Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Benghazi could bring down admin

5 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Guest


Guest

http://freebeacon.com/graham-i-think-the-dam-is-about-to-break-on-benghazi/

Guest


Guest

buckle up. we cant get rid of this admin.

its like a bad case of worms with nothing to kill it but dirt.

Best to try and survive it so we can fight again another day.

that day will come, and a lot of work will need to be done. so hold on

Guest


Guest

Benghazi isn't going to bring down anything. It didn't work as an election issue, did it? You're beating the deadest of dead horses.
That was 8 months ago. Americans moved on a long time ago. If the Republican party can't move on the rest of the country will leave them in the dust.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

-1 for PaceDog.

You already started a thread with this article. So, you decide to spam the forum up and post it twice. Why don't you log in as your sock, Karl Rove, and post it three times?

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

Eff off hater. Your entire hero KKLAN is going down.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

bluemoon wrote:Benghazi isn't going to bring down anything. It didn't work as an election issue, did it? You're beating the deadest of dead horses.
That was 8 months ago. Americans moved on a long time ago. If the Republican party can't move on the rest of the country will leave them in the dust.

PaceDog is chokin' his chicken over this issue, as all of the other wingnuts are, too.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

bluemoon wrote:Benghazi isn't going to bring down anything. It didn't work as an election issue, did it? You're beating the deadest of dead horses.
That was 8 months ago. Americans moved on a long time ago. If the Republican party can't move on the rest of the country will leave them in the dust.

Yep, Col Lindsey Graham, USAFR (also a wingnut senator from South Carolina) thinks the 'dam is about to break' over Benghazi.

The article is from the Washington Free Beacon--an online blog--that has been publishing since February of 2012.

I think you about said it right, BlueMoon.....

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Eff off hater. Your entire hero KKLAN is going down.

.....................................

What does that even mean...?

It reads like words spewing from the screaming face of a victim of mob violence.


Eff off hater. Your entire hero KKLAN is going down.



Oh, the humanity....!!!!

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Billy the Kid wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Eff off hater. Your entire hero KKLAN is going down.

.....................................

What does that even mean...?

It reads like words spewing from the screaming face of a victim of mob violence.


Eff off hater. Your entire hero KKLAN is going down.

Oh, the humanity....!!!!

That is coming from the biggest hater on this forum, too....

According to PaceDog's article Col (USAFR)/Senator Graham said Benghazi is: "...every bit as damaging as Watergate..." I don't think that wingnut studied the Watergate affair before he opened his flap-trap and made his comparison.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

bluemoon wrote:Benghazi isn't going to bring down anything. It didn't work as an election issue, did it? You're beating the deadest of dead horses.
That was 8 months ago. Americans moved on a long time ago. If the Republican party can't move on the rest of the country will leave them in the dust.

Neither did Watergate. It was the cover up.

Finally the major networks are being forced to carry the story.

Guest


Guest

bluemoon wrote:Benghazi isn't going to bring down anything. It didn't work as an election issue, did it? You're beating the deadest of dead horses.
That was 8 months ago. Americans moved on a long time ago. If the Republican party can't move on the rest of the country will leave them in the dust.

Guest


Guest

bluemoon wrote:Benghazi isn't going to bring down anything. It didn't work as an election issue, did it? You're beating the deadest of dead horses.
That was 8 months ago. Americans moved on a long time ago. If the Republican party can't move on the rest of the country will leave them in the dust.

No......Americans haven't moved on....the apologists and excuse makers for this administration have moved on....Better check your facts because democrats are being critical and distancing themselves from this lack of leadership...Even the lamestream media has finally HAD to cover this story that they've neglected for months...Not predicting a bringing down of the administration but the coverup and lies will be exposed and as you mentioned perhaps this was done for political reason around the election...

Sal

Sal

newswatcher wrote:as you mentioned perhaps this was done for political reason around the election...

Please expound upon this ...

... specifically, please ...

... a coverup of what ...

... by whom ...

... to what end?


Very Happy

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:as you mentioned perhaps this was done for political reason around the election...

Please expound upon this ...

... specifically, please ...

... a coverup of what ...

... by whom ...

... to what end?


Very Happy

Hopefully all those questions will be answered and there will be names like HRC...Rice...to fill them in....Of course it was a cover-up...first is was the internet video responsible....then a spontaneous demonstration and the reluctance to even call this what it was...a terrorist attack...There were early warning signs of trouble and e-mails from Embassy Officials requesting help that were denied...Officials have stated FROM THE BEGINNING they sent information that the Embassy was UNDER ATTACK not simply a protest....Now officials (pentagon) have stated a response may have handled the situation but doing nothing resulted in the murders of four...This is also the opinion of the #2 official at the Embassy....You've asked the important question....'by whom'...Can't explain why then Amb Rice went on the news show circuit and continued blaming the video and protests when the fact was known at the time it was a terrorist attack...Was it a reward for her to then be considered to be nominated for the job of Secretary of State?...'To what end'...why wasn't this entire situation dealt with when the opportunity presented itself?...Just how high up the chain of command did the order come not to send forces to assist?...It appears (IMO) that this administration made a tragic blunder and their arrogance guided them to tell stories that they knew were false and had no problem in doing so because they knew their supporters (media) would follow once again blindly...The administration was at fault but another HUGE disgrace is the total lack of journalistic integrity in this and other matters involving this administration...Lastly....cannot stand what this administration has done and is doing to this country....BUT....Hate that when something like Benghazi happens and the terrorists murder American Officials....WE as a nation are made to look weak and that should be unacceptable to ALL....

Sal

Sal

newswatcher wrote:

Hopefully all those questions will be answered and there will be names like HRC...Rice...to fill them in....Of course it was a cover-up...first is was the internet video responsible....then a spontaneous demonstration and the reluctance to even call this what it was...a terrorist attack...There were early warning signs of trouble and e-mails from Embassy Officials requesting help that were denied...Officials have stated FROM THE BEGINNING they sent information that the Embassy was UNDER ATTACK not simply a protest....Now officials (pentagon) have stated a response may have handled the situation but doing nothing resulted in the murders of four...This is also the opinion of the #2 official at the Embassy....You've asked the important question....'by whom'...Can't explain why then Amb Rice went on the news show circuit and continued blaming the video and protests when the fact was known at the time it was a terrorist attack...Was it a reward for her to then be considered to be nominated for the job of Secretary of State?...'To what end'...why wasn't this entire situation dealt with when the opportunity presented itself?...Just how high up the chain of command did the order come not to send forces to assist?...It appears (IMO) that this administration made a tragic blunder and their arrogance guided them to tell stories that they knew were false and had no problem in doing so because they knew their supporters (media) would follow once again blindly...The administration was at fault but another HUGE disgrace is the total lack of journalistic integrity in this and other matters involving this administration...Lastly....cannot stand what this administration has done and is doing to this country....BUT....Hate that when something like Benghazi happens and the terrorists murder American Officials....WE as a nation are made to look weak and that should be unacceptable to ALL....

Jeezus ...

... what a conspiracy theory potpourri of ignorance, bullshit, and propaganda.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:as you mentioned perhaps this was done for political reason around the election...

Please expound upon this ...

... specifically, please ...

... a coverup of what ...

... by whom ...

... to what end?


Very Happy

You know what there covering up.. your just not sayin because your in on it.. Very Happy

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:

Hopefully all those questions will be answered and there will be names like HRC...Rice...to fill them in....Of course it was a cover-up...first is was the internet video responsible....then a spontaneous demonstration and the reluctance to even call this what it was...a terrorist attack...There were early warning signs of trouble and e-mails from Embassy Officials requesting help that were denied...Officials have stated FROM THE BEGINNING they sent information that the Embassy was UNDER ATTACK not simply a protest....Now officials (pentagon) have stated a response may have handled the situation but doing nothing resulted in the murders of four...This is also the opinion of the #2 official at the Embassy....You've asked the important question....'by whom'...Can't explain why then Amb Rice went on the news show circuit and continued blaming the video and protests when the fact was known at the time it was a terrorist attack...Was it a reward for her to then be considered to be nominated for the job of Secretary of State?...'To what end'...why wasn't this entire situation dealt with when the opportunity presented itself?...Just how high up the chain of command did the order come not to send forces to assist?...It appears (IMO) that this administration made a tragic blunder and their arrogance guided them to tell stories that they knew were false and had no problem in doing so because they knew their supporters (media) would follow once again blindly...The administration was at fault but another HUGE disgrace is the total lack of journalistic integrity in this and other matters involving this administration...Lastly....cannot stand what this administration has done and is doing to this country....BUT....Hate that when something like Benghazi happens and the terrorists murder American Officials....WE as a nation are made to look weak and that should be unacceptable to ALL....

Jeezus ...

... what a conspiracy theory potpourri of ignorance, bullshit, and propaganda.

The facts are there and the incompetence has been on display...and yes 'ignorance'....'bull____' and 'propaganda' are all words to describe the lack of leadership of this administration....No conspiracy here...Would have much rather seen the cowh/administration once again 'spike the football' and take another victory lap if it would have defended the Embassy and possibly saving the staff...

VectorMan

VectorMan

If there was a republican president and sec. of state in office on 9-11-12 you liberals, along with your liberal media, would be foaming at the mouth for investigations, charges, impeachment and God only knows what else. But, since it's democrats with socialist agendas it's all good. No pound of flesh needed. Go along with MSNBC and "lean forward" comrades.

Sal

Sal

VectorMan wrote:If there was a republican president and sec. of state in office on 9-11-12 you liberals, along with your liberal media, would be foaming at the mouth for investigations, charges, impeachment and God only knows what else.

Really?

Because over 50 people were killed in attacks on our embassies and consulates on Dubya's watch.

How many calls for investigations, charges, and impeachments do you remember in response?

HINT: The answer is zip, zero, nada.

You know why?

Because we liberals aren't unpatriotic assholes willing to wade through the blood of patriots to make a political attack, unlike you asshole.

VectorMan

VectorMan

Sal wrote:
VectorMan wrote:If there was a republican president and sec. of state in office on 9-11-12 you liberals, along with your liberal media, would be foaming at the mouth for investigations, charges, impeachment and God only knows what else.

Really?

Because over 50 people were killed in attacks on our embassies and consulates on Dubya's watch.

How many calls for investigations, charges, and impeachments do you remember in response?

HINT: The answer is zip, zero, nada.

You know why?

Because we liberals aren't unpatriotic assholes willing to wade through the blood of patriots to make a political attack, unlike you asshole.

Such a nasty little man. It's pretty funny that you, of all people, have the nerve to call someome else an asshole. LOL

If there were any lies, cover-ups, whistle blowers or mad mothers of those 50+ dead people, you libtards would have had yourselves a hay day. So I guess there was no need for investigations, charges or impeachment. Because if it were even a remote possibility you liberals would have been all over it. You know it, I know it and so does everyone else with a working brain. Just because you don't except or believe it doesn't make it untrue.

But, you carry on you outstanding American patriot. You must be very proud.
Razz

Guest


Guest

[quote="VectorMan"]
Sal wrote:
VectorMan wrote:If t



If there were any lies, cover-ups, whistle blowers or mad mothers of those 50+ dead people, you libtards would have had yourselves a hay day. So I guess there was no need for investigations, charges or impeachment. .
Razz

Exactly.....

Sal

Sal

VectorMan wrote:

If there were any lies, cover-ups, whistle blowers or mad mothers of those 50+ dead people, you libtards would have had yourselves a hay day. So I guess there was no need for investigations, charges or impeachment.

You've got it backward, asshole.

If liberals had chosen to immediately politicize the attacks that occurred on Dubya's watch, there would indeed have been charges of lies and coverups, opportunistic whistle blowers, and angry mothers.

That's how these things metastasize.

Guest


Guest

Benghazi could bring down admin 217159_4799623316694_443008571_n_zpsa815ab43

Guest


Guest

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL LMAO@ Lurch

lurch thinks hes got something with that bush thing. because bush went on national tv and told a lie to the country about the deaths being over a old utube video, even spent tax payer money telling the other country on their tv channels it was over a utube video....

LOLOLOL when in doubt and have nothing to say, drag up bush lol!

because every loser is allowed to use bush as an excuse forever........... Wink

knothead

knothead

*Sage* wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL LMAO@ Lurch

lurch thinks hes got something with that bush thing. because bush went on national tv and told a lie to the country about the deaths being over a old utube video, even spent tax payer money telling the other country on their tv channels it was over a utube video....

LOLOLOL when in doubt and have nothing to say, drag up bush lol!

because every loser is allowed to use bush as an excuse forever........... Wink

**********************************************************

You don't have to like it but you have to live with Bush's legacy!!!

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum