How minutely detailed the fake moon landing was.

Everything you read on this page about the wristwatch is all bullshit.
That's because, since the moon landing was a hoax and a fake, of course no wristwatch ever went to the moon.

The lengths they went to to make this hoax are just mindboggling. They even made all this shit up about a watch going to the moon.

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/accutron

Bob I used to believe in Flash Gordon when I was 7....




These were probably better done than the NASA hoax....

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Bob I used to believe in Flash Gordon when I was 7....




These were probably better done than the NASA hoax....

I know. It's about the saddest chapter in American history that Buzz Aldrin, who flew 65 combat missions as a jet fighter pilot in Korea, and who has a PHD in astronautics from MIT, is really nothing but a lying lowlife phony who has lied through his teeth in such detail over and over for the last few decades about what it was like to descend to and walk on the lunar surface.
I mean he has so much gall that he wrote an entire phony book about it recounting every detail when all he had to do was stay mum about the hoax.

I agree with you, teo, this spaceship Buster Crabbe flew in is a helluva lot more convincing than that lunar module I saw in the Air and Space Museum earlier this year...



I mean all you have to do is look at that spaceship to see how much more real it looks. Notice like any self-respecting spaceship, it has exhaust pipes coming out of the side of it like a hotrod. And the exhaust pipes are forward of the rocket engine where of course they would be in any real space hotrod.

The phony lunar module, on the other hand, looks like something a kid would make with an erector set...

Bob just the take off from the moon was a joke...watch it...no stabilizing rockets and no exhaust plume. The man that worked on the design of the engine himself said there should have been a huge red exhaust cloud from the lift off rockets....if he doesn't even believe it why should anyone else....? It's okay Bob drink your Fluoride water and rest....

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Bob just the take off from the moon was a joke...watch it...no stabilizing rockets and no exhaust plume. The man that worked on the design of the engine himself said there should have been a huge red exhaust cloud from the lift off rockets....if he doesn't even believe it why should anyone else....? It's okay Bob drink your Fluoride water and rest....

So now the man who designed the ascent stage of the lunar module himself says it was all fake?
Teo, you've become like herman cain and sarah palin. It's impossible to even try to parody the real you. Because the real you is more humourous than any parody could ever be. lol

If someone determined the moon landing was a fake.....was the moon orbit a fake?

Take a look at this, teo...



Flash definitely looks a little light in the loafers. And that feller he's got his arm around looks like a drag queen.

I think we may have just discovered that outer space is being overrun with queers.

2seaoat wrote:If someone determined the moon landing was a fake.....was the moon orbit a fake?

Yes the orbiting of the moon had to be fake too. Since one of the key parts of the fake moon landing theory is that no humans can survive going through the Van Allen Belt (which is between the earth and moon). That reknowned scientist Alex Jones has confirmed that. lol

I think the orbit was observable from the earth. So, why was there a staged event concerning the landing? Did the mission determine they could not safely make it to the surface and started a studio operation to keep funding? To fool the Russians? I guess what I do not understand is after the failure and fire on the launch pad which killed three Astronauts, they actually expanded the budget for NASA, so I certainly do not understand the attempt to commit a fraud as a funding issue. I guess as a poker player, I need to see what our motivation would be for faking the landing when we clearly were orbiting the moon. It does not make sense, but I am all ears if there is a logical reason to fake the moon landing, and I guess the part which I would need to understand is the "who" faked the landing. Was it just NASA, fooling the rest of the government? If that was the case, how do you keep a couple thousand people silent who were controllers and lower level personnel? Was it President Nixon or the CIA who were fooling Congress and the American People.......for what end goal? Was it some secret organization which controls America, which I am ignorant?

In the end, anything is possible, but if I played poker with the same methodology which establishes that the moon landing was a fake, I would not be playing poker very long. Yes, it could have happened, but why would they fake it when they were orbiting the moon?

I'm still trying to figure out the motive for why all the world's best test pilots, many of them combat heroes (the Apollo astronauts) would want to lie through their teeth and make all this shit up, seaoat.
And then there's also hundreds of the world's most talented scientists and engineers who claim they built a space vehicle which could land on the moon, designed a space mission which could carry astronauts to a moon landing, etc etc.
I can't figure out the motive for all those individuals being a party to the biggest fraud in human history either.

So far the only motive that anyone has ever come forth with is "they all gladly went along with this hoax because they felt it was patriotic to beat the rooskies even if the whole thing was a fraud".

You see, seaoat, lack of believable motive is always the downfall of these conspiracy nutters. And when no believable motive exists, they just spin up a goofy one and then tell us "if you don't accept what we're saying then you've just been brainwashed by the mainstream media because you're a mindless sheep". lol

I look at the fake moon landing as the burden remains on those who believe the same. Like a criminal trial the folks who think the moon landing was faked must prove the same beyond a reasonable doubt because the presumption of innocence must lie with our scientist, military, congress, and the Presidents who have followed. To achieve beyond a reasonable doubt, I am going to need to understand how they can discount clear evidence that we actually orbited the moon. If they can show me proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to our not orbiting the moon.....well I will begin listening to other evidence and being less sheep like......but in the absence of evidence......which leaves no reasonable doubt.....I am believing we landed on the moon, and that the Cubs have not won the world series in almost a hundred years.

2seaoat wrote:I am believing we landed on the moon, and that the Cubs have not won the world series in almost a hundred years.

It could be that the Cubs have won the last five World Series but The New World Order has covered that up by getting the mainstream media to lie about it like they have the moon landing.

Yes everything worked as tested...no problems here let's head for the moon....

I went to the link.....saw this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wAvxQfusWU&feature=fvwrel

How cool are these tires?

Bob wrote:

2seaoat wrote:I am believing we landed on the moon, and that the Cubs have not won the world series in almost a hundred years.

It could be that the Cubs have won the last five World Series but The New World Order has covered that up by getting the mainstream media to lie about it like they have the moon landing.

Could it be possible that Romney and Obama are not real people; that they might be cleverly drawn animations and it is all a bunch of bunk invented to make vast sums of wealth for the broadcasting networks therefore making television viewing more compellingly interesting for Americans who have nothing better to do other than looking for something to argue with one another about?

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Well now if that isn't proof the whole thing's a fraud then I don't know what is.

Yella wrote:

Could it be possible that Romney and Obama are not real people; that they might be cleverly drawn animations and it is all a bunch of bunk invented to make vast sums of wealth for the broadcasting networks therefore making television viewing more compellingly interesting for Americans who have nothing better to do other than looking for something to argue with one another about?

That's a lot more believable theory than any I've heard yet, yella. That even makes more sense than the theory of the so-called real-life election and real-life obama and romney.
I've been watching the tv news on their campaign blatherings today. And it's just so surreal how they're delivering these one-liners that were obviously written by a team of professional writers. Even if they are flesh and blood and not animations there's not a damn thing real about them.

Bob wrote:

Yella wrote:

Could it be possible that Romney and Obama are not real people; that they might be cleverly drawn animations and it is all a bunch of bunk invented to make vast sums of wealth for the broadcasting networks therefore making television viewing more compellingly interesting for Americans who have nothing better to do other than looking for something to argue with one another about?

That's a lot more believable theory than any I've heard yet, yella. That even makes more sense than the theory of the so-called real-life election and real-life obama and romney.
I've been watching the tv news on their campaign blatherings today. And it's just so surreal how they're delivering these one-liners that were obviously written by a team of professional writers. Even if they are flesh and blood and not animations there's not a damn thing real about them.

Its all about he unbelievable money that the Television Broadcasting networks are raking in.