of 8 gunshot wounds to the body. The graze wound on the right thumb is oriented upwards, indicating that the tip of the thumb is toward the weapon. The hand wound has gunpowder particles on microscopic examination, which suggests that it is a close-range wound. That means that Mr. Brown's hand would have been close to the barrel of the gun. Given the investigative report which says that the officer's weapon discharged during a struggle in the officer's car, this wound to the right thumb likely occurred at that time. The chest wounds are going front to back, indicating that Mr. Brown was facing the officer when he was shot in the torso, then collapsed or leaned forward exposing the top of his head. You can't say within reasonable certainty that his hands were up based on the autopsy findings alone. The back to front and upward trajectory of the right forearm wound could occur in multiple orientations and a trajectory reconstruction would need to be done using the witness statements, casings, height of the weapon and other evidence from the scene, which have yet to be released. The tissue fragment on the exterior of the officer's vehicle appears to be skin tissue, but only DNA analysis would confirm if it is from Mr. Brown or the officer. It is 'lightly pigmented' but even African-American skin can appear lightly pigmented on a small microscopic section, depending on what part of the body it came from."

This is how I was quoted in the Post-Dispatch the next day:

Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco, said the autopsy “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has gunpowder particulate material in the wound.” She added, “If he has his hand near the gun when it goes off, he’s going for the officer’s gun.” Sources told the Post-Dispatch that Brown’s blood had been found on Wilson’s gun. Melinek also said the autopsy did not support witnesses who have claimed Brown was shot while running away from Wilson, or with his hands up.

Notice the difference? There's a big difference between "The hand wound has gunpowder particles on microscopic examination, which suggests that it is a close-range wound. That means that Mr. Brown's hand would have been close to the barrel of the gun" and "he's going for the gun."
I was very fortunate to have the opportunity to correct this, in my own words last night, when Lawrence O’Donnell invited me to appear as a guest on MSNBC. Mr. O’Donnell allowed me to explain the autopsy findings clearly and in context—if not in full. The show is called “The Last Word,” and Lawrence O'Donnell makes sure he gets it. Despite the guest-badgering and interruptions that are a signature of his television persona, however, Mr. O’Donnell did allow me to correct the record that the St. Louis Post-Dispatch created. I am even more grateful to Tyrmaine Lee, whose companion article to last night's Last Word segment (linked above) serves as an excellent corrective to the Post-Dispatch article.

There's a significant amount of folks in this society that aren't going to listen to logic and science here regarding this case. They are liberals who want to stir up the race pot. It's funny how liberals want to throw science in front of your face with abortion and global warming/climate change, but will totally ignore it right now.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:There's a significant amount of folks in this society that aren't going to listen to logic and science here regarding this case. They are liberals who want to stir up the race pot. It's funny how liberals want to throw science in front of your face with abortion and global warming/climate change, but will totally ignore it right now.

The forensic expert is stating that her comments were taken out of context. She is stating that her findings COULD be consistent with Wilson's story, but could also be consistent with other scenarios.
Regarding your comment about race, even if you remove the fact that Brown was black and Wilson is white, the shooting, the witnesses accounts, and the handling by the PD should give everyone pause.
What is telling though, is those that complain that race is being used, question the motivation of several eye witnesses who have come forward, because you know, they're black and therefore, will obviously make statements favorable to the dead black guy. Someone even suggested that these eye witnesses rehearsed their accounts, even though they came forward immediately. What was the white worker's motivation who was video taped immediately after the shooting saying he had his "f...ing hands up"?
So you see, it's really not the liberals that want to make this about race, is it?

I watched the show. She was very frustrated that untruths were published in the Chronicle. Why would a newspaper do the same? The same reason that ISIS and Ebola were full force when ratings determine ad pricing for the biggest revenue generator for media.....elections.

The governor should have immediately appointed a special prosecutor. He is a coward and is worried about the mid terms and his election. Justice will prevail. The feds had FBI agents taking statements. A white wash can only go so far.