Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

More than 2,200 hospitals face penalties under ObamaCare rules

+2
TEOTWAWKI
Floridatexan
6 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 3]

Slicef18

Slicef18

Chrissy8 wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:obamacare is a collectivist edict... call it whatever you want... fascism even works.

Spoken like someone who knows they have reached the boundaries of the indefensible. Rather than answer the question straightforward, they use the language name calling. Such a conversation has no purpose.

I'd like to answer your question. What to do with the person who choose no insurance and got in a wreck. You tend to him. Then you garnish his wages if he cant prove he is indiginent. If he is indiginent, then his treatement dalls in the charity category.

Ill say it again, we should not mess up the 80% of people with healthcare ins now for the sake of 10-20%. Its less than that and about 10% in your area.

People want to continue to argue on this subject as if it is some moral ground and you better not say anything against it or you want people to die. This is rediculous. I want every single person to have ins, nothing would make me happier. Thats more clients and people are healthier, whats not to like?

But the methods the gov is using now is set out to punish the healthcare system and it will descrease services and care. Just like this little punishment given here in this topic.

Dont expect to get better healthcare with these tactics and punishments. these tactics may have worked on slaves, but educated people will go elsewhere and tell you to shove it sooner or later.

and what in the hell is your avatar? Suspect

Guest


Guest

Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:First off your friend needs a lawyer advocate to assist in getting medical benefits established. Yes Obamacare has some problems as a new law trying to cover a large group of people but so did Social Security and Medicare when they were implemented. Opponents say both Social Security and Medicare are going broke. They are not, they are underfunded. Congress repeatedly says they just saved X dollars on Social Security. No.......what they did was reduce it's funding. Suppose you had a car that costs $500 a month in payments. Suppose you decide to pay $450 a month in payments. Well sure enough you'd start running short in your pay off schedule.
Notice we never hear that the military is running out of money and yet it uses just as much money as Social Security. That's because it's not underfunded.

Then why have medical benefits been cut ever since the Viet Nam war ended and vets have had to pay more and more for things that were guaranteed prior to that?

Probably because that not underfunded budget you're talking about goes to building new ships, planes, tanks, bases, repair parts, barracks, housing, paychecks, etc...

I'll suggest you stay away from using the VA as a shining example of how our health care system will be.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile

You fail to understand the mindset of our military leaders. The military sees assets as necessary the win a war. Veterans are no longer a military asset, they are a liability and are a burden using assets that could be used in the prosecution of a military objective. Just look at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as an example of how military leaders value our men and women when the can no longer fulfill a military need.

And what makes you think that the government and health care companies aren't going to treat everyone else that way as they institute your grand OBAMACARE scheme?

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile

Slicef18

Slicef18

Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:First off your friend needs a lawyer advocate to assist in getting medical benefits established. Yes Obamacare has some problems as a new law trying to cover a large group of people but so did Social Security and Medicare when they were implemented. Opponents say both Social Security and Medicare are going broke. They are not, they are underfunded. Congress repeatedly says they just saved X dollars on Social Security. No.......what they did was reduce it's funding. Suppose you had a car that costs $500 a month in payments. Suppose you decide to pay $450 a month in payments. Well sure enough you'd start running short in your pay off schedule.
Notice we never hear that the military is running out of money and yet it uses just as much money as Social Security. That's because it's not underfunded.

Then why have medical benefits been cut ever since the Viet Nam war ended and vets have had to pay more and more for things that were guaranteed prior to that?

Probably because that not underfunded budget you're talking about goes to building new ships, planes, tanks, bases, repair parts, barracks, housing, paychecks, etc...

I'll suggest you stay away from using the VA as a shining example of how our health care system will be.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile

You fail to understand the mindset of our military leaders. The military sees assets as necessary the win a war. Veterans are no longer a military asset, they are a liability and are a burden using assets that could be used in the prosecution of a military objective. Just look at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as an example of how military leaders value our men and women when the can no longer fulfill a military need.

And what makes you think that the government and health care companies aren't going to treat everyone else that way as they institute your grand OBAMACARE scheme?

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile



The military VA is run by the military and the civilian hospitals are run by civilians who vote people out of office. Social Security and Medicare had the same rough start.

BTW there is no Obamacare.

