Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

FBI Director: I Never Said Hillary Was ‘Truthful’ About Her Email Scandal DEBUNKS HILLARY! AGAIN!

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

FBI Director Comey DEBUNKS HILLARY'S LIES about being TRUTHFUL ABOUT HER EMAILS.  I am shocked...SHOCKED I SAY!

FBI Director: I Never Said Hillary Was ‘Truthful’ About Her Email Scandal

by PATRICK HOWLEY28 Sep 201670
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

FBI director James Comey debunked Hillary Clinton’s claim that Comey called her “truthful” about her private email scandal.

“I did not,” Comey confirmed Wednesday at a U.S. House hearing, making it clear that Clinton was not being truthful when she made her comment about Comey calling her “truthful.”


[...]

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/28/fbi-director-never-said-hillary-truthful-email-scandal/

Video at this site if from C-Span so if you have any argument with the source, that it up with C-Span and tell them they're lying.

Otherwise, grow up.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/28/fbi-director-never-said-hillary-truthful-email-scandal/

FBI Director: I Never Said Hillary Was ‘Truthful’ About Her Email Scandal    DEBUNKS HILLARY!  AGAIN! Zombie

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/28/fbi-director-never-said-hillary-truthful-email-scandal/

FBI Director: I Never Said Hillary Was ‘Truthful’ About Her Email Scandal    DEBUNKS HILLARY!  AGAIN! Bie

I repeat!

Video at this site if from C-Span so if you have any argument with the source, then take it up with C-Span and tell them they're lying.

Otherwise, grow up.[/quote]

polecat

polecat

Can you tell us about all the top secret documents that got out?


Guest


Guest

polecat wrote:Can you tell us about all the top secret documents that got out?



Classified info was transferred multiple times to two tech companies... that did not have security clearance. There was a laptop and a zip drive lost that contained her emails. Numerous times hillary carried and used her devises into areas that they were forbidden... like in hostile foreign nations and unsecured or restricted areas. Cheryl Mills received immunity because she had classified info on her laptop. Some 20 people at some point had access to her servers... many with inadequate or NO security clearance. You can't be anymore grossly negligent without just handing out national secrets directly.

Guest


Guest

Btw... she and her lackeys aren't the only liars in this case. Obama said he learned of the server on the news... but in fact had created a pseudonym to contact his secretary of state... which all by itself makes it both a public record and classified. They're either morons, cavalier, or corrupt. All disqualifiers imo.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Comey is playing politics, all right. He should have made a one-minute statement that the FBI investigation produced no evidence to press charges against Secretary Clinton. Instead, he publicly chastised her, allowing the witch hunts to continue. It was political...just not in the way that the GOP publicly acknowledges...he left the door open for criticism.

The Bush administration used an RNC server...22 million emails went missing, and when recovered, went straight to the archives. And we can't know what's in them. How is this in any way equitable?

Guest


Guest

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2003/06/05/business/prosecuting-martha-stewart-overview-martha-stewart-indicted-us-obstruction.html

At a news conference announcing the charges against Martha Stewart, James B. Comey, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, said, ''This criminal case is about lying -- lying to the F.B.I., lying to the S.E.C., lying to investors.'' Addressing a question that has long hovered over the investigation, he added, ''Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not for who she is, but because of what she did.''

polecat

polecat

PkrBum wrote:
polecat wrote:Can you tell us about all the top secret documents that got out?



Classified info was transferred multiple times to two tech companies... that did not have security clearance. There was a laptop and a zip drive lost that contained her emails. Numerous times hillary carried and used her devises into areas that they were forbidden... like in hostile foreign nations and unsecured or restricted areas. Cheryl Mills received immunity because she had classified info on her laptop. Some 20 people at some point had access to her servers... many with inadequate or NO security clearance. You can't be anymore grossly negligent without just handing out national secrets directly.


And what ''NATIONAL SECRETS'' got out.

Guest


Guest

polecat wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
polecat wrote:Can you tell us about all the top secret documents that got out?



Classified info was transferred multiple times to two tech companies... that did not have security clearance. There was a laptop and a zip drive lost that contained her emails. Numerous times hillary carried and used her devises into areas that they were forbidden... like in hostile foreign nations and unsecured or restricted areas. Cheryl Mills received immunity because she had classified info on her laptop. Some 20 people at some point had access to her servers... many with inadequate or NO security clearance. You can't be anymore grossly negligent without just handing out national secrets directly.


And what ''NATIONAL SECRETS'' got out.

Is that the legal standard? Is that what passes for national security with you?

She was either stupid or corrupt. Only a looney lefty can rationalize anything else.

gatorfan



PkrBum wrote:
polecat wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
polecat wrote:Can you tell us about all the top secret documents that got out?



Classified info was transferred multiple times to two tech companies... that did not have security clearance. There was a laptop and a zip drive lost that contained her emails. Numerous times hillary carried and used her devises into areas that they were forbidden... like in hostile foreign nations and unsecured or restricted areas. Cheryl Mills received immunity because she had classified info on her laptop. Some 20 people at some point had access to her servers... many with inadequate or NO security clearance. You can't be anymore grossly negligent without just handing out national secrets directly.


And what ''NATIONAL SECRETS'' got out.

Is that the legal standard? Is that what passes for national security with you?

She was either stupid or corrupt. Only a looney lefty can rationalize anything else.

The apologists choose to ignore reality, documents are "classified" because exposure could cause harm to the interests of the U.S.

"Classified national security information is information created or received by an agency of the federal government or a government contractor that would damage national security if improperly released. Since 1940, the President has managed the system of classifying information by executive order (E.O.); the most recent order concerning classified national security information is E.O. 13526, signed by President Obama on December 29, 2009."

There is no doubt HRCs improper handling of many classified documents and her BS server methods exposed them to improper release. Only a really ignorant fool could deny that simple fact.

Markle

Markle

polecat wrote:Can you tell us about all the top secret documents that got out?


They were released by WikiLeaks.

They didn't tell you that on the DailyKOS or HuffingtonPost?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum