http://www.infoplease.com/world/statistics/life-expectancy-country.html
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Bob wrote:http://www.infoplease.com/world/statistics/life-expectancy-country.html
ppaca wrote:So Bob posts a link and he's ignorant? You know erkle you are the first one to call someone out when they call you a name in a post, but post a link and they are ignorant?
There truly is something wrong with you.
knothead wrote:ppaca wrote:So Bob posts a link and he's ignorant? You know erkle you are the first one to call someone out when they call you a name in a post, but post a link and they are ignorant?
There truly is something wrong with you.
Ya think . . . . . . .!!!!!!
ppaca wrote:So Bob posts a link and he's ignorant? You know erkle you are the first one to call someone out when they call you a name in a post, but post a link and they are ignorant?
There truly is something wrong with you.
Markle wrote:ppaca wrote:So Bob posts a link and he's ignorant? You know erkle you are the first one to call someone out when they call you a name in a post, but post a link and they are ignorant?
There truly is something wrong with you.
Yes, anyone who throws up a post, copying someone else's and have no reason other than to clutter the forum, and not knowing a thing about the topic...shows ignorance.
My guess is that you have no knowledge as to why the thread and the headline is intentionally so grossly misleading either.
This is simply a tool to remove relevant issues from the top subjects.
Bob wrote:Obviously we're 43rd because of Obama, markle. Have you gone soft on Obama?
If we can only get a republican in the white house our life expectancy will go back to number 1 again.
Bob wrote:Obviously we're 43rd because of Obama, markle. Have you gone soft on Obama?
If we can only get a republican in the white house our life expectancy will go back to number 1 again.
ppaca wrote:Bob wrote:Obviously we're 43rd because of Obama, markle. Have you gone soft on Obama?
If we can only get a republican in the white house our life expectancy will go back to number 1 again.
He's gone soft period.
Markle wrote:ppaca wrote:Bob wrote:Obviously we're 43rd because of Obama, markle. Have you gone soft on Obama?
If we can only get a republican in the white house our life expectancy will go back to number 1 again.
He's gone soft period.
ppaca wrote:Markle wrote:ppaca wrote:So Bob posts a link and he's ignorant? You know erkle you are the first one to call someone out when they call you a name in a post, but post a link and they are ignorant?
There truly is something wrong with you.
Yes, anyone who throws up a post, copying someone else's and have no reason other than to clutter the forum, and not knowing a thing about the topic...shows ignorance.
My guess is that you have no knowledge as to why the thread and the headline is intentionally so grossly misleading either.
This is simply a tool to remove relevant issues from the top subjects.
Well then if that is the case I find no revelance in 99% of your posts, just wasted time while you suck on a werther's.
Markle wrote:Bob wrote:Obviously we're 43rd because of Obama, markle. Have you gone soft on Obama?
If we can only get a republican in the white house our life expectancy will go back to number 1 again.
You really know nothing about this topic do you?
Bob wrote:Markle wrote:Bob wrote:Obviously we're 43rd because of Obama, markle. Have you gone soft on Obama?
If we can only get a republican in the white house our life expectancy will go back to number 1 again.
You really know nothing about this topic do you?
Next week I'll be taking a drug that costs about $150,000. And following that I'll be taking another different drug that also costs about $150,000.
Two weeks ago they cut out part of my lung.
So if you're the expert, when do you have surgery and when do you start taking the hundred thousand dollar drugs?
2seaoat wrote:Unlike Mr. Markle thinking he understands this subject.....I do.....the stats speak loudly that many nations have greater life expectancy than Americans, and if you drill down on this site, you will see nations like China and developing countries have made tremendous strides in improving life expectancy of their citizens..........look at what the life expectancy was for a chinese baby at birth in 1960......look at what it was in America.........sometimes the stats speak clearly and do not need a translator who thinks he understands.
http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/country-health-profile/china
Markle wrote:
I am truly sorry about your having cancer and the issues that go along with the diagnosis. Like it or not, I have kept you and your loved ones in my prayers daily.
2seaoat wrote:I fail to understand what the life expectancy TODAY has to do with that in China 60 years ago.
Relevancy requires comprehension, and comprehension requires the ability to understand the life expectancy stats.......you clearly are having trouble with comprehension and the context of those stats. However, again.......the stats speak for themselves and so does the context where developing nations have made great strides in improving their health care where America in context has stumbled in our health care and your one little idea of the plurality of nationalities in America is quaint, but not relevant and certainly does nothing to change our standing in the world in regard to life expectancy.
Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Follow up to Wordslinger's thread: THE UNITED STATES NOW RANKS 43RD IN LIFE EXPECTANCY
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|