So was it DNC leaks or The Russians?

http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/12/756739-wikileaks-operative-tells-radically-different-story-of-how-it-got-dnc-emails-inside-leaks-not-hacks/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=ods&utm_term=ijamerica&utm_content=politics



“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything,” Assange said. “Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false — we can say that the Russian government is not the source.”

It's all they have left... pathetic really.

http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

I agree with you. On the surface, it has appeared that Hillary Clinton is far more of a hawk than President Elect Donald Trump.

Yes, just like the United States, China, and every other country in the world, Russia is working diligently to access our secrets and we're working to access every other countries secrets. WOW!

Joani is getting as bad as Markle w/ the lies. What's with the Repugs and lies? They seem to go hand in hand.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/21/17-intelligence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is getting as bad as Markle w/ the lies. What's with the Repugs and lies? They seem to go hand in hand.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/21/17-intelligence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/

You would better serve your purpose by citing a CURRENT article.

Also, IF Lame Duck President Barack Hussein Obama knew about actual Russian interference in our election, WHY DID HE DO NOTHING AT THE TIME?

It's current enough and the White House has explained why.

The hacking just showed the dems what's behind the curtin of their own party. They didn't seem to mind that their ruling elite played dirty with bernie... or that they basically fixed the primary and played them for fools.

But now they care because that same leftist ruling elite promoted it as a talkingpoint. It's sad really.

The Russians weren't involved w/ Bernie. Big damn difference when a foe installs an American President.

It must be nice to be clueless. You didn't even understand my post... lol.

I understood what you said.

Vikingwoman wrote:The Russians weren't involved w/ Bernie. Big damn difference when a foe installs an American President.

That is the point!

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

knothead wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

So they hacked emails aND revealed scandals within the Hillary campaign. And the Russians did it...even though Wiki links claims the information came from Whistle blowers within the democrat party. Actually, given the fact Sanders was sabotaged ,  and inside leak makes more sense.

Of course if you are gullible enough to see a Russian under ever bed....it must be true

Joanimaroni wrote:

knothead wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

So they hacked emails aND revealed scandals within the Hillary campaign. And the Russians did it...even though Wiki links claims the information came from Whistle blowers within the democrat party. Actually, given the fact Sanders was sabotaged ,  and inside leak makes more sense.

Of course if you are gullible enough to see a Russian under ever bed....it must be true

Pull your own head out of the sand and open your eyes . . .

The Russians have billions of dollars in oil deals on the line which wasn't happening w/ Hillary. Why do you think Tillerson was given Sec. of State?

Joanimaroni wrote:

knothead wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

So they hacked emails aND revealed scandals within the Hillary campaign. And the Russians did it...even though Wiki links claims the information came from Whistle blowers within the democrat party. Actually, given the fact Sanders was sabotaged ,  and inside leak makes more sense.

Of course if you are gullible enough to see a Russian under ever bed....it must be true

Good God woman! The CIA has confirmed it. 17 damn intelligence agencies! Are you that moronic?

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

knothead wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

So they hacked emails aND revealed scandals within the Hillary campaign. And the Russians did it...even though Wiki links claims the information came from Whistle blowers within the democrat party. Actually, given the fact Sanders was sabotaged ,  and inside leak makes more sense.

Of course if you are gullible enough to see a Russian under ever bed....it must be true

Good God woman! The CIA has confirmed it. 17 damn intelligence agencies! Are you that moronic?

The ones who leaked it denied Russian involvement. How sure are you it wasn't a whistle blower within the campaign?    ..perhaps some where within the Democratic party you have an honest individual that disagreed with Hillary's corruption.

Sooo... exposing corruption in the democratic party swayed the election. Gotcha.

WTH are you even talking about?Those emails were altered and intended to interfere. You're ok w/ that since it's the Dems but if it were the repugs you'd be screaming bloody murder.

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

knothead wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

So they hacked emails aND revealed scandals within the Hillary campaign. And the Russians did it...even though Wiki links claims the information came from Whistle blowers within the democrat party. Actually, given the fact Sanders was sabotaged ,  and inside leak makes more sense.

Of course if you are gullible enough to see a Russian under ever bed....it must be true

Good God woman! The CIA has confirmed it. 17 damn intelligence agencies! Are you that moronic?

The ones who leaked it denied Russian involvement. How sure are you it wasn't a whistle blower within the campaign?    ..perhaps some where within the Democratic party you have an honest individual that disagreed with Hillary's corruption.

Of course they denied Russian involvement! They wanted to appear legit. How sure am I? Jeez ask the 17 agencies that said that-not me. Believe it or not, I don't have access to intelligence.

Vikingwoman wrote:The Russians weren't involved w/ Bernie. Big damn difference when a foe installs an American President.

Yeah...the foe was the DNC and they corrupted the playing field in favor of a deeply flawed candidate.

Speaking of LIES, please show us the source and link to the site you claim makes any allegation, whatsoever, that Russia changed the outcome of the election.

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

knothead wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:http://imp.bid.ace.advertising.com/click/site=929470/mnum=2485255/cstr=77252772=_5853237a_5060697809_929470*2485255*1244*0_1_/xsxdata=$xsxdata/imptid=AS411623c198564482a510fbf11de27f3a/bnum=77252772/optn=64?trg=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/29817-226924-40814-1?mpt=5060697809&mpcr=101073385&mpcrset=root?198,188


Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary.....doesn't make any sense.

Putin has had a beef with HRC since 2011 when she publicly excoriated the so-called "elections" in Russia which everyone know is a sham so yes he evidently captured the opportunity to get in our sand box to sway the election to P.T. Barnum . . .

So they hacked emails aND revealed scandals within the Hillary campaign. And the Russians did it...even though Wiki links claims the information came from Whistle blowers within the democrat party. Actually, given the fact Sanders was sabotaged , and inside leak makes more sense.

Of course if you are gullible enough to see a Russian under ever bed....it must be true

Good God woman! The CIA has confirmed it. 17 damn intelligence agencies! Are you that moronic?

The ones who leaked it denied Russian involvement. How sure are you it wasn't a whistle blower within the campaign? ..perhaps some where within the Democratic party you have an honest individual that disagreed with Hillary's corruption.

Of course they denied Russian involvement! They wanted to appear legit. How sure am I? Jeez ask the 17 agencies that said that-not me. Believe it or not, I don't have access to intelligence.

We believe it but I'm at a loss why you would boast about the fact.

Do you deny, (no Democrat does) that all the emails were factual and not altered?

So the whole thing goes back to the fact that the Clinton Cabal intentionally installed an illegal, hidden private server for the sole purpose of concealing the nefarious behavior.

Please show us your source and the link where our 17 intelligence agencies said that it was Russia who made all those real emails available.

Why are you complaining that voters had more factual information upon which to make their decision?

Markle wrote:Why are you complaining that voters had more factual information upon which to make their decision?

Oh puhleez, spare us the spanking clean, holier-than-thou act. Even IF the emails were all legit, not altered -- and I'm not saying they were or weren't -- you know perfectly well they constituted private correspondence that should never have been revealed, and you know further that similar or (more likely) even worse "dirt" would've almost certainly been revealed had someone hacked/breached the privacy of the RNC and/or other Republican campaign players' emails, and THEN wouldn't we have heard you and Trump and all his supporters crying foul from here to eternity. Oh yes, we would've.

Vikingwoman wrote:WTH are you even talking about?Those emails were altered and intended to interfere. You're ok w/ that since it's the Dems but if it were the repugs you'd be screaming bloody murder.

Your increasing desperation is duly noted. You may want to consider seeing your doctor about your high blood pressure.

As you know, EVEN the Democrats did not claim the emails are anything but the truth.

Care to try anything else?