Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Religious fundamentalists are sick puppies. Here's scientific proof:

+6
Vikingwoman
Telstar
bigdog
RealLindaL
PkrBum
Wordslinger
10 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Scientists have established a link between brain damage and religious fundamentalism
written by Bobby Azarian / Raw Story January 6, 2019
This explains a lot about our current political situation.

A study published in the journal Neuropsychologia has shown that religious fundamentalism is, in part, the result of a functional impairment in a brain region known as the prefrontal cortex. The findings suggest that damage to particular areas of the prefrontal cortex indirectly promotes religious fundamentalism by diminishing cognitive flexibility and openness—a psychology term that describes a personality trait which involves dimensions like curiosity, creativity, and open-mindedness.

Religious beliefs can be thought of as socially transmitted mental representations that consist of supernatural events and entities assumed to be real. Religious beliefs differ from empirical beliefs, which are based on how the world appears to be and are updated as new evidence accumulates or when new theories with better predictive power emerge. On the other hand, religious beliefs are not usually updated in response to new evidence or scientific explanations, and are therefore strongly associated with conservatism. They are fixed and rigid, which helps promote predictability and coherence to the rules of society among individuals within the group.
SPONSORED

Religious fundamentalism refers to an ideology that emphasizes traditional religious texts and rituals and discourages progressive thinking about religion and social issues. Fundamentalist groups generally oppose anything that questions or challenges their beliefs or way of life. For this reason, they are often aggressive towards anyone who does not share their specific set of supernatural beliefs, and towards science, as these things are seen as existential threats to their entire worldview.

Since religious beliefs play a massive role in driving and influencing human behavior throughout the world, it is important to understand the phenomenon of religious fundamentalism from a psychological and neurological perspective.

To investigate the cognitive and neural systems involved in religious fundamentalism, a team of researchers—led by Jordan Grafman of Northwestern University—conducted a study that utilized data from Vietnam War veterans that had been gathered previously. The vets were specifically chosen because a large number of them had damage to brain areas suspected of playing a critical role in functions related to religious fundamentalism. CT scans were analyzed comparing 119 vets with brain trauma to 30 healthy vets with no damage, and a survey that assessed religious fundamentalism was administered. While the majority of participants were Christians of some kind, 32.5% did not specify a particular religion.

Based on previous research, the experimenters predicted that the prefrontal cortex would play a role in religious fundamentalism, since this region is known to be associated with something called ‘cognitive flexibility’. This term refers to the brain’s ability to easily switch from thinking about one concept to another, and to think about multiple things simultaneously. Cognitive flexibility allows organisms to update beliefs in light of new evidence, and this trait likely emerged because of the obvious survival advantage such a skill provides. It is a crucial mental characteristic for adapting to new environments because it allows individuals to make more accurate predictions about the world under new and changing conditions.

Brain imaging research has shown that a major neural region associated with cognitive flexibility is the prefrontal cortex—specifically two areas known as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Additionally, the vmPFC was of interest to the researchers because past studies have revealed its connection to fundamentalist-type beliefs. For example, one study showed individuals with vmPFC lesions rated radical political statements as more moderate than people with normal brains, while another showed a direct connection between vmPFC damage and religious fundamentalism. For these reasons, in the present study, researchers looked at patients with lesions in both the vmPFC and the dlPFC, and searched for correlations between damage in these areas and responses to religious fundamentalism questionnaires.

According to Dr. Grafman and his team, since religious fundamentalism involves a strict adherence to a rigid set of beliefs, cognitive flexibility and open-mindedness present a challenge for fundamentalists. As such, they predicted that participants with lesions to either the vmPFC or the dlPFC would score low on measures of cognitive flexibility and trait openness and high on measures of religious fundamentalism.

The results showed that, as expected, damage to the vmPFC and dlPFC was associated with religious fundamentalism. Further tests revealed that this increase in religious fundamentalism was caused by a reduction in cognitive flexibility and openness resulting from the prefrontal cortex impairment. Cognitive flexibility was assessed using a standard psychological card sorting test that involved categorizing cards with words and images according to rules. Openness was measured using a widely-used personality survey known as the NEO Personality Inventory. The data suggests that damage to the vmPFC indirectly promotes religious fundamentalism by suppressing both cognitive flexibility and openness.

These findings are important because they suggest that impaired functioning in the prefrontal cortex—whether from brain trauma, a psychological disorder, a drug or alcohol addiction, or simply a particular genetic profile—can make an individual susceptible to religious fundamentalism. And perhaps in other cases, extreme religious indoctrination harms the development or proper functioning of the prefrontal regions in a way that hinders cognitive flexibility and openness.

The authors emphasize that cognitive flexibility and openness aren’t the only things that make brains vulnerable to religious fundamentalism. In fact, their analyses showed that these factors only accounted for a fifth of the variation in fundamentalism scores. Uncovering those additional causes, which could be anything from genetic predispositions to social influences, is a future research project that the researchers believe will occupy investigators for many decades to come, given how complex and widespread religious fundamentalism is and will likely continue to be for some time.

By investigating the cognitive and neural underpinnings of religious fundamentalism, we can better understand how the phenomenon is represented in the connectivity of the brain, which could allow us to someday inoculate against rigid or radical belief systems through various kinds of mental and cognitive exercises.
[/b]

PkrBum

PkrBum

I'd say that the belief in a large central govt requires just as much faith as religious fundamentalism.

In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

RealLindaL



PkrBum wrote:In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

You mean, just like the severely misplaced devotion of so many toward Donald Trump?

bigdog



I don't think so Wordslinger, because if you consider human beings worldwide, there's an awfully large percentage of them that believe in a greater power and who practice some religion than would be normal for it to be a mental illness.
It's societal, it's part of fitting into a community, and it is more a sense of "wanting to believe" than it is of actual belief. You'd be shocked to know how many Baptists are sitting on those benches every week wondering if what they think they believe is enough to get them to heaven, or if there really is a heaven, or if the fact that they doubt it means they are inferior to whoever is sitting next to them that is obviously so absolutely sure about it all. They don't go to church on Sunday to worship, they go to reassure themselves that when their parents brainwashed them as children they weren't being lied to. And those that they "fellowship" with are the friends they hang out with who give them reassurance.
The louder they scream at others that they "know," usually the more doubtful they really are.
Their rigid adherence to their church's beliefs gives them confidence that they must be doing the right thing, since so many people around them are doing the same. It's a cult of the insecure seeking something definite and unchanging to guide their lives by, and they never really find it.  No matter what they may tell you. Everyone doubts and nobody knows.
Needing something solid may even be more sane than insane, it's certainly a human thing, not a mental illness.
Everybody has to figure out what they can get through life on. Personally, I recommend Lexapro or Xanex Very Happy But I don't see any need to disparage fundamentalists if they actually lived by the teachings of Christ. It's just that they don't. And they all want a reward for themselves and want to see other people burn in hell. There isn't any hell and if there was, I couldn't worship any God that made one. Hey, I better stick to the Xanex, huh?

PkrBum

PkrBum

RealLindaL wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

You mean, just like the severely misplaced devotion of so many toward Donald Trump?

The potus isn't the whole of govt in this country.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:I'd say that the belief in a large central govt requires just as much faith as religious fundamentalism.

In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

The subject of this thread is about religious fundamentalism being a mental illness.  If you don't know the difference of trusting a government from believing in an omnipotent god and wanting to force everyone to believe the way you do, that's a different mental illness.  

You spew off continually here as a foam at the mouth conservative fundamentalist who believes public roads, schools, hospitals, social security plans and medical insurance, etc. are all evil.  Clearly, with such a viewpoint you qualify as a fundamentalist who is mentally ill.  LOL

PkrBum

PkrBum

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:I'd say that the belief in a large central govt requires just as much faith as religious fundamentalism.

In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

The subject of this thread is about religious fundamentalism being a mental illness.  If you don't know the difference of trusting a government from believing in an omnipotent god and wanting to force everyone to believe the way you do, that's a different mental illness.  

You spew off continually here as a foam at the mouth conservative fundamentalist who believes public roads, schools, hospitals, social security plans and medical insurance, etc. are all evil.  Clearly, with such a viewpoint you qualify as a fundamentalist who is mentally ill.  LOL

You must be stupid to assign things to me that you know I've never expressed.

Take a nap or something.

Telstar

Telstar

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:I'd say that the belief in a large central govt requires just as much faith as religious fundamentalism.

In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

The subject of this thread is about religious fundamentalism being a mental illness.  If you don't know the difference of trusting a government from believing in an omnipotent god and wanting to force everyone to believe the way you do, that's a different mental illness.  

You spew off continually here as a foam at the mouth conservative fundamentalist who believes public roads, schools, hospitals, social security plans and medical insurance, etc. are all evil.  Clearly, with such a viewpoint you qualify as a fundamentalist who is mentally ill.  LOL

You must be stupid to assign things to me that you know I've never expressed.

Take a nap or something.






Religious fundamentalists are sick puppies.  Here's scientific proof: Russia39

RealLindaL



PkrBum wrote:
RealLindaL wrote:
PkrBum wrote:In fact... it's a religion itself. There's certainly more sound evidence that it's misplaced devotion.

You mean, just like the severely misplaced devotion of so many toward Donald Trump?

The potus isn't the whole of govt in this country.

DUH, really?? But hell, he may as well be, when the Senate isn't even permitted to vote on legislation that Trump may not approve of. So who needs the Senate? Or even the House? May as well just appoint Trump the dictator he apparently longs to be.

Vikingwoman



bigdog wrote:I don't think so Wordslinger, because if you consider human beings worldwide, there's an awfully large percentage of them that believe in a greater power and who practice some religion than would be normal for it to be a mental illness.
It's societal, it's part of fitting into a community, and it is more a sense of "wanting to believe" than it is of actual belief. You'd be shocked to know how many Baptists are sitting on those benches every week wondering if what they think they believe is enough to get them to heaven, or if there really is a heaven, or if the fact that they doubt it means they are inferior to whoever is sitting next to them that is obviously so absolutely sure about it all. They don't go to church on Sunday to worship, they go to reassure themselves that when their parents brainwashed them as children they weren't being lied to. And those that they "fellowship" with are the friends they hang out with who give them reassurance.
The louder they scream at others that they "know," usually the more doubtful they really are.
Their rigid adherence to their church's beliefs gives them confidence that they must be doing the right thing, since so many people around them are doing the same. It's a cult of the insecure seeking something definite and unchanging to guide their lives by, and they never really find it.  No matter what they may tell you. Everyone doubts and nobody knows.
Needing something solid may even be more sane than insane, it's certainly a human thing, not a mental illness.
Everybody has to figure out what they can get through life on. Personally, I recommend Lexapro or Xanex Very Happy But I don't see any need to disparage fundamentalists if they actually lived by the teachings of Christ. It's just that they don't. And they all want a reward for themselves and want to see other people burn in hell. There isn't any hell and if there was, I couldn't worship any God that made one. Hey, I better stick to the Xanex, huh?

You're talking about two different things here. Believing and hoping in a higher power and religious fundamentalists are miles apart. Fundamentalists spew speaking in tongues and hearing God talk to them. They are mentally ill. They're the kind when in times of crisis like when you're life is in danger would pray rather than taking action because God is going to take care of them. Most people know God isn't going to pay the rent or buy food but they don't. I know people who believe God is going to heal them and rely on that. The last thing I would do in an emergency is pray or depend on God to heal my cancer. I had a cousin tell me yesterday there is a reason God allows little children to suffer w/ cancer and doesn't intervene and we should accept that as well as why God let 6 million Jews go to the gas chamber. Shocked

bigdog



I kind of know what a fundamentalist is, having been one while growing up in a church that considered Southern Baptists too "liberal" for them. We could neither dance, drink, gamble or engage in "mixed bathing" (which a findamentalist knows is when boys and girls go to the beach and swim together.
When I grew up I became a "liberal" fundamentalist Southern Baptist.
So I don't need an education.
A whole lot of fundamentalists would call you crazy if you said you could talk in tongues-that's assembly of God who are even further to the right than Southern Baptists.
But NO, they are not all crazy. They are people just like we are who are hunting an answer to the ages old question of why we all have to be mortal, and they aren't able to accept it. Life is too hard for them not to believe there must be an afterlife,, and to strengthen that belief, they join with others who think like them, a perfectly normal thing to do. Through the ages these flawed groups of people have developed some strange doctrines that keep them together that don't make any sense to people on the outside, and their pastors do take advantage of their desperate need for security by telling them to behave in certain ways and they'll get to heaven. They're just brainwashed. They're no crazier than anyone else-they allow the brainwashing because it gives them a kind of peace, just like some people smoke weed, some people drink alcohol, some people seek solace in continuing a family heritage, as Sinatra famously said "whatever gets you through the night, baby." Yeah, some of them are obnoxious, so are some alcoholics and some druggies, and I'd venture to say, some atheists who are desperate for everybody else to be an atheist too. It's the evangelical part that's annoying, and you can be evangelical about a lot of things and just annoy the hell out of other people.
If only the people you are talking about were "fundamentalists" there wouldn't have been enough of them to get Trump elected. Most fundies take their kids to the doctor when they're sick, what makes them a fundie is the fact that they believe Jonah really was swallowed by a whale. That's brainwashing that they allow to happen to be part of the group. That's all it is.

Vikingwoman



I disagree. It is a form of mental illness only it's voluntary one. It's delusional and that is a mental illness. They disregard the absurdity of their beliefs knowing it is illogical in realism. It's magical thinking which is the same as delusions. They would never entertain someone living to be 975 years old and a ship that encompassed all the animals in the world in everyday life yet they believe these stories. You can have a form of mental illness and function normally except in this area.

bigdog



When you take it that far though, are you not saying that anyone who believes in an afterlife is crazy? The evidence is overwhelming that when you're dead, you're just dead. An afterlife is no more crazy than someone being swallowed by a whale, is it?
And yet, for many centuries people all over the world have chosen (your definition of crazy) to believe something with no scientific probability at all.

Whether I agree with them or not, I'm not willing to say that the majority of mankind is crazy and have chosen to be so. There's a certain elitism that apparently comes to some people on the left that leads to an evangelical atheism. It's no more attractive to me than evangelical fundamentalism. I simply believe in leaving people alone about what gets them through life, and definitely not making proclamations about their sanity or insanity.
Brainwashing is one thing, claiming differences in configurations of the brain is another, and calling over half the people on the planet nuts because they believe in something they can't see and you don't is just rude. Sorry, but that's my opinion.
And I do despise Trump voters as much as anyone else.

PkrBum

PkrBum

I really don't see much difference between a religious fundamentalist and a devout govt interventionist.

Neither put limits on their deity or the scope of its reach. Both require conditioning imo.

Telstar

Telstar

PkrBum wrote:I really don't see much difference between a religious fundamentalist and a devout govt interventionist.

Neither put limits on their deity or the scope of its reach. Both require conditioning imo.
Religious fundamentalists are sick puppies.  Here's scientific proof: Russia44

Vikingwoman



bigdog wrote:When you take it that far though, are you not saying that anyone who believes in an afterlife is crazy? The evidence is overwhelming that when you're dead, you're just dead. An afterlife is no more crazy than someone being swallowed by a whale, is it?
And yet, for many centuries people all over the world have chosen (your definition of crazy) to believe something with no scientific probability at all.

Whether I agree with them or not, I'm not willing to say that the majority of mankind is crazy and have chosen to be so. There's a certain elitism that apparently comes to some people on the left that leads to an evangelical atheism. It's no more attractive to me than evangelical fundamentalism. I simply believe in leaving people alone about what gets them through life, and definitely not making proclamations about their sanity or insanity.
Brainwashing is one thing, claiming differences in configurations of the brain is another, and calling over half the people on the planet nuts because they believe in something they can't see and you don't is just rude. Sorry, but that's my opinion.
And I do despise Trump voters as much as anyone else.

Nobody asked you to say the majority of mankind is crazy. Just because you don't like facts doesn't make me rude. You're entitled to your opinion just like I am. If you believe in fairy tales and Gods that grant your wishes, you've got delusions. Sorry but that's my opinion and rudeness has nothing to do w/ it.

Deus X

Deus X

Smartphone users warned to be careful of the Antichrist

People's dependence on smartphones and modern technology could bring about the coming of the Antichrist, the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church has warned.

Speaking to Russian state TV, Patriarch Kirill said smartphone users should be careful when using the "worldwide web of gadgets" because it represented "an opportunity to gain global control over mankind".

"The Antichrist is the person who will be at the head of the worldwide web, controlling all of humankind," he said.

"Every time you use your gadget, whether you like it or not, whether you turn on your location or not, somebody can find out exactly where you are, exactly what your interests are and exactly what you are scared of," Patriarch Kirill told Rossiya 1.

"If not today, then tomorrow methods and technology could appear that will not just provide access to all information but will also allow the use of this information.

"Do you imagine what power will be concentrated in the hands of those who gain knowledge about what is going on in the world?

"Such control from one place forebodes the coming of the Antichrist."


https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46794556




I think he's already here.  And it probably explains this:


Earth’s magnetic field is acting up and geologists don’t know why

Erratic motion of north magnetic pole forces experts to update model that aids global navigation.

The release of the World Magnetic Model has been postponed to 30 January due to the ongoing US government shutdown.

Something strange is going on at the top of the world. Earth’s north magnetic pole has been skittering away from Canada and towards Siberia, driven by liquid iron sloshing within the planet’s core. The magnetic pole is moving so quickly that it has forced the world’s geomagnetism experts into a rare move.

The most recent version of the model came out in 2015 and was supposed to last until 2020 — but the magnetic field is changing so rapidly that researchers have to fix the model now. “The error is increasing all the time,” says Arnaud Chulliat, a geomagnetist at the University of Colorado Boulder and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Centers for Environmental Information.


https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00007-1



You didn't really think the shutdown was just about some stupid wall, did ya?

RealLindaL



Deus X wrote:
You didn't really think the shutdown was just about some stupid wall, did ya?

OIC, so this is the REAL emergency then, hm?

bigdog



Vikingwoman wrote:
bigdog wrote:When you take it that far though, are you not saying that anyone who believes in an afterlife is crazy? The evidence is overwhelming that when you're dead, you're just dead. An afterlife is no more crazy than someone being swallowed by a whale, is it?
And yet, for many centuries people all over the world have chosen (your definition of crazy) to believe something with no scientific probability at all.

Whether I agree with them or not, I'm not willing to say that the majority of mankind is crazy and have chosen to be so. There's a certain elitism that apparently comes to some people on the left that leads to an evangelical atheism. It's no more attractive to me than evangelical fundamentalism. I simply believe in leaving people alone about what gets them through life, and definitely not making proclamations about their sanity or insanity.
Brainwashing is one thing, claiming differences in configurations of the brain is another, and calling over half the people on the planet nuts because they believe in something they can't see and you don't is just rude. Sorry, but that's my opinion.
And I do despise Trump voters as much as anyone else.

Nobody asked you to say the majority of mankind is crazy. Just because you don't like facts doesn't make me rude. You're entitled to your opinion just like I am. If you believe in fairy tales and Gods that grant your wishes, you've got delusions. Sorry but that's my opinion and rudeness has nothing to do w/ it
And I never said the majority of mankind is crazy, but most people do claim to believe in some Godlike entity that they cannot see and science cannot prove.
I don't think they are delusional nor crazy. I think they have a need to use those so called "fairy tales and Gods that grant your wishes"(as you call them) to get through life without becoming a screaming pile of jello without any hope, unable to function well enough to get out of bed in the morning. And I don't see judging anyone for whatever helps them with that, so long as the government doesn't try to enforce it on me.
I also think there are some very strange things that happen in life that are not explainable by coincidence and definitely not by science. I've had a few happen to me and I cannot deny that they happened by saying they defied logic, because they did happen, and they did defy logic.
And I had a mother that, if she told you something had happened in a dream, you could almost mark it down on you calendar that it would happen shortly in the future. She once woke up from a midday nap and said that something bad had happened to a friend named Ruby. She called Ruby's house on the phone, got her husband, and he cried and told her  Ruby had just been killed in a car accident a few minutes before. A lot of people have stories like that, and I don't think you can discount them all. And I sure don't think they are all crazy.

Telstar

Telstar

Here's the real reason for the shutdown. The scheme was hatched by one of 45's ancestors.


polecat

polecat

Religious fundamentalists are sick puppies.  Here's scientific proof: Dwmdng10

Vikingwoman



bigdog wrote:
Vikingwoman wrote:
bigdog wrote:When you take it that far though, are you not saying that anyone who believes in an afterlife is crazy? The evidence is overwhelming that when you're dead, you're just dead. An afterlife is no more crazy than someone being swallowed by a whale, is it?
And yet, for many centuries people all over the world have chosen (your definition of crazy) to believe something with no scientific probability at all.

Whether I agree with them or not, I'm not willing to say that the majority of mankind is crazy and have chosen to be so. There's a certain elitism that apparently comes to some people on the left that leads to an evangelical atheism. It's no more attractive to me than evangelical fundamentalism. I simply believe in leaving people alone about what gets them through life, and definitely not making proclamations about their sanity or insanity.
Brainwashing is one thing, claiming differences in configurations of the brain is another, and calling over half the people on the planet nuts because they believe in something they can't see and you don't is just rude. Sorry, but that's my opinion.
And I do despise Trump voters as much as anyone else.

Nobody asked you to say the majority of mankind is crazy. Just because you don't like facts doesn't make me rude. You're entitled to your opinion just like I am. If you believe in fairy tales and Gods that grant your wishes, you've got delusions. Sorry but that's my opinion and rudeness has nothing to do w/ it
And I never said the majority of mankind is crazy, but most people do claim to believe in some Godlike entity that they cannot see and science cannot prove.
I don't think they are delusional nor crazy. I think they have a need to use those so called "fairy tales and Gods that grant your wishes"(as you call them) to get through life without becoming a screaming pile of jello without any hope, unable to function well enough to get out of bed in the morning. And I don't see judging anyone for whatever helps them with that, so long as the government doesn't try to enforce it on me.
I also think there are some very strange things that happen in life that are not explainable by coincidence and definitely not by science. I've had a few happen to me and I cannot deny that they happened by saying they defied logic, because they did happen, and they did defy logic.
And I had a mother that, if she told you something had happened in a dream, you could almost mark it down on you calendar that it would happen shortly in the future. She once woke up from a midday nap and said that something bad had happened to a friend named Ruby. She called Ruby's house on the phone, got her husband, and he cried and told her  Ruby had just been killed in a car accident a few minutes before. A lot of people have stories like that, and I don't think you can discount them all. And I sure don't think they are all crazy.

Regardless of your opinion, they are delusions. However, they are used is not the point. As I said you can have a mental illness and not be "crazy." There's tons of people out there w/ mental illnesses of varying kinds and... function. You just don't know the difference between mental illnesses and being "crazy."

bigdog



Well, Your definition of "crazy" would be a little different from mine then. You've said these people are "mentally ill, speak in tongues (few of them do), are delusional, have absurd, illogical beliefs and are brain damaged." Sorry if I'm such a moron that I just use the word "crazy" to describe your opinion of them, but it does seem to my simple mind that that is exactly what you are calling them.
And though I usually like Wordslinger's posts, I have absolutely no respect for this one. The study consists of men whose brains were damaged during war and compares their later beliefs to those of a completely different group, one who has not been wounded, perhaps who has never seen the violent combat of those who were damaged, and whose experiences in war and peace may have no similarities at all. It's as unscientific a study as I've ever read, to be honest with you.
Many things influence personality, life events as much as neuron transmission in the brain. War is a pretty damned big life event, and affects every person differently. Trying to figure out the mind of a religious fundamentalist from a brain damaged war vet is crazy. And Yeah, I think I can use that term to describe this study.
It's also a particulary prejudiced study in that it admits to finding the anticipated results, those results being that there is something faulty in the minds of religious people. It's not science trying to find an answer, it's science trying to prove an elitist prejudice.

Vikingwoman



Don't attribute to me things that I didn't say. I never said they were brain damaged nor some of the other things you said. Pointing out the delusions of religion is not an elitist prejudice. That's just a silly statement just like trying to justify believing in a delusion to get out of bed in the morning is ok. LOL!

bigdog



If you don't understand that the title and first post on this thread are out to prove that deeply religious people have a physical problem within their brains that cause them to be that way, then you didn't read the original post.
That's what the study was attempting to prove, but the study itself was completely unscientific.
It was an elitist study with a preconceived result.


If atheists want to "educate" the public, which they do seem to want to do nowadays (and why they do, I'll never understand), it won't happen by telling those people they are brain damaged and mentally inferior to begin with.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum