Markle wrote:It appears that rightfully so, the Trump campaign is raising money selling "T" shirt emblazoned with "I'm the DEPLORABLE".
It's good they are self-identifying so decent folk can keep their distance.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Markle wrote:It appears that rightfully so, the Trump campaign is raising money selling "T" shirt emblazoned with "I'm the DEPLORABLE".
Sal wrote:Markle wrote:It appears that rightfully so, the Trump campaign is raising money selling "T" shirt emblazoned with "I'm the DEPLORABLE".
It's good they are self-identifying so decent folk can keep their distance.
Markle wrote:"DEPLORABLE" comment becomes Hillary Clinton's "47% Mitt Romney" comment and will be an albatross around her neck.
Hillary Clinton dug a deeper hole for herself when she said this about AMERICANS!
RealLindaL wrote:Sal wrote:Markle wrote:It appears that rightfully so, the Trump campaign is raising money selling "T" shirt emblazoned with "I'm the DEPLORABLE".
It's good they are self-identifying so decent folk can keep their distance.
Joanimaroni wrote:RealLindaL wrote:Sal wrote:Markle wrote:It appears that rightfully so, the Trump campaign is raising money selling "T" shirt emblazoned with "I'm the DEPLORABLE".
It's good they are self-identifying so decent folk can keep their distance.
I am a republican!
Joanimaroni wrote:RealLindaL wrote:Sal wrote:Markle wrote:It appears that rightfully so, the Trump campaign is raising money selling "T" shirt emblazoned with "I'm the DEPLORABLE".
It's good they are self-identifying so decent folk can keep their distance.
I am a republican!
Telstar wrote:Think I'll just put this here.
PkrBum wrote:“We want Hillary Clinton to win. She is telling everybody one thing, but she has a hidden agenda. She’s telling everybody what they want to hear so she can get elected, because she’s Bill Clinton’s wife, she’s close to the Bushes. [But] once she’s in the presidency, she’s going to come out and her true colours are going to show." California KKK Grand Dragon
PkrBum wrote:Both candidates rejected the endorsements. But what is the predominate and driving narrative?
RealLindaL wrote:PkrBum wrote:Both candidates rejected the endorsements. But what is the predominate and driving narrative?
What the heck kind of question is that? If you want an answer, be specific. If it's rhetorical, go ahead and answer it yourself.
PkrBum wrote:RealLindaL wrote:PkrBum wrote:Both candidates rejected the endorsements. But what is the predominate and driving narrative?
What the heck kind of question is that? If you want an answer, be specific. If it's rhetorical, go ahead and answer it yourself.
The driving narrative is that Trump is bigoted and so are at least half of those that will vote for him.
So we'll try a simpler question. Do you think that to be true? And if so... based on what facts?
2seaoat wrote:When PK gets in the privacy of the voting booth......he will vote for Trump. He will. He will tell us that Hillary is bad and he will not vote for Trump, but will never tell the truth......he is a closet Trump supporter........he is a closet David Duke supporter...........our words attach and do have meaning.
Markle wrote:SheWrites wrote:On another note...
What Hillary said is true. What other party but the Republican party offers space to those who live out the phobias she listed? Is it deplorable? You decide.
Good, keep on calling your fellow Americans: “You know, just to be grossly generalist, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it."
LOTS of good things will come of that tactic. Even Hillary Clinton is trying to reel this one back in but it is her "47 percent" comment now, an Albatross around her neck.
Keep up the good work SheWrites!
Sal wrote:There is no Clinton slush fund.
They have a charity which has performed countless good works and saved thousands of lives.
There is no evidence of any quid pro quo between Clinton and Wall St - just the opposite in fact.
Even Bernie Sanders was forced to acknowledge this fact in one of the Democratic primary debates.
Why do you have to rely on false narratives?
PkrBum wrote:I wonder why such a bad candidate has a chance?
Sal wrote:PkrBum wrote:I wonder why such a bad candidate has a chance?
Polecat's cartoon summed that up nicely.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|