Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Obama's disdain for the CONSTITUTION

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/11/19/obamas-disdain-for-the-constitution-means-we-risk-losing-our-republic/



Last edited by PACEDOG#1 on 12/2/2013, 12:31 am; edited 1 time in total

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

The thread title reads:  "Obama's disdain for the Cobstitution"

WTF is a "cobstitution?"
Razz

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

PeeDog..... In such a hurry to set up another thread Hatin' Obama that he didn't proof read his own typing....LOL! Embarassed 

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

It's iPhone auto spell but you retards , but none of you would know anything about those since you are still using flip phones lol

.... No substance to your posts either guess the article was above your reading levels

Guest


Guest

Yep, no comments on the article...as usual when your Wheaties get peed in

2seaoat



Pace,
If the conclusion of the article is correct, a simple lawsuit will bring any constitutional questions before the Supreme Court. The truth is that it would take at least a year for those suits to get to the Supreme Court, and I would bet doughnut to dollars all constitutional questions will be moot.

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The thread title reads:  "Obama's disdain for the Cobstitution"

WTF is a "cobstitution?"
Razz
That all you ever have isn't it?  However, it does continue to make you look petty and foolish.

Keep up the good work!

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:PeeDog..... In such a hurry to set up another thread Hatin' Obama that he didn't proof read his own typing....LOL! Embarassed 
That all you ever have isn't it?  However, it does continue to make you look petty and foolish.
 
Keep up the good work!

Good to see though that you agree with the principal of everything posted.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The thread title reads:  "Obama's disdain for the Cobstitution"

WTF is a "cobstitution?"
Razz
That all you ever have isn't it?  However, it does continue to make you look petty and foolish.

Keep up the good work!
You look petty and foolish every day on this forum. Your daily fulminations are, well, amusing and predictable.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

When are you going to address the thread topic or are you at a loss for words concern the issue? Gonna give Obama a free pass and I am sure blame Bush all at the same time?

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The thread title reads:  "Obama's disdain for the Cobstitution"

WTF is a "cobstitution?"
Razz
That all you ever have isn't it?  However, it does continue to make you look petty and foolish.

Keep up the good work!
You look petty and foolish every day on this forum. Your daily fulminations are, well, amusing and predictable.
no, he's boring and ACCURATE, youre just boring.

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:PeeDog..... In such a hurry to set up another thread Hatin' Obama that he didn't proof read his own typing....LOL! Embarassed 
Obama's disdain for the CONSTITUTION 9k=

And you were in such a hurry to post a reply that you had to make two when one would have sufficed. Bet you peed your pants just doing it.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5820lRHMwjw

Laughing 

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The thread title reads:  "Obama's disdain for the Cobstitution"

WTF is a "cobstitution?"
Razz
That all you ever have isn't it?  However, it does continue to make you look petty and foolish.

Keep up the good work!
You look petty and foolish every day on this forum. Your daily fulminations are, well, amusing and predictable.
Obama's disdain for the CONSTITUTION Laughinganimationdog

14Obama's disdain for the CONSTITUTION Empty Thank you. 12/4/2013, 9:22 pm

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Pace,
If the conclusion of the article is correct, a simple lawsuit will bring any constitutional questions before the Supreme Court.  The truth is that it would take at least a year for those suits to get to the Supreme Court, and I would bet doughnut to dollars all constitutional questions will be moot.
Good post, seaoat.  Except that kind of rational thinking is not the way pee-dog/KarlRove works.  
Let us talk about the author of the article who is an economist, not a lawyer.
M. Northrup Buechner is an economist who worships Ayn Rand.  
Any idea why Buechner would hate Obama?? Anybody??
Any idea why an article about constitutional law written by an economist would hold any sway in any argument about law?
Is is still comical after all this time how pee-dog/KarlRove cites such subjective articles and considers them objective.
Got Objectivity??  I did not think so.

Go ahead, pee-dog/KarlRove, cite another subjective article to booster the argument that you are a racist, bigoted liar.
I cannot wait.....
Thanks.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum