Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Chemo's face....

+8
Floridatexan
Hospital Bob
Nekochan
boards of FL
Markle
Sal
2seaoat
TEOTWAWKI
12 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Go down  Message [Page 5 of 5]

101Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 10:32 pm

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Chrissy wrote:
2seaoat wrote:Mentioning someone had cancer when you told everyone you did and Teo posting pictures of a woman dying of cancer is the same thing? How effed up are you?


The offensive nature of a post of child porno, or an nazi apologist utilizes time tested propaganda technique.   I have discussed the propaganda technique of association.   T shows a woman who is slowly being consumed by cancer and implies that this horror is a result of modern science and intellectual attempts to address disease.   He show buildings toppling and then suggests jews are behind the conspiracy.   He shows our military as mere pawns in a great jewish conspiracy, and he finally shows the federal reserve as a jewish invention controlled by a multi generational jewish conspiracy.  This blood and soil purity of diet without the phillistine whipped cream is as old of a tell for a Nazi as the day is long.    Now Bob if you think my calling BP a sick puppy is any less correct than Mr. Markle correctly calling T a sick puppy, you are wrong.   I find his thread as obscene as if he was posting nude children engaging in sex acts.   If it was isolated and not connected, I would certainly be full of chit and digging a hole, and most certainly would owe somebody an apology.   I am dead cinch correct.   It waddles like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, and you can describe it any way you want, or try to convince me I am not dealing with a duck.......sorry I have been calling this duck out for five years.
its YOU who is sick to continue PUKING this shit out onto the forum to have to disgustingly read.

You are SICK in the head.
Don't read it ,neurotic fattie. Nobody twisting your drunken arm.
shove a LONG HOT FIRE POKER up your ASS... and smile while you enjoy it.

102Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 10:37 pm

2seaoat



shove a LONG HOT FIRE POKER up your ASS... and smile while you enjoy it.




Nope.....nobody sick around here.......mental health is a stellar pillar of this forum.

103Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 10:38 pm

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:shove a LONG HOT FIRE POKER up your ASS... and smile while you enjoy it.




Nope.....nobody sick around here.......mental health is a stellar pillar of this forum.
Youre just jealous You don't have a long hot fire poker to shove up your ass. LOL

but im sure you prefer to suck your fire pokers.... go suck one so your mouth will be full for a few...

104Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 10:44 pm

Guest


Guest

Mr Oats. I find your world to be very interesting that you can conclude some one is a "Dimwit" for meeting or having inter action another person.

105Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 10:53 pm

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

http://chrisbeatcancer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/contribution-of-chemotherapy-to-5-year-survival.pdf

Overview
The Contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
to 5-year Survival in Adult Malignancies
Graeme Morgan*,
Robyn Wardy
, Michael Barton

*Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore
Hospital, Sydney, NSW;

Department of Medical Oncology,
St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW;

Collaboration for Cancer
Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Liverpool Health Service, Sydney, NSW, Australia
ABSTRACT:
Aims:
The debate on the funding and availability of cytotoxic drugs raises questions about the contribution of curative or adjuvant
cytotoxic chemotherapy to survival in adult cancer patients.
Materials and methods:
We undertook a literature search for randomised clinical trials reporting a 5-year survival benefit attributable
solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy in adult malignancies. The total number of newly diagnosed cancer patients for 22 major adult
malignancies was determined from cancer registry data in Australia and from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data in the
USA for 1998. For each malignancy, the absolute number to benefit was the product of (a) the total number of persons with that
malignancy; (b) the proportion or subgroup(s) of that malignancy showing a benefit; and (c) the percentage increase in 5-year survival due
solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The overall contribution was the sum total of the absolute numbers showing a 5-year survival benefit
expressed as a percentage of the total number for the 22 malignancies.
Results:
The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in
Australia and 2.1% in the USA.
Conclusion:
As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival.
To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy,
a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required. Morgan, G.
et al
. (2004).
Clinical Oncology
16,
549
e
560
2004 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Key words:
Chemotherapy, combined modality treatment, palliation, quality of life, radiotherapy, survival
Received: 18 August 2003 Revised: 20 April 2004 Accepted: 3 June 2004

106Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 11:02 pm

Guest


Guest

Chrissy wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Chrissy wrote:
2seaoat wrote:Mentioning someone had cancer when you told everyone you did and Teo posting pictures of a woman dying of cancer is the same thing? How effed up are you?


The offensive nature of a post of child porno, or an nazi apologist utilizes time tested propaganda technique.   I have discussed the propaganda technique of association.   T shows a woman who is slowly being consumed by cancer and implies that this horror is a result of modern science and intellectual attempts to address disease.   He show buildings toppling and then suggests jews are behind the conspiracy.   He shows our military as mere pawns in a great jewish conspiracy, and he finally shows the federal reserve as a jewish invention controlled by a multi generational jewish conspiracy.  This blood and soil purity of diet without the phillistine whipped cream is as old of a tell for a Nazi as the day is long.    Now Bob if you think my calling BP a sick puppy is any less correct than Mr. Markle correctly calling T a sick puppy, you are wrong.   I find his thread as obscene as if he was posting nude children engaging in sex acts.   If it was isolated and not connected, I would certainly be full of chit and digging a hole, and most certainly would owe somebody an apology.   I am dead cinch correct.   It waddles like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, and you can describe it any way you want, or try to convince me I am not dealing with a duck.......sorry I have been calling this duck out for five years.
its YOU who is sick to continue PUKING this shit out onto the forum to have to disgustingly read.

You are SICK in the head.
Don't read it ,neurotic fattie. Nobody twisting your drunken arm.
shove a LONG HOT FIRE POKER up your ASS... and smile while you enjoy it.
LOL! Hit a little too close to home,eh?

107Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 11:07 pm

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Chrissy wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Chrissy wrote:
2seaoat wrote:Mentioning someone had cancer when you told everyone you did and Teo posting pictures of a woman dying of cancer is the same thing? How effed up are you?


The offensive nature of a post of child porno, or an nazi apologist utilizes time tested propaganda technique.   I have discussed the propaganda technique of association.   T shows a woman who is slowly being consumed by cancer and implies that this horror is a result of modern science and intellectual attempts to address disease.   He show buildings toppling and then suggests jews are behind the conspiracy.   He shows our military as mere pawns in a great jewish conspiracy, and he finally shows the federal reserve as a jewish invention controlled by a multi generational jewish conspiracy.  This blood and soil purity of diet without the phillistine whipped cream is as old of a tell for a Nazi as the day is long.    Now Bob if you think my calling BP a sick puppy is any less correct than Mr. Markle correctly calling T a sick puppy, you are wrong.   I find his thread as obscene as if he was posting nude children engaging in sex acts.   If it was isolated and not connected, I would certainly be full of chit and digging a hole, and most certainly would owe somebody an apology.   I am dead cinch correct.   It waddles like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, and you can describe it any way you want, or try to convince me I am not dealing with a duck.......sorry I have been calling this duck out for five years.
its YOU who is sick to continue PUKING this shit out onto the forum to have to disgustingly read.

You are SICK in the head.
Don't read it ,neurotic fattie. Nobody twisting your drunken arm.
shove a LONG HOT FIRE POKER up your ASS... and smile while you enjoy it.
LOL! Hit a little too close to home,eh?
I knew you would love that. You love it when I shove hot things inside you.

you naughty little whore.. Twisted Evil 

108Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/25/2013, 11:42 pm

2seaoat



Mr Oats. I find your world to be very interesting that you can conclude some one is a "Dimwit" for meeting or having inter action another person.


How has that worked out for you where folks attack personal information you have shared and know who you are. You made the risk benefit analysis and more than once you have left this forum because of folks crossing the line and tying real world personal stuff with your ghost. A person who complains about the same is either a dimwit, or has not actively participated in the exchange of personal information. If you were a victim, I apologize, but if you willingly shared that information which was later used in an inappropriate way......do you think that might have been a predictable consequence of your free choice, and was that free choice one which was unconcerned with the consequences........then dimwit certainly applies.

109Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/26/2013, 12:00 am

Guest


Guest

No one has attacked me from information I have shared.   TB sent me what I considered a threatening email but the info was not correct.  The information that he gathered was from the internet and not from any disclose  of mine. I left the forum because the threat had ties to another organization that I belong to.  That has been the only issue I have ever had.  It is not hard to figure out who I am.
Other than TB, could you refresh my memory on who has attacked me with information I have personal disclosed?
You are at times, a big bully who resorts to name calling because of your lack of substance.  But you do not bother me.  Just another "Ghost" as you say, Babbling in the ether of the internet.  

110Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/26/2013, 1:24 am

Guest


Guest

GBB has repeatedly attacked you about your late wife, sadly.

111Chemo's face.... - Page 5 Empty Re: Chemo's face.... 10/26/2013, 8:32 am

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:GBB has repeatedly attacked you about your late wife, sadly.
Yes and I admit He got to me on that one. But that is easy to find out, I never gave him any personal,ie Name, phone number etc, info about my self. But if he or any of his people ever wanted more information on the Gastric By Pass procedure, I would be glad to meet with them and share what I know. GBB is not all bad. He enjoys his role here on the forum. He plays it very well.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 5 of 5]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum