Sal has a good point regarding 'getting drawn in' which I have always believed has been Americas' Achilles heel as our proven penchant for sending in troops and unleashing our military before it is clear where we are headed. OBL clearly was successful in drawing America into Afghanistan, like Russia was and it has cost trillions and much blood. PD has a point, if I understand him sitting aside his loathing of the President, in that the perception of strength and the willingness to utilize it is a real factor when dealing with the evil tyrants of the world. Conversely, and to President Obama's credit, what is perceived as 'leading from behind blah-blah-blah routine hyperbole, could be interpreted in the absolute opposite view as 'America will not engage itself into every international crisis willy nilly. There's so much that we do not know and these situations, i.e., Syria, Egypt, Israel . . .on and on, that citizens are able to interpret leadership skills or our nation when, in truth, we don't know shit because of the complexities of this tinder box region. I greatly appreciate Obama's reluctance to getting drawn in on yet another conflict but that said, he has proven he will act when push comes to shove. Again, to PD, your comments about drawing 'red lines' have merit but your position in reality does not translate into an actionable way forward that is in our interests but does translate into political criticism without a credible alternative much like the current campaign to 'defund the ACA'. International policy making is not a contest of chest thumping or whose testosterone levels are highest. People die and come home in flag draped caskets and we will not have accomplished much to justify those losses.