Guest


Guest

Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:First off your friend needs a lawyer advocate to assist in getting medical benefits established. Yes Obamacare has some problems as a new law trying to cover a large group of people but so did Social Security and Medicare when they were implemented. Opponents say both Social Security and Medicare are going broke. They are not, they are underfunded. Congress repeatedly says they just saved X dollars on Social Security. No.......what they did was reduce it's funding. Suppose you had a car that costs $500 a month in payments. Suppose you decide to pay $450 a month in payments. Well sure enough you'd start running short in your pay off schedule.
Notice we never hear that the military is running out of money and yet it uses just as much money as Social Security. That's because it's not underfunded.

Then why have medical benefits been cut ever since the Viet Nam war ended and vets have had to pay more and more for things that were guaranteed prior to that?

Probably because that not underfunded budget you're talking about goes to building new ships, planes, tanks, bases, repair parts, barracks, housing, paychecks, etc...

I'll suggest you stay away from using the VA as a shining example of how our health care system will be.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile

You fail to understand the mindset of our military leaders. The military sees assets as necessary the win a war. Veterans are no longer a military asset, they are a liability and are a burden using assets that could be used in the prosecution of a military objective. Just look at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as an example of how military leaders value our men and women when the can no longer fulfill a military need.

And what makes you think that the government and health care companies aren't going to treat everyone else that way as they institute your grand OBAMACARE scheme?

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile



The military VA is run by the military and the civilian hospitals are run by civilians who vote people out of office. Social Security and Medicare had the same rough start.

BTW there is no Obamacare.

More than 2,200 hospitals face penalties under ObamaCare rules - Page 3 Th?id=I4788236385256237&pid=1

The VA, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc... are all government programs experiencing major difficulties at this point.

You really believe that the government is going to take it's foot out of the door of telling hospitals what they are and aren't going to do just because the civilians in those hospitals might disagree with them?

You are funny...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcZ4lnaEgm0

Laughing

The only way you're going to stop it now is for OBAMACARE to be rescinded.

Slicef18

Slicef18

Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:First off your friend needs a lawyer advocate to assist in getting medical benefits established. Yes Obamacare has some problems as a new law trying to cover a large group of people but so did Social Security and Medicare when they were implemented. Opponents say both Social Security and Medicare are going broke. They are not, they are underfunded. Congress repeatedly says they just saved X dollars on Social Security. No.......what they did was reduce it's funding. Suppose you had a car that costs $500 a month in payments. Suppose you decide to pay $450 a month in payments. Well sure enough you'd start running short in your pay off schedule.
Notice we never hear that the military is running out of money and yet it uses just as much money as Social Security. That's because it's not underfunded.

Then why have medical benefits been cut ever since the Viet Nam war ended and vets have had to pay more and more for things that were guaranteed prior to that?

Probably because that not underfunded budget you're talking about goes to building new ships, planes, tanks, bases, repair parts, barracks, housing, paychecks, etc...

I'll suggest you stay away from using the VA as a shining example of how our health care system will be.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile

You fail to understand the mindset of our military leaders. The military sees assets as necessary the win a war. Veterans are no longer a military asset, they are a liability and are a burden using assets that could be used in the prosecution of a military objective. Just look at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as an example of how military leaders value our men and women when the can no longer fulfill a military need.

And what makes you think that the government and health care companies aren't going to treat everyone else that way as they institute your grand OBAMACARE scheme?

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile



The military VA is run by the military and the civilian hospitals are run by civilians who vote people out of office. Social Security and Medicare had the same rough start.

BTW there is no Obamacare.

More than 2,200 hospitals face penalties under ObamaCare rules - Page 3 Th?id=I4788236385256237&pid=1

The VA, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc... are all government programs experiencing major difficulties at this point.

You really believe that the government is going to take it's foot out of the door of telling hospitals what they are and aren't going to do just because the civilians in those hospitals might disagree with them?

You are funny...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcZ4lnaEgm0

Laughing

The only way you're going to stop it now is for OBAMACARE to be rescinded.


"The VA, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc... are all government programs experiencing major difficulties at this point."

I get a Social Security check every month and Medicare pays my medical bills. Medicaid is a State run program. It looks like there is no government program which you approve

Guest


Guest


I get a Social Security check every month and Medicare pays my medical bills. Medicaid is a State run program. It looks like there is no government program which you approve
[/quote]

Consider your self lucky. I'm a Gen "X"r and we are told not to expect any of those things. I will work till I die or win the lotto.

Id like ot add comment about a difference into VA hospitals and non VA. I have freinds ( associates actually ) that work and some have worked in VA hospitals. Life is nice in one of those places. When we have budget cuts at our non VA hospital, VA hospitals were expanding. Our Gov doesnt know the meaning of "LEAN". Except when they want everyone else to be lean so they dont have to be. I support VA hospitals. But we wouldnt want the nations healthcare to be soley modeled after them.

Guest


Guest

From Kaiser Health News
Medicare to Penalize 2,211 Hospitals for Excess Readmissions
Jordan Rau

Other Health Care Provider Rating: ( 0 Votes ) Rate This Article:



Print This Email this
Share
Facebook Twitter
processing....


August 13, 2012 — More than 2,000 hospitals--including some nationally recognized ones--will be penalized by the government starting in October because many of their patients are readmitted soon after discharge, new records show.

Together, these hospitals will forfeit about $280 million in Medicare funds over the next year as the government begins a wide-ranging push to start paying health care providers based on the quality of care they provide.

With nearly one in five Medicare patients returning to the hospital within a month of discharge, the government considers readmissions a prime symptom of an overly expensive and uncoordinated health system. Hospitals have had little financial incentive to ensure patients get the care they need once they leave, and in fact they benefit financially when patients don’t recover and return for more treatment.

Nearly 2 million Medicare beneficiaries are readmitted within 30 days of release each year, costing Medicare $17.5 billion in additional hospital bills. The national average readmission rate has remained steady at slightly above 19 percent for several years, even as many hospitals have worked harder to lower theirs.

The penalties, authorized by the 2010 health care law, are part of a multipronged effort by Medicare to use its financial muscle to force improvements in hospital quality. In a few months, hospitals also will be penalized or rewarded based on how well they adhere to basic standards of care and how patients rated their experiences. Overall, Medicare has decided to penalize around two-thirds of the hospitals whose readmission rates it evaluated, the records show.

The penalties will fall heaviest on hospitals in New Jersey, New York, the District of Columbia, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Illinois and Massachusetts, a Kaiser Health News analysis of the records shows. Hospitals that treat the most low-income patients will be hit particularly hard.

A total of 278 hospitals nationally will lose the maximum amount allowed under the health care law: 1 percent of their base Medicare reimbursements. Several of those are top-ranked institutions, including Hackensack University Medical Center in New Jersey, North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y. and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, a teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School.

"A lot of places have put in a lot of work and not seen improvement," said Dr. Kenneth Sands, senior vice president for quality at Beth Israel. "It is not completely understood what goes into an institution having a high readmission rate and what goes into improving" it.

Sands noted that Beth Israel, like several other hospitals with high readmission rates, also has unusually low mortality rates for its patients, which he says may reflect that the hospital does a good job at swiftly getting ailing patients back and preventing deaths.

Penalties Will Increase Next Year

The maximum penalty will increase after this year, to 2 percent of regular payments starting in October 2013 and then to 3 percent the following year. This year, the $280 million in penalties comprise about 0.3 percent of the total amount hospitals are paid by Medicare.

According to Medicare records, 1,933 hospitals will receive penalties less than 1 percent; the total number of hospitals receiving penalties is 2,211. Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, which U.S. News last month ranked as the best hospital in the country, will lose 0.5 percent of its Medicare payments because of its readmission rates, the records show. The smallest penalties are one hundredth of a percent, which 50 hospitals will receive.

Dr. Eric Coleman, a national expert on readmissions at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, said the looming penalties have captured the attention of many hospital executives. "I’m not sure penalties alone are going to move the needle, but they have raised awareness and moved many hospitals to action," Coleman said.

The penalties have been intensely debated. Studies have found that African-Americans are more likely to be readmitted than other patients, leading some experts to be concerned that hospitals that treat many blacks will end up being unfairly punished.

Hospitals have been complaining that Medicare is applying the rule more stringently than Congress intended by holding them accountable for returning patients no matter the reason they come back.

Hospitals That Serve Poor Are Hit Harder Than Others

Some safety-net hospitals that treat large numbers of low-income patients tend to have higher readmission rates, which the hospitals attribute to the lack of access to doctors and medication these patients often experience after discharge. The analysis of the penalties shows that 76 percent of the hospitals that have a lot of low-income patients will lose Medicare funds in the fiscal year starting in October. Only 55 percent of the hospitals treating few poor patients are going to be penalized, the analysis shows.

