Breaking: Hillary Clinton Cancels Fundraiser in North Carolina with No Explanation

Hillary Clinton has cancelled most of her rallies but FUNDRAISERS? NEVER! Until today, why?

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Cancels Fundraiser in North Carolina with No Explanation

Jim Hoft Sep 20th, 2016

Hillary Clinton canceled her appearance tonight at a fundraiser in North Carolina.

No reason was given for the postponement of the Clinton event.
Zero Hedge reported:

If there was a time Hillary needed to make a public appearance in the key battleground state of North Carolina to drum up voter support, it was today, if for no other reason than a just released Elon University poll finding Trump now has a modest 44% advantage among likely voters in the Tar Heel State, with 43% going to Clinton.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/breaking-hillary-clinton-cancels-fundraiser-north-carolina-no-explanation/

With Trump Regaining North Carolina Lead, Hillary Unexpectedly Postpones Local Fundraiser "Without Reason"

Tyler Durden's picture
by Tyler Durden
Sep 20, 2016 4:55 PM

If there was a time Hillary needed to make a public appearance in the key battleground state of North Carolina to drum up voter support, it was today, if for no other reason than a just released Elon University poll finding Trump now has a modest 44% advantage among likely voters in the Tar Heel State, with 43% going to Clinton.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-20/trump-regaining-north-carolina-lead-hillary-unexpectedly-postpones-local-fundraiser-

To my whiney Progressive good friends. True or false?

The reason is she is being coached on the 8 violations of the law using other people's money in the Trump Foundation to pay personal obligations or bribe public officials. She will be able to inform the huge viewing audience about the specifics of this crime. She is going to be that crooked Hillary Clinton helping folks with Aids......while reciting how Trump has broke the law.....more is breaking each day, and she has to absorb this information and deliver it......while you think she is not making the campaign stops because of illness......too funny.......even a woman as brilliant as Hillary is going to have a whole lot of Trump specific corruption to load up on before the debate when America will be watching Donald Trump squirm and lie.....fact check.....and bubba is going to get this......Donald Trump is a fraud.

Or... the debate is running late.  The talking heads fill ten minutes... twenty minutes... finally they begin to wonder... at thirty minutes they speculate. At forty five minutes the hillary campaign proffers some odd ball lame ass excuse that NO one believes (except you)... like she accidentally locked herself in the can.

It's as likely as your tingle up your leg wet dream... lol.

The folks at Fox News are not talking about Donald Trump the Sociopath who has broken the law. In the debate it will be discussed. People will have to make a moral choice. Something you avoid.

Sooo... now you're concerned with the law? Lol... what a dupe.

Sooo... now you're concerned with the law? Lol... what a dupe.

I was always concerned with the law. Its just I understand and read. You post a standard of gross negligence alleging the FBI f'd up when I had to explain the Supreme Court case which said that statute is unconstitutional without an intent requirement......you just regurgitate propaganda......my job here is to explain. Let me explain. Hillary Clinton after record levels of committee time and FBI investigation was found to have not broken the law. Donald Trump will be indicted. Do you see anybody else here saying that? I will explain. One use of charitable trust could be a mistake. Multiple uses of the same is a scheme and a criminal conspiracy. Donald Trump will be found guilty. The art of the deal as he bribes Texas and Florida officials with other people's money. Your boy is a criminal sociopath.

You can't even keep up with my position on trump... lol. There's NO doubt that Hillary failed to guard and protect the correspondence of the SOS. She routed sensitive information to a private, unauthorized, and unsecure server in her home basement. She had techs work on the server that had no clearance to do such work... she had that information transferred to at least two tech companies that had no security clearance. That's clear intent to expose this info to unclassified people... share/transfer the classified info to places it did not belong... and then destroy the classified info in direct violation of both subpoena and law.

You play dumb all you want... it's a quasi free country. But you fool no one with any common sense.

——
18 U.S. Code § 793 — Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information …

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —

Shall be fined not more than $10, 000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy, shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

(a) Destruction or Removal of Property To Prevent Seizure

Whoever, before, during, or after any search for or seizure of property by any person authorized to make such search or seizure, knowingly destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of preventing or impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody or control or to continue holding such property under its lawful custody and control, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Impairment of In Rem Jurisdiction

Whoever, knowing that property is subject to the in rem jurisdiction of a United States court for purposes of civil forfeiture under Federal law, knowingly and without authority from that court, destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of impairing or defeating the court’s continuing in rem jurisdiction over the property, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

From now on, instead of calling the Trump Foundation “a charity”, can we call it “a Kickstarter for Trump’s legal bills”? - Erik Bransteen

I can think of a great reason for her cancellation. Her fundraiser was in Chapel Hill, but the airport is in Charlotte, which has become a powder key since the police shooting of Keith Lamont Scott.

http://www.salon.com/2016/09/21/charlotte-erupts-with-protests-after-police-kill-disabled-black-man-family-says-was-reading-book-in-car/?source=newsletter

***************


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge


"...The website was established in 2009.[3] According to the Boston Business Journal, the website "publishes financial news and opinion, aggregated and original" from a number of writers "who purportedly hail from within the financial industry."[3] Posts on the website are signed "Tyler Durden," a character in the Chuck Palahniuk book and movie Fight Club.[3][4]

In 2009, shortly after the blog was founded, news reports identified Daniel Ivandjiiski, a Bulgarian-born former hedge-fund analyst who was barred from the industry for insider trading by FINRA in 2008, as the founder of the site, and reported that "Durden" was a pseudonym for Ivandjiiski.[4][5][6][1] One contributor, who spoke to New York magazine after an interview was arranged by Ivandjiiski, said that "up to 40" people were permitted to post under the "Durden" name.[4]

In April 2016, the authors writing as "Durden" on the website were reported by Bloomberg News to be Ivandjiiski, Tim Backshall (a credit derivatives strategist), and Colin Lokey. Lokey, the newest member revealed himself and the other two when he left the site.[1] Ivandjiiski confirmed that the three men "had been the only Tyler Durdens on the payroll" since Lokey joined the site in 2015.[1] On leaving, Lokey said: "I can't be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It's wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run. This isn't a revolution. It's a joke."[1]..."

***********

Zero Hedge has no credibility.

Floridatexan wrote:
I can think of a great reason for her cancellation.  Her fundraiser was in Chapel Hill, but the airport is in Charlotte, which has become a powder key since the police shooting of Keith Lamont Scott.  

http://www.salon.com/2016/09/21/charlotte-erupts-with-protests-after-police-kill-disabled-black-man-family-says-was-reading-book-in-car/?source=newsletter

Makes perfect sense, FT. And, if it's true, one can just imagine the sarcastic comments had that reason been given.

No reason was given for the cancellation.