Just a heads up to the oldz ...
... bringing into question someone's sexuality with the intent at insult, really dates you.
No one under 50 cares.
Then you fail to understand my rationale. Markle looks like Ernst Rohm, he acts like Ernst Rohm, and the brownshirts were almost entirely lead by homosexuals who brutally attacked Jews in pre Nazi Germany. I do not think Markle posts on this forum independently. I believe he is a fascist and is either paid as a shill or is a participant in a fascist group. The success of the Nazi ideology began and ended with the brownshirts led by Ernst Rohm. In the historical context sexuality is not an insult but a historical fact that in mass homosexuals were drawn to the brown shirts until Hitler feared they may be planning a coup. Mr. Markle's sexual choices without the context of his fascism is irrelevant. However, his perverse and fascist posts in historical context are simply a reality of who he probably is. I find it funny that it was not until he chose to post his own picture bare chested with a shovel, that it became crystal clear who he was to me.
Hitler was hesitant in authorizing Röhm's execution, and gave him the option of suicide. On 1 July, SS-Brigadeführer Theodor Eicke (then Kommandant of the Dachau concentration camp) and SS-Obersturmbannführer Michael Lippert walked into his cell, laid a pistol on the table, told Röhm he had ten minutes to use it and left. He refused, stating, "If I am to be killed, let Adolf do it himself." Having heard nothing after the stipulated ten minutes, Eicke and Lippert returned to Röhm's cell to find him standing with his bare chest puffed out in a gesture of defiance, and Lippert shot him in the chest at point-blank range. The bullet hit Röhm in the heart, killing him almost instantly.[
That image is seared in my mind. You see fascism was successful because of Ernst Rohm and his homosexual brownshirts.
SA intimidation contributed to the rise of the Nazis and the violent suppression of right-wing parties during electoral campaigns, but its reputation for street violence and heavy drinking was a hindrance, as was the open homosexuality of Röhm and other SA leaders such as his deputy Edmund Heines. One American journalist later wrote, "[Röhm's] chiefs, men of the rank of Gruppenfuehrer or Obergruppenfuehrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals." In 1931, the Münchener Post, a Social Democratic [newspaper, obtained and published Röhm's letters to a friend discussing his homosexual affairs.
It is a reality that fascism has a particular profile. It is not a put down to call someone a homosexual. It does not matter, but if Mr. Markle wants to generalize that Muslims should be blamed for terrorism and then in search of facts to back it up, he uses historical reference, then my context of Markle being a fascist is absolutely correct, and my intuition is probably right.
In regard to referencing his father, I agreed not to reference the same when he asked me not to reference his father's heroic sacrifices at the battle of the bulge, but it was Mr. Markle who wrongfully introduces his father into the discussion to insinuate that folks do not get mental damage from war, and my point was yes they do, and they also make their families suffer and cause damage to their family. The shooter had multiple domestic violence calls and he was damaged goods. Mr. Markle is damaged goods and continues to spam this forum, and I make No apology in identifying a person who I do not know his name, and other than knowing he lives in Tally I am certain he has affiliations with fascist organizations and that his spam on this forum whether it is the bloodied body of Chris or other perversion confirms what I have outlined. Do we attack personally somebody on the forum. No. I do not know Mr Markle.......I only know a fascist.
Home
