Obama trying to screw over religious groups...AGAIN

PACEDOG#1 wrote:but, they have learned their lesson and he has to answer for his actions.



http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/obama-reopens-rift-with-religious-groups-87088.html?hp=t1

W_T_M wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:but, they have learned their lesson and he has to answer for his actions.



http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/obama-reopens-rift-with-religious-groups-87088.html?hp=t1

...................................................

Say what you meant faux-christian.


"Obama trying to fuck over religious groups...AGAIN."

What a phony POS you are, constantly co-opting religion for your neo-con political agenda. But you really don't support religious freedom, right down to your bigotry against Islam.

How about those Buddhist, or even the Wiccan's...?

Since the majority of the grousing comes from the Catholic folk, does that mean you agree with their archaic dogma...?



Better hurry....you'll be late for the public stoning of an uppity teen.

Chrissy wrote:You know. They are not very smart. I beleive they already offer free birth control at gov clinics now. why did they have to put it in the ACA? It wasnt needed. They could have just opened the birth control up to all( if its not already) at these clinics. Same for the abortion debate. just allow the gov clinics to administer that, it doesnt need to be part of the ins. we are going to pay for it all anyway.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:You know. They are not very smart. I beleive they already offer free birth control at gov clinics now. why did they have to put it in the ACA? It wasnt needed. They could have just opened the birth control up to all( if its not already) at these clinics. Same for the abortion debate. just allow the gov clinics to administer that, it doesnt need to be part of the ins. we are going to pay for it all anyway.

This is a perfect example of the ignorance on this issue. You are not eligible for Govt. clinics when you have health insurance. The issue is employer paid birth control through religious employers.

Chrissy wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:You know. They are not very smart. I beleive they already offer free birth control at gov clinics now. why did they have to put it in the ACA? It wasnt needed. They could have just opened the birth control up to all( if its not already) at these clinics. Same for the abortion debate. just allow the gov clinics to administer that, it doesnt need to be part of the ins. we are going to pay for it all anyway.

This is a perfect example of the ignorance on this issue. You are not eligible for Govt. clinics when you have health insurance. The issue is employer paid birth control through religious employers.

well your right. I dont know a lot about sucking off the gov tit.

never the less, they can change the rules of what they are providing at gov clinics. They dont need to incert into the healthcare bill.

I mean we already pay all those laxy ased gov employees at these clinics, they might as well work. We could keep them busy whacking off tons of little lib babies and plenty of mexican babies. And just think of all the benefits we would save if we provided these groups birth control

so, in fact. you are ignorant. because your only solution comes from what your told by your gov.

your gov could provide these services without making it a ins thing. But dont worry. Im sure the big ins industry agrees with you.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:You know. They are not very smart. I beleive they already offer free birth control at gov clinics now. why did they have to put it in the ACA? It wasnt needed. They could have just opened the birth control up to all( if its not already) at these clinics. Same for the abortion debate. just allow the gov clinics to administer that, it doesnt need to be part of the ins. we are going to pay for it all anyway.

This is a perfect example of the ignorance on this issue. You are not eligible for Govt. clinics when you have health insurance. The issue is employer paid birth control through religious employers.

well your right. I dont know a lot about sucking off the gov tit.

never the less, they can change the rules of what they are providing at gov clinics. They dont need to incert into the healthcare bill.

I mean we already pay all those laxy ased gov employees at these clinics, they might as well work. We could keep them busy whacking off tons of little lib babies and plenty of mexican babies. And just think of all the benefits we would save if we provided these groups birth control

so, in fact. you are ignorant. because your only solution comes from what your told by your gov.

your gov could provide these services without making it a ins thing. But dont worry. Im sure the big ins industry agrees with you.

I noticed you didn't say "black babies?" I'm sure that's what you wanted to say. So you agree the Govt. should provide birth control? So much for freebies,huh? The issue is about insurance paying for it not Govt. from religious employers. I guess you agree religious employers should be telling people when they can have babies because they don't agree w/ birth control? Let's just switch from the Govt. telling us what to employers? That makes it better.LOL!

PACEDOG#1 wrote:LOL, you guys are FULL of hate.

Did I not say "religious" groups? Does that not include all others? If others had a dog in the fight, they would be included. I didn't make up the beliefs of the Wiccans and Buddhists, sorry.

It looks like WTM is a Catholic hater along with ZVug who hates Jews as well.

Now my bigotry of Islam, well, you might have me there, but that is something Christ will deal with me about and to you I will not have to answer. My experiences with this group since the 80s has melded my opinions and feelings for Islamic people. It's not all of them though, but as a group none call out their extremist brothers who engage in terroristic behavior across the world and still believe the Crusades are being fought. Until the radical groups are controlled and they can actually practice what they preach- "religion of peace", they are no friend of mine. I will be tactful and treat them with respect when I engage with them where I have to, but it will be done in a guarded and watchful manner.

W_T_M wrote:
........................................................

STFU you racist POS faux-christian. I'm no Catholic hater, but you support AND agree with Hagee, who teaches that Catholics are a godless cult.

You are the single most duplicitous phony MF on this forum. From disrespect and outright defiance and hatred of the POTUS (your CIC) to your constant misuse of scripture to bolster your extremist world view, I pray that God will strike you deader than your puffed up pious rhetoric.

If you have one hair on your pathetic ass, post your real name and deal with the fallout you blowhard coward.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

W_T_M wrote:
........................................................

STFU you racist POS faux-christian. I'm no Catholic hater, but you support AND agree with Hagee, who teaches that Catholics are a godless cult.

You are the single most duplicitous phony MF on this forum. From disrespect and outright defiance and hatred of the POTUS (your CIC) to your constant misuse of scripture to bolster your extremist world view, I pray that God will strike you deader than your puffed up pious rhetoric.

If you have one hair on your pathetic ass, post your real name and deal with the fallout you blowhard coward.

Well good afternoon to you too KKKing of Hate!

I love you too. Do you kiss your mom with that mouth as well?

I am glad that I do not take this place as serious as you do.

Guess you are mad at the New Yorkers who are being defiant about gun control and planning to form militias? Bet it just makes your blood boil doesn't it...that people might actually have an opinion differing from the folks actually running the government. That's sort of how this AMERICA thing started ya know? You would have been a great Torie back in the 1770s.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:You are a few sandwiches short of a picnic bud.

Are you posting from Lakeview or what?

W_T_M wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:You are a few sandwiches short of a picnic bud.

Are you posting from Lakeview or what?

.........................................................

Come on...you can't do better than that...? LOL

Tell us mr. false profit....do you agree with Hagee like you posted before...?

Hmmm. Doesn't that make you anti-Catholic AND anti-Mormon. Hagee says they are cults. What say you...?

You have posted lie after lie in the last few days and when challenged, you post another attack.

This ain't working for ya troll. Ya got a wheel in the ditch.

You say I take this too seriously....?

When some gun nut talks openly about supporting armed insurrection, stockpiles ammunition and loads up on even more weapons for his little armory...it get's my attention.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:....and a couple cans short of a six pack.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

W_T_M wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:You are a few sandwiches short of a picnic bud.

Are you posting from Lakeview or what?

.........................................................

Come on...you can't do better than that...? LOL

Tell us mr. false profit....do you agree with Hagee like you posted before...?

Hmmm. Doesn't that make you anti-Catholic AND anti-Mormon. Hagee says they are cults. What say you...?

You have posted lie after lie in the last few days and when challenged, you post another attack.

This ain't working for ya troll. Ya got a wheel in the ditch.

You say I take this too seriously....?

When some gun nut talks openly about supporting armed insurrection, stockpiles ammunition and loads up on even more weapons for his little armory...it get's my attention.

Have you called out all those New Yorkers personally? Have you sent a letter to each member of the Oathkeepers? Did you send letters and go to every forum in every state that sent a petition to the WH asking for permission to leave the union? You've got your work cut out for you so get to it.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

Is he a gun nut too?