Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Russians suggest if Hillary is elected there may be nuclear war

Russians suggest if Hillary is elected there may be nuclear war

+3
ZVUGKTUBM
dumpcare
2seaoat
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

2seaoat



http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/putin-ally-tells-americans-vote-trump-or-face-nuclear-war/ar-AAiROc2?li=BBnb7Kz


This is not a joke. Trump is dangerous at so many levels, but the idea the propagandist are trying to create the illusion that the United States and our government must be toppled. Nuclear threats as the election gets closer and the Russians are posting more hacked emails.......this is the most dangerous time in fifty years in America. Pence knows that Trump threw him under the bus for telling the truth about Russia......yet like a lap dog, he becomes a traitor to America.

dumpcare



That was the number 1 reason I did not vote for Trump, crazy man.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

This is all about controlling the flow and production of oil from the Eurasian landmass. The Western international bankers("banksters") know that oil sales provide the Russian government with a significant portiuon of its revenue. They know that by putting a potential chokehold on Russian oil exports and by whipsawing the price per barrel, they can have Russia by the balls.

Why does the U.S. need to threaten Russia by surrounding it with new allies from former Soviet satellites and by building a ring of U.S. bases even closer to the borders of Russia than they were before?

The "missile shield" built in Eastern Europe to deter the non-existent threat from Iran can also be used against Russia. Russia has vowed to strike that base immediately if any hostilities arise between the U.S. and Russia.

We faced the Soviet Bear for 47 years after WWI in a tense Cold War. We have no business meddling in the affairs of former republics that were a part of the former USSR.

It would be so easy to just get along with a much less-fierce Russia. The U.S. need not engage in provocative moves just outside the Russian border. Would we ever accept a Russian military presence in Canada? That is how close we are now to the Russians.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

[...]


How are members of NATO, on the border of Russia a problem among peaceful nations?

How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

In the past two days, Iran-backed forces have FIRED FOUR MISSILES at American destroyers. According to you, that is impossible. Then how did it happen?

2seaoat



Knowing many Lithuanians who are migrating to America in mass, to the last one they fear the Russians will enslave them again. They were forced to take Russian in their schools under the soviets........freedom has been good, and they love America. It has nothing to do with oil. They are legitimately scared of Russian aggression.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

Please show us and provide links proving that Iran has threatened to attack NATO members!

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

Please show us and provide links proving that Iran has threatened to attack NATO members!

Do you ignore all real news intentionally or is it just a habit?
BY LAZAR BERMAN February 10, 2014, 1:53 am
Iran escalates military threats against United States IRGC

Navy commander warns that country can sink US aircraft carriers, while defense minister promises response to military attack

spite the signing of a landmark nuclear deal in November with the P5+1 world powers, and a moderate tone coming from President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif, Iranian defense officials escalated sharply their rhetoric against the United States over the weekend.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-escalates-threats-against-united-states/

2seaoat



Escalated words.......wow. Scardy cat time.

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

Please show us and provide links proving that Iran has threatened to attack NATO members!

We are a NATO member, nuf said idiot.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Escalated words.......wow.   Scardy cat time.

Whatever old man. You've never been in harm's way. Your kids and grandkids might though one day...when a draft is needed to flush out the military for an upcoming war.

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

This is all about controlling the flow and production of oil from the Eurasian landmass. The Western international bankers("banksters") know that oil sales provide the Russian government with a significant portiuon of its revenue. They know that by putting a potential chokehold on Russian oil exports and by whipsawing the price per barrel, they can have Russia by the balls.

Why does the U.S. need to threaten Russia by surrounding it with new allies from former Soviet satellites and by building a ring of U.S. bases even closer to the borders of Russia than they were before?

The "missile shield" built in Eastern Europe to deter the non-existent threat from Iran can also be used against Russia. Russia has vowed to strike that base immediately if any hostilities arise between the U.S. and Russia.

We faced the Soviet Bear for 47 years after WWI in a tense Cold War. We have no business meddling in the affairs of former republics that were a part of the former USSR.

It would be so easy to just get along with a much less-fierce Russia. The U.S. need not engage in provocative moves just outside the Russian border. Would we ever accept a Russian military presence in Canada? That is how close we are now to the Russians.

hey idiot, NATO was initially pushed up to the border of Russia by William Jefferson Clinton long ago. BUsh and Obama continued the policy, but it is wholly owned by Slick willie. Here is a link to prove it moron.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/how_we_entered_cold_war_ii.html

2seaoat



Whatever old man. You've never been in harm's way. Your kids and grandkids might though one day...when a draft is needed to flush out the military for an upcoming war.


Being in harm's way is not a hall pass to be stupid. I am all for a Military draft because a mercenary military is killing civilians and America sits at home comfortably while poor kids become part of the mercenary army while 99% of America sit insulated from the horrors we are bestowing on innocent civilians under the guise of fighting terrorism as hundreds of thousands of innocents died in the invasion of a nation which had nothing to do with terrorism in America. Yes please......restore the Military draft. I was part of the same military draft, and remained 1a while somebody else had bone spurs before the draft, and then suddenly was ok when he got a high draft number......the draft worked and in my opinion we got better military when we had citizens....not mercenaries. I understand the military wants kids who have no options and reup because that is all they have, and drafted folks have options and get the hell out as soon as they can.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

[...]


How are members of NATO, on the border of Russia a problem among peaceful nations?

How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

In the past two days, Iran-backed forces have FIRED FOUR MISSILES at American destroyers.  According to you, that is impossible.  Then how did it happen?


Figure it out Meathead. Yesterday you were warning us all of the threat of Russia installing missiles in Syria at their Naval base. In other words, it's okay by you for us to put missiles on the Russian border, but it's terrible if Russia tries to do the same. I remember this same sort of crapola back in 1963 when the Cuban Missile Crisis took place. Face it Booby, Hillary is ten times the hawk that the guy with the dead rat on his head claims to be.  And Russia is in deep financial trouble; of course Putin would like to see Trump win.  And it's clear he's afraid of Hillary.  If Russia starts a nuclear war, Russia will burn the same way the U.S. burns.  We've been through this atomic war bullshit before.  I remember the cold war, even if most of you don't.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/us-missile-defense/missile-defense-timeline#.WADiXeArLIU

Edumacate yourself.

Telstar

Telstar

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

[...]


How are members of NATO, on the border of Russia a problem among peaceful nations?

How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

In the past two days, Iran-backed forces have FIRED FOUR MISSILES at American destroyers.  According to you, that is impossible.  Then how did it happen?


Figure it out Meathead.  Yesterday you were warning us all of the threat of Russia installing missiles in Syria at their Naval base.  In other words, it's okay by you for us to put missiles on the Russian border, but it's terrible if Russia tries to do the same.  I remember this same sort of crapola back in 1963 when the Cuban Missile Crisis took place.  Face it Booby, Hillary is ten times the hawk that the guy with the dead rat on his head claims to be.  And Russia is in deep financial trouble; of course Putin would like to see Trump win.  And it's clear he's afraid of Hillary.  If Russia starts a nuclear war, Russia will burn the same way the U.S. burns.  We've been through this atomic war bullshit before.  I remember the cold war, even if most of you don't.


Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

[...]


How are members of NATO, on the border of Russia a problem among peaceful nations?

How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

In the past two days, Iran-backed forces have FIRED FOUR MISSILES at American destroyers.  According to you, that is impossible.  Then how did it happen?


Figure it out Meathead.  Yesterday you were warning us all of the threat of Russia installing missiles in Syria at their Naval base.  In other words, it's okay by you for us to put missiles on the Russian border, but it's terrible if Russia tries to do the same.  I remember this same sort of crapola back in 1963 when the Cuban Missile Crisis took place.  Face it Booby, Hillary is ten times the hawk that the guy with the dead rat on his head claims to be.  And Russia is in deep financial trouble; of course Putin would like to see Trump win.  And it's clear he's afraid of Hillary.  If Russia starts a nuclear war, Russia will burn the same way the U.S. burns.  We've been through this atomic war bullshit before.  I remember the cold war, even if most of you don't.

Russians suggest if Hillary is elected there may be nuclear war 5a86c1ec-a5ca-4dcd-82b1-2fb247a229c9_zpsa2jhm6th

Ours are defensive missiles, Russia is installing offensive missiles.

What does the Cuban Missile Crisis (I lived in Miami at the time) and the Cold War have to do with our bungling Syria?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Our problem is that both Bush43 and Obama have pursued the expansion of NATO right up to Russia's border, and we have installed missile shields in Eastern Europe, claiming they are meant for the non-existent missile threat from Iran, when these ABMs can also be used against Russian ICBMs.

[...]


How are members of NATO, on the border of Russia a problem among peaceful nations?

How can you say that IRAN is a non-existent threat of launching missiles against NATO members when Iran is testing mid-range missiles?

In the past two days, Iran-backed forces have FIRED FOUR MISSILES at American destroyers.  According to you, that is impossible.  Then how did it happen?


Figure it out Meathead.  Yesterday you were warning us all of the threat of Russia installing missiles in Syria at their Naval base.  In other words, it's okay by you for us to put missiles on the Russian border, but it's terrible if Russia tries to do the same.  I remember this same sort of crapola back in 1963 when the Cuban Missile Crisis took place.  Face it Booby, Hillary is ten times the hawk that the guy with the dead rat on his head claims to be.  And Russia is in deep financial trouble; of course Putin would like to see Trump win.  And it's clear he's afraid of Hillary.  If Russia starts a nuclear war, Russia will burn the same way the U.S. burns.  We've been through this atomic war bullshit before.  I remember the cold war, even if most of you don't.

Russians suggest if Hillary is elected there may be nuclear war 5a86c1ec-a5ca-4dcd-82b1-2fb247a229c9_zpsa2jhm6th

Ours are defensive missiles, Russia is installing offensive missiles.

What does the Cuban Missile Crisis (I lived in Miami at the time) and the Cold War have to do with our bungling Syria?


Offensive or defensive ... at this point, what difference does it make? Both of us have enough intercontinental ballistic missiles to destroy life on the earth a hundred times over. Russia installing missiles in Syria is no more threat than installing them in submarines, which they and we do. You lose booby. What's it like?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Russians suggest if Hillary is elected there may be nuclear war

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum