Jobs report: U.S. Adds 157,000 Jobs; Unemployment Rate 7.9%

Quickly. Someone freak out.....something to do with Obama.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

We shed 9,000 government jobs and gained 166,000 private sector jobs in January.

boards of FL wrote:We shed 9,000 government jobs and gained 166,000 private sector jobs in January.

finally good news.

Are you really trying to make people think this is good news? LOL

It was a cute try.

8.5 million people have left the rolls all together

unemployment numbers going up at all is not a good sign. there should be a increase alone from the hiring of all the temporary income tax people, those that file taxes and all those who stand on the side of the road waving and dancing with that sign.

2012 payroll figures revised upward by 442,000.

Margin Call wrote:2012 payroll figures revised upward by 442,000.

Why dont we cut the partisan bull crap?

I dont care about the fuzzy math ok. The election is over so lets stop pretending the job situation and the economy is good. It doesnt look well for two men who obviously are good with this stuff to continue this charade.

Chrissy wrote:

Margin Call wrote:2012 payroll figures revised upward by 442,000.

Why dont we cut the partisan bull crap?

I dont care about the fuzzy math ok. The election is over so lets stop pretending the job situation and the economy is good. It doesnt look well for two men who obviously are good with this stuff to continue this charade.

So, now up and down are partisan terms? Dear God!

Chrissy wrote:

Margin Call wrote:2012 payroll figures revised upward by 442,000.

Why dont we cut the partisan bull crap?

I dont care about the fuzzy math ok. The election is over so lets stop pretending the job situation and the economy is good. It doesnt look well for two men who obviously are good with this stuff to continue this charade.

Define a good economy. Are you under the impression that GDP is crashing, as well?

Im aware of the propped up data.

I think you should ask youself. Would I still be so happy abou these numbers is GW Bush was in office?

revisions, revisions and household surveys. please keep your data. At this point I think Id prepfer to monitor the weather by looking out the door.

Oh and you know that little graph you just showwed me. if you go by that GWB did a wonderful job. look at that pitch from 2000-2008

Chrissy wrote:Im aware of the propped up data.

I think you should ask youself. Would I still be so happy abou these numbers is GW Bush was in office?

revisions, revisions and household surveys. please keep your data. At this point I think Id prepfer to monitor the weather by looking out the door.

Oh and you know that little graph you just showwed me. if you go by that GWB did a wonderful job. look at that pitch from 2000-2008

So, you're testing the null hypothesis by looking out your front door?

Further, if GW did a good job in your eyes, then you must fucking love Obama!!!!!!!

Margin Call wrote:

Chrissy wrote:Im aware of the propped up data.

I think you should ask youself. Would I still be so happy abou these numbers is GW Bush was in office?

revisions, revisions and household surveys. please keep your data. At this point I think Id prepfer to monitor the weather by looking out the door.

Oh and you know that little graph you just showwed me. if you go by that GWB did a wonderful job. look at that pitch from 2000-2008

So, you're testing the null hypothesis by looking out your front door?

Further, if GW did a good job in your eyes, then you must fucking love Obama!!!!!!!

Actually, you should be praising bush from your graph here. It clearly shows bush had it going on. If you are going to use that graph to prove your point, you are going to have to agree that the data in it shows bush was wonderful.

and if we are going to also beleive that when you and boards tell us that it takes 2 years for policies to actually show results, then I think we can pretty much credit bushes presidency with pretty much all of the data in that report.