"It’s our mission, it’s good, it’s what we want to do, but to be penalized because we care for those folks doesn’t seem right," said Dr. John Lynch, chief medical officer at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, which is receiving the maximum penalty.

"We have worked on this for over four years," Lynch said, but those efforts have not substantially reduced the hospital’s readmissions. He said Barnes-Jewish has tried sending nurses to patients’ homes within a week of discharge to check up on them, and also scheduled appointments with a doctor at a clinic, but half the patients never showed. This spring, the hospital established a team of nurses, social workers and a pharmacist to monitor patients for 60 days after discharge.

"Some of the hospitals that are going to pay penalties are not going to be able to afford these types of interventions," said Lynch, who estimated the penalty would cost Barnes-Jewish $1 million.

Atul Grover, chief public policy officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges, called Medicare’s new penalties "a total disregard for underserved patients and the hospitals that care for them." Blair Childs, an executive at the Premier healthcare alliance of hospitals, said: "It’s really ironic that you penalize the hospitals that need the funds to manage a particularly difficult population."

Medicare disagreed, writing that "many safety-net providers and teaching hospitals do as well or better on the measures than hospitals without substantial numbers of patients of low socioeconomic status." Safety-net hospitals that are not being penalized include the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson and Denver Health Medical Center in Colorado, the records show.

Bill Kramer, an executive with the Pacific Business Group on Health, a California-based coalition of employers, said the penalties provide "an appropriate financial incentive for hospitals to do the right thing in terms of preventing avoidable readmissions."

The government’s penalties are based on the frequency that Medicare heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia patients were readmitted within 30 days between July 2008 and June 2011. Medicare took into account the sickness of the patients when calculating whether the rates were higher than those of the average hospital, but not their racial or socio-economic background.

The penalty will be deducted from reimbursements each time a hospital submits a claim starting Oct. 1. As an example, if a hospital received the maximum penalty of 1 percent and it submitted a claim for $20,000 for a stay, Medicare would reimburse it $19,800.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has been trying to help hospitals and community organizations by giving grants to help them coordinate patients’ care after they’re discharged. Leaders at many hospitals say they are devoting increased attention to readmissions in concert with other changes created by the health law.

Sally Boemer, senior vice president of finance at Mass General, said she expected readmissions will drop as the hospital develops new methods of arranging and paying for care that emphasize prevention. Readmissions "is a big focus of ours right now," she said.

Gundersen Lutheran Health System in La Crosse, Wis., and Intermountain Medical Center in Murray, Utah, were among 1,156 hospitals where Medicare determined the readmission rates were acceptable. Those hospitals will not lose any money. On average, the readmissions penalties were lightest on hospitals in Utah, South Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming and New Mexico, the analysis shows. Idaho was the only state where Medicare did not penalize any hospital.

Even some hospitals that won’t be penalized are struggling to get a handle on readmissions. Michael Baumann, chief quality officer at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, said in-house doctors had made headway against heart failure readmissions by calling patients at home shortly after discharge. "It’s a fairly simple approach, but it’s very labor intensive," he said.

The problems afflicting many of the center’s patients—including obesity and poverty that makes it hard to afford medications—make it more challenging. "It’s a tough group to prevent readmissions with," he said.

Guest


Guest

Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:
Slicef18 wrote:First off your friend needs a lawyer advocate to assist in getting medical benefits established. Yes Obamacare has some problems as a new law trying to cover a large group of people but so did Social Security and Medicare when they were implemented. Opponents say both Social Security and Medicare are going broke. They are not, they are underfunded. Congress repeatedly says they just saved X dollars on Social Security. No.......what they did was reduce it's funding. Suppose you had a car that costs $500 a month in payments. Suppose you decide to pay $450 a month in payments. Well sure enough you'd start running short in your pay off schedule.
Notice we never hear that the military is running out of money and yet it uses just as much money as Social Security. That's because it's not underfunded.

Then why have medical benefits been cut ever since the Viet Nam war ended and vets have had to pay more and more for things that were guaranteed prior to that?

Probably because that not underfunded budget you're talking about goes to building new ships, planes, tanks, bases, repair parts, barracks, housing, paychecks, etc...

I'll suggest you stay away from using the VA as a shining example of how our health care system will be.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile

You fail to understand the mindset of our military leaders. The military sees assets as necessary the win a war. Veterans are no longer a military asset, they are a liability and are a burden using assets that could be used in the prosecution of a military objective. Just look at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as an example of how military leaders value our men and women when the can no longer fulfill a military need.

And what makes you think that the government and health care companies aren't going to treat everyone else that way as they institute your grand OBAMACARE scheme?

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQzUCO7rG0M

Smile



The military VA is run by the military and the civilian hospitals are run by civilians who vote people out of office. Social Security and Medicare had the same rough start.

BTW there is no Obamacare.

More than 2,200 hospitals face penalties under ObamaCare rules - Page 3 Th?id=I4788236385256237&pid=1

The VA, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc... are all government programs experiencing major difficulties at this point.

You really believe that the government is going to take it's foot out of the door of telling hospitals what they are and aren't going to do just because the civilians in those hospitals might disagree with them?

You are funny...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcZ4lnaEgm0

Laughing

The only way you're going to stop it now is for OBAMACARE to be rescinded.


"The VA, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc... are all government programs experiencing major difficulties at this point."

I get a Social Security check every month and Medicare pays my medical bills. Medicaid is a State run program. It looks like there is no government program which you approve

I don't expect any of them to provide me much of anything by the time I'm seventy. So you'd best enjoy yours while it lasts because as the years roll by you'll be...

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsCyC1dZiN8

Smile

Slicef18

Slicef18

[quote="Chrissy8"]From Kaiser Health News
Medicare to Penalize 2,211 Hospitals for Excess Readmissions
Jordan Rau

Other Health Care Provider Rating: ( 0 Votes ) Rate This Article:



Print This Email this
Share
Facebook Twitter
processing....


August 13, 2012 — More than 2,000 hospitals--including some nationally recognized ones--will be penalized by the government starting in October because many of their patients are readmitted soon after discharge, new records show.

Together, these hospitals will forfeit about $280 million in Medicare funds over the next year as the government begins a wide-ranging push to start paying health care providers based on the quality of care they provide.

With nearly one in five Medicare patients returning to the hospital within a month of discharge, the government considers readmissions a prime symptom of an overly expensive and uncoordinated health system. Hospitals have had little financial incentive to ensure patients get the care they need once they leave, and in fact they benefit financially when patients don’t recover and return for more treatment.

Nearly 2 million Medicare beneficiaries are readmitted within 30 days of release each year, costing Medicare $17.5 billion in additional hospital bills. The national average readmission rate has remained steady at slightly above 19 percent for several years, even as many hospitals have worked harder to lower theirs.

The penalties, authorized by the 2010 health care law, are part of a multipronged effort by Medicare to use its financial muscle to force improvements in hospital quality. In a few months, hospitals also will be penalized or rewarded based on how well they adhere to basic standards of care and how patients rated their experiences. Overall, Medicare has decided to penalize around two-thirds of the hospitals whose readmission rates it evaluated, the records show.

The penalties will fall heaviest on hospitals in New Jersey, New York, the District of Columbia, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Illinois and Massachusetts, a Kaiser Health News analysis of the records shows. Hospitals that treat the most low-income patients will be hit particularly hard.

A total of 278 hospitals nationally will lose the maximum amount allowed under the health care law: 1 percent of their base Medicare reimbursements. Several of those are top-ranked institutions, including Hackensack University Medical Center in New Jersey, North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y. and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, a teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School.

"A lot of places have put in a lot of work and not seen improvement," said Dr. Kenneth Sands, senior vice president for quality at Beth Israel. "It is not completely understood what goes into an institution having a high readmission rate and what goes into improving" it.

Sands noted that Beth Israel, like several other hospitals with high readmission rates, also has unusually low mortality rates for its patients, which he says may reflect that the hospital does a good job at swiftly getting ailing patients back and preventing deaths.

Penalties Will Increase Next Year

The maximum penalty will increase after this year, to 2 percent of regular payments starting in October 2013 and then to 3 percent the following year. This year, the $280 million in penalties comprise about 0.3 percent of the total amount hospitals are paid by Medicare.

According to Medicare records, 1,933 hospitals will receive penalties less than 1 percent; the total number of hospitals receiving penalties is 2,211. Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, which U.S. News last month ranked as the best hospital in the country, will lose 0.5 percent of its Medicare payments because of its readmission rates, the records show. The smallest penalties are one hundredth of a percent, which 50 hospitals will receive.

Dr. Eric Coleman, a national expert on readmissions at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, said the looming penalties have captured the attention of many hospital executives. "I’m not sure penalties alone are going to move the needle, but they have raised awareness and moved many hospitals to action," Coleman said.

The penalties have been intensely debated. Studies have found that African-Americans are more likely to be readmitted than other patients, leading some experts to be concerned that hospitals that treat many blacks will end up being unfairly punished.

Hospitals have been complaining that Medicare is applying the rule more stringently than Congress intended by holding them accountable for returning patients no matter the reason they come back.

Hospitals That Serve Poor Are Hit Harder Than Others

Some safety-net hospitals that treat large numbers of low-income patients tend to have higher readmission rates, which the hospitals attribute to the lack of access to doctors and medication these patients often experience after discharge. The analysis of the penalties shows that 76 percent of the hospitals that have a lot of low-income patients will lose Medicare funds in the fiscal year starting in October. Only 55 percent of the hospitals treating few poor patients are going to be penalized, the analysis shows.

"It’s our mission, it’s good, it’s what we want to do, but to be penalized because we care for those folks doesn’t seem right," said Dr. John Lynch, chief medical officer at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, which is receiving the maximum penalty.

"We have worked on this for over four years," Lynch said, but those efforts have not substantially reduced the hospital’s readmissions. He said Barnes-Jewish has tried sending nurses to patients’ homes within a week of discharge to check up on them, and also scheduled appointments with a doctor at a clinic, but half the patients never showed. This spring, the hospital established a team of nurses, social workers and a pharmacist to monitor patients for 60 days after discharge.

"Some of the hospitals that are going to pay penalties are not going to be able to afford these types of interventions," said Lynch, who estimated the penalty would cost Barnes-Jewish $1 million.

Atul Grover, chief public policy officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges, called Medicare’s new penalties "a total disregard for underserved patients and the hospitals that care for them." Blair Childs, an executive at the Premier healthcare alliance of hospitals, said: "It’s really ironic that you penalize the hospitals that need the funds to manage a particularly difficult population."

Medicare disagreed, writing that "many safety-net providers and teaching hospitals do as well or better on the measures than hospitals without substantial numbers of patients of low socioeconomic status." Safety-net hospitals that are not being penalized include the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson and Denver Health Medical Center in Colorado, the records show.

Bill Kramer, an executive with the Pacific Business Group on Health, a California-based coalition of employers, said the penalties provide "an appropriate financial incentive for hospitals to do the right thing in terms of preventing avoidable readmissions."

The government’s penalties are based on the frequency that Medicare heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia patients were readmitted within 30 days between July 2008 and June 2011. Medicare took into account the sickness of the patients when calculating whether the rates were higher than those of the average hospital, but not their racial or socio-economic background.

The penalty will be deducted from reimbursements each time a hospital submits a claim starting Oct. 1. As an example, if a hospital received the maximum penalty of 1 percent and it submitted a claim for $20,000 for a stay, Medicare would reimburse it $19,800.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has been trying to help hospitals and community organizations by giving grants to help them coordinate patients’ care after they’re discharged. Leaders at many hospitals say they are devoting increased attention to readmissions in concert with other changes created by the health law.

Sally Boemer, senior vice president of finance at Mass General, said she expected readmissions will drop as the hospital develops new methods of arranging and paying for care that emphasize prevention. Readmissions "is a big focus of ours right now," she said.

Gundersen Lutheran Health System in La Crosse, Wis., and Intermountain Medical Center in Murray, Utah, were among 1,156 hospitals where Medicare determined the readmission rates were acceptable. Those hospitals will not lose any money. On average, the readmissions penalties were lightest on hospitals in Utah, South Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming and New Mexico, the analysis shows. Idaho was the only state where Medicare did not penalize any hospital.

Even some hospitals that won’t be penalized are struggling to get a handle on readmissions. Michael Baumann, chief quality officer at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, said in-house doctors had made headway against heart failure readmissions by calling patients at home shortly after discharge. "It’s a fairly simple approach, but it’s very labor intensive," he said.

The problems afflicting many of the center’s patients—including obesity and poverty that makes it hard to afford medications—make it more challenging. "It’s a tough group to prevent readmissions with," he said.

[/quote

Thank You for one of the most informative pieces on the subject that I've seen. Very well done.

Guest


Guest

Youre welcome Slice.

I am a member of all these healthcare organizations and they send me updates. This is one I got when I went into work today,thought Id add it.

Thank you for the good conversation. Smile

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 3]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum