. Manafort's legal team says it was not proven by the prosecution's evidence and witnesses that those things were done at Manafort's personal direction or with his direct conscious knowledge.
That would not be the law. Could you imagine every person who used a tax preparer saying they had no "conscious knowledge of their tax return".......too funny, and not even handgrenade and horseshoe close. Also, if it was not proven, why did the judge deny a motion for a directed verdict, and then the defense put no evidence into the record.
Manafort will be found guilty eventually. It is a slam dunk case for the prosecution.
That would not be the law. Could you imagine every person who used a tax preparer saying they had no "conscious knowledge of their tax return".......too funny, and not even handgrenade and horseshoe close. Also, if it was not proven, why did the judge deny a motion for a directed verdict, and then the defense put no evidence into the record.
Manafort will be found guilty eventually. It is a slam dunk case for the prosecution.