newswatcher wrote:
Laughable....So basically the cowh is too big to fail or face justice?...
Face justice?
Precisely, of what crime do you accuse the President of the United States?
Go to page : 1, 2
newswatcher wrote:
Laughable....So basically the cowh is too big to fail or face justice?...
Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Laughable....So basically the cowh is too big to fail or face justice?...
Face justice?
Precisely, of what crime do you accuse the President of the United States?
newswatcher wrote:Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Laughable....So basically the cowh is too big to fail or face justice?...
Face justice?
Precisely, of what crime do you accuse the President of the United States?
Justice in the sense of facing criticism/questions of the cover-up....The justice in having to face the American People with a better explanation other that Benghazi is a "sideshow"....Now the IRS situation....reports are that this has been going on since 2010....A Romney contributor was villified and faced two IRS audits...certainly an abuse of authority...No wonder the cowh sheds a tear in his press conference....He and his administration are responsible for the Benghazi situation...they created the mess and probably never dreamed anyone would challange...
newswatcher wrote:Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Laughable....So basically the cowh is too big to fail or face justice?...
Face justice?
Precisely, of what crime do you accuse the President of the United States?
Justice in the sense of facing criticism/questions of the cover-up....The justice in having to face the American People with a better explanation other that Benghazi is a "sideshow"....Now the IRS situation....reports are that this has been going on since 2010....A Romney contributor was villified and faced two IRS audits...certainly an abuse of authority...No wonder the cowh sheds a tear in his press conference....He and his administration are responsible for the Benghazi situation...they created the mess and probably never dreamed anyone would challange...
*Sage* wrote:true failure is when you give up,
no one is giving up, we are all just beginning
Dreamsglore wrote:*Sage* wrote:true failure is when you give up,
no one is giving up, we are all just beginning
That's why you keep on losing the elections. You're just too dumb to get it. I expect that from you because you never learn from your mistakes. You just keep on doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. And what do they call that? LOL!
2seaoat wrote:Do you get paid extra to repeat the same lie time after time? Not even the administration, or poor Jay Carney has tried to push that phony position.
I watched all of the Sunday TV shows live. I listened to the President. Never once did I think we were attacked by anyone but terrorist. What phony position are you talking about? That I have a brain between my ears and at the end of that Sunday I believed we had been attacked by terrorists.....just like all the other embassy attacks. Now tell me.......were you confused after that Sunday? Did you change your vote for president?
The central thesis of this controversy is Americans are stupid.........it fails at every level.
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Here is a recent Tweet from Bush's former press secretary, Ari Fleischer:
"...Advice to GOP on Benghazi/IRS. Investigate facts--don't leap to conclusions (crime, impeachment). Let facts drive-not emotion....”
PkrBum wrote:There would be no issue to benghazi if the information had been limited pending investigation... then an honest explanation and appropriate remedies. It was still naive at best and incompetent at worst to cut security... even if they want to blame the right.
Nuland made the course they took very clear.
PkrBum wrote:There would be no issue to benghazi if the information had been limited pending investigation...
Sal wrote:PkrBum wrote:There would be no issue to benghazi if the information had been limited pending investigation...
Pffft ...
... the wingnuts were politicizing this before the bodies were cold.
Sal wrote:PkrBum wrote:There would be no issue to benghazi if the information had been limited pending investigation...
Pffft ...
... the wingnuts were politicizing this before the bodies were cold.
VectorMan wrote:Sal wrote:PkrBum wrote:There would be no issue to benghazi if the information had been limited pending investigation...
Pffft ...
... the wingnuts were politicizing this before the bodies were cold.
I think the left-wing-nuts got to this first. After all, this is Obama's watch. His gang had first dibs on the details. Now the wingnuts just want to know the truth. If that's even possible with this administration.
PkrBum wrote:How's this for politicization 9/12 DNC "Ask Osama bin Laden if he is better off now than he was four years ago,"
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum