You may think professional wrestlers are not qualified to speak on political issues. But I defy any one of you to dispute what is being revealed in this video.

If they'll lie to us about de Luna, they'll lie to us about anything. And this individual is asking questions which no one can answer. He is being completely ignored by the mainstream media.
Do yourselves a favor, and watch this interview. It's probably the most important thing you will ever see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2uVq4yZhIw

Bob wrote:
If they'll lie to us about de Luna, they'll lie to us about anything. And this individual is asking questions which no one can answer. He is being completely ignored by the mainstream media.
Do yourselves a favor, and watch this interview. It's probably the most important thing you will ever see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2uVq4yZhIw

Despite his condition, he makes some very valid points. What in particular caught your attention? Are you a convert now? And where the hell is Teo?

Floridatexan wrote:

Bob wrote:
If they'll lie to us about de Luna, they'll lie to us about anything. And this individual is asking questions which no one can answer. He is being completely ignored by the mainstream media.
Do yourselves a favor, and watch this interview. It's probably the most important thing you will ever see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2uVq4yZhIw

Despite his condition, he makes some very valid points. What in particular caught your attention? Are you a convert now? And where the hell is Teo?

I am now absolutely convinced that what he said is all true. Especially the part about Bush Senior being in a hotel room with Osama Bin Laden at the same time the WTC was being imploded. That the two were in cahoots to steal that $100 million which was stashed at the bottom of the Twin Towers.
And I agree with him 100% that no loved one of any of the people on the planes has ever been heard from. Because, as he said, there were no people on the planes.
He's a remarkably informed and articulate individual.

Sal wrote:There went two minutes of my morning that I'll never get back.

Thanks, Bob!

If you think that wrastler is entertaining you aint seen nuthin till you've seen this. But it doesn't really get entertaining until about the 1:40 mark on the time counter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1APM6t1ASqw

Bob wrote:

Sal wrote:There went two minutes of my morning that I'll never get back.

Thanks, Bob!

If you think that wrastler is entertaining you aint seen nuthin till you've seen this. But it doesn't really get entertaining until about the 1:40 mark on the time counter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1APM6t1ASqw

Why are you so fascinated with the Iron Sheik? Or Hulk Hogan? They're actors with athletic skills. I knew one local wrestling star (our children went to kindergarden together)...he's nothing like his public persona.

Floridatexan wrote:

Why are you so fascinated with the Iron Sheik? Or Hulk Hogan? They're actors with athletic skills. I knew one local wrestling star (our children went to kindergarden together)...he's nothing like his public persona.

I'm not so much fascinated with "wrastlin" per se but I am very fascinated with the Sheik for a variety of reasons.
One was learning that he actually is from Tehran. It's a pretty remarkable individual who has that as his background and then ends up doing shtick like this.
Another is how he seems to totally escape the same confines of political correctness which ties the hands of so many entertainers. He constantly slanders "jews", "fags" and every other group and does it in the most vile way imaginable. But if you read the long comment blogs below those youtubes they all love him for it and so do I.
What his gig boils down to is the ultimate statement of something which is totally lacking in any inhibitions. And I've always been more entertained by stuff like that than just about anything else.

[quote="Bob"]
If they'll lie to us about de Luna, they'll lie to us about anything. And this individual is asking questions which no one can answer. He is being completely ignored by the mainstream media.
Do yourselves a favor, and watch this interview. It's probably the most important thing you will ever see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2uVq4yZhIw[/quote

As most of you know I have always felt that the airplane crashes and the firing of the explosives were the result of perfect timing. I feel that most Americans absolutely refuse to believe that it was a planned demolition on the basis of not allowing themselves and the world to think that this horrifying event could have been pulled off by our own countrymen. They just stick their heads into the sand and deny it. So many parts of it do not add up. Molten steel, both towers dropping straight down. building seven going down the same way when it did not even take a hit.
Something this character said that is true is "where are the relatives of the people that were on the planes?"
Think of all the tragedies that have occurred where for weeks and months we see people being interviewed about the loss of loved ones. Lots and lots of people were interviewed who lost family members in the WTC but no one from the airliners. maybe because they were very expensive "drones".
People seem to think it would be unpatriotic to believe it was all planned demolition. It was done with flawless timing and they succeeded. I'm not saying Bush knew about but some people knew. I expect most of them have disappeared.
With enough money just about anything can be done.

I think one of the most telling facts is the revelation that Bush & Co. started planning to attack Iraq in the first month he was in office. That's according to Paul O'Neill, Bush's first Treasury Secretary, who contributed to Ron Suskind's THE PRICE OF LOYALTY and who has given several interviews on the subject.

http://rense.com/general47/before.htm

--------------------------------------------


FORMER TREASURY SECRETARY PAUL O'NEILL SAYS INVASION OF IRAQ WAS PLANNED IN THE FIRST DAYS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION LONG BEFORE 9/11, IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW SUNDAY ON "60 MINUTES"


The Bush Administration began laying plans for an invasion of Iraq including the use of American troops within days of President Bush's inauguration in January of 2001, not eight months later after the 9/11 attacks as has been previously reported. That is what former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill says in his first interview about his time as a White House insider. O'Neill talks to Lesley Stahl in the interview, to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Jan. 11 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," he tells Stahl. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap," says O'Neill.

O'Neill, fired by the White House for his disagreement on tax cuts, is the main source for an upcoming book, "The Price of Loyalty," authored by Ron Suskind. Suskind says O'Neill and other White House insiders he interviewed gave him documents that show that in the first three months of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for removing Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of Saddam's downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping troops, war crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil. "There are memos," Suskind tells Stahl, "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan for Post-Saddam Iraq.'" A Pentagon document, says Suskind, titled "Foreign Suitors For Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," outlines areas of oil exploration. "It talks about contractors around the world from...30, 40 countries and which ones have what intentions on oil in Iraq," Suskind says.

In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one in a National Security Council meeting questioned why Iraq should be invaded. "It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" says O'Neill in the book.

Suskind also writes about a White House meeting in which he says the president seems to be wavering about going forward with his second round of tax cuts. "Haven't we already given money to rich people," Suskind says the president uttered, according to a nearly verbatim transcript of an Economic Team meeting he says he obtained from someone at the meeting, "Shouldn't we be giving money to the middle?"

O'Neill, who was asked to resign because of his opposition to the tax cut, says he doesn't think his tell-all account in this book will be attacked by his former employers as sour grapes. "I will be really disappointed if [the White House] reacts that way," he tells Stahl. "I can't imagine that I am going to be attacked for telling the truth."


Comment
Thomas Buyea
1-10-4

Well, now we know even better what we already knew:

That the Bush (Zionist Neocon) administration carried out 911 - or at least knew the Terrorists were going to do it - so they held back the fighter planes and put explosives in the WTC to make sure it would fall down! I guess he would expect us to consider him humane for waiting an hour to set off the explosives so some of the people could get out?

I hope this is the straw that will break this camel's back. Impeachment Now! And then Charges of War Crimes Nationally and Internationally.