Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

The dreaded grammar lesson

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1The dreaded grammar lesson Empty The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:04 pm

RealLindaL



OK folks, as promised (or threatened) somewhere in the Politics forum yesterday, here’s a gratis, unsolicited (and perhaps entirely unwanted) little English grammar lesson in the form of a quick and easy method for deciding which personal pronoun to use in a sentence.   Is it I or me, she or her, he or him, they or them?  Correct pronoun usage sometimes eludes even the best of us.

So I like to use a simple little trick of sorts.   I call it “taking out half of the equation.”  No, there’s not really an equation involved per se, but that’s what I like to call it.  So make up your own name for it if you prefer.

The best way to explain this little trick is to offer a few examples.  I’ll start with I vs. me, since so many of us seem to think that “I” sounds more…I don’t know, cultured and correct, I guess, when in fact it’s often used entirely incorrectly and just sounds dumb.  For instance, one might hear on a radio commercial:

This business was started by my father and I many years ago.

Sound good and classy to you?  Nope, it’s wrong.  Here’s how you know: just take out half of the equation by removing the father from the picture. That leaves:

This business was started by I many years ago.

Ugh - now it doesn’t sound so good, does it?  Obviously, the business was started by me (objective case of the pronoun), not by I (subjective case).   And here’s the thing: adding back the other half (the father) does NOT make using “I” any more correct here.   Thus, the correct sentence:

This business was started by my father and me many years ago.

Here’s another example, a little more blatantly obvious:

Her and I went to the store.


“I went” is correct, of course.  But take out that half of the equation (the “and I” part), and now you’re saying:

Her went to the store.

Wrong, of course, and, again, just adding back “and I” doesn’t make using “her” correct all of a sudden.  It wasn’t before, and it isn’t now.  The proper sentence is thus:

She and I went to the store.

Along those same lines, one all too often hears something like:

Me and my brother had a beer.


That, of course, brings up another rule of English, which is that it’s virtually always incorrect to put yourself first.   But should one say it this way?

My brother and me had a beer.


Nope, because “my brother had a beer” would be correct, but “me had a beer” would not.  So the correct sentence is:

My brother and I had a beer.


Let’s try just one more, using the pronouns as objects of a preposition such as “to,” and demonstrating the common error of mixing the cases – again, perhaps because one somehow considers “I” the classier-sounding pronoun, even when it’s wrong, to whit:

It all sounded fairly complicated to him and I.


Complicated to him, fine.  Complicated to I, not fine.  Complicated to me, good.   Correct sentence:

It all sounded fairly complicated to him and me.


Speaking of complicated, all this objective and subjective pronoun stuff can get more complex, such as when dealing with an entire parenthetical phrase as the object of the preposition, but that’s a lesson for another day (or maybe never, if you’re lucky).

Hope this helps someone, sometime, some way.  It works virtually every time.



Last edited by RealLindaL on 3/6/2017, 6:19 pm; edited 2 times in total

2The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:07 pm

Sal

Sal

Me already knew that.

3The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:15 pm

RealLindaL



Oops, forgot to add that anyone such as Sal who speaks perfect English (or thinks they do) should not bother reading this.

4The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:25 pm

Sal

Sal

RealLindaL wrote:Oops, forgot to add that anyone such as Sal who speaks perfect English (or thinks they do) should not bother reading this.

I grew up with an English teacher for a mother, so I write purdy good.

My personal pet peeve is with people who say, "I could care less".

If you could care less, then you obviously care some.

If you couldn't care less, then you care not at all.

5The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:29 pm

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

Sal wrote:
RealLindaL wrote:Oops, forgot to add that anyone such as Sal who speaks perfect English (or thinks they do) should not bother reading this.

I grew up with an English teacher for a mother, so I write purdy good.

My personal pet peeve is with people who say, "I could care less".

If you could care less, then you obviously care some.

If you couldn't care less, then you care not at all.


Me too Sal.

6The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:31 pm

Telstar

Telstar

I speek poirfect english and I and me bother reading this. Smile

At least it isn't completely lacking content or context. Carry on. Wink

7The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:32 pm

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

RealLindaL wrote:Oops, forgot to add that anyone such as Sal who speaks perfect English (or thinks they do) should not bother reading this.


Your mom taught you about linking verbs.

8The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/6/2017, 6:33 pm

Telstar

Telstar

Joanimaroni wrote:
Sal wrote:
RealLindaL wrote:Oops, forgot to add that anyone such as Sal who speaks perfect English (or thinks they do) should not bother reading this.

I grew up with an English teacher for a mother, so I write purdy good.

My personal pet peeve is with people who say, "I could care less".

If you could care less, then you obviously care some.

If you couldn't care less, then you care not at all.


Me too Sal.




I care a good sh*t less. Laughing

9The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/7/2017, 2:52 am

RealLindaL



Telstar wrote:At least it isn't completely lacking content or context. Carry on. Wink

lol!

10The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/7/2017, 2:53 am

RealLindaL



Joanimaroni wrote:
RealLindaL wrote:Oops, forgot to add that anyone such as Sal who speaks perfect English (or thinks they do) should not bother reading this.


Your mom taught you about linking verbs.

Huh??

11The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/7/2017, 2:54 am

RealLindaL



Glad y'all are having fun with this.   Smile

12The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/8/2017, 11:39 am

Guest


Guest

Fuggedabowedit

13The dreaded grammar lesson Empty Re: The dreaded grammar lesson 3/8/2017, 1:32 pm

RealLindaL



panhandler wrote:Fuggedabowedit

Soooo.....you're not interested in retaining the integrity of the English language? Wink Wink

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum