Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

obama the muslim and his muslim brotherhood is trying to kill romneys wife to keep him out of the election

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/ann-romneys-plane-makes-emergency-landing/

LAS VEGAS – Ann Romney’s plane made an emergency landing today in Colorado after smoke filled the cabin because of an apparent electrical fire.

Guest


Guest

Oh come on Chrissy. That is a bit far fetched even for you. If they had really wanted her dead it certainly would not be an electrical fire aboard an aircraft, more that likely it would have been a big BOOM instead of smoke.

Guest


Guest

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:Oh come on Chrissy. That is a bit far fetched even for you. If they had really wanted her dead it certainly would not be an electrical fire aboard an aircraft, more that likely it would have been a big BOOM instead of smoke.


She's just making up stuff to get attention or is drunk again.

Guest


Guest

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:Oh come on Chrissy. That is a bit far fetched even for you. If they had really wanted her dead it certainly would not be an electrical fire aboard an aircraft, more that likely it would have been a big BOOM instead of smoke.

well i did add my own spin to it he he

but its scary never the less. I bet this woman has been on plenty of planes so what are the odds that all of a sudden theres a electrical fire. apparently smkoe filled the cock pit.

they need to have better security around her, romney and check those planes out very well before hand. I could see where many radical groups might want to harm them. including all those who hate israel.....

and when are you going to take dreams to your forum. why dont you help her out and sign her up, she may not know how to do that.

2seaoat



Again, everybody jumps somebody when they have a wild theory on the who could have done something. Chrissy makes an important point. People accuse her of being drunk. As soon as you try to explain the who......you look like a tinfoiler. You can be dismissed.

However, let us try an analysis which ignores the who. Let us go directly to the why would someone gain an advantage by harming Romney's wife. Chrissy thinks that Muslims would do this. Well radical Islam would love to see Romney elected because he will go to war with Iran. America will further descend into the abyss. Osama always wanted to have America over react. So, yes radical Islam could want Romney's wife dead because Romney would get a sympathy vote and possibly stop the electoral slide. He could have become president if his wife had died.

The very dark money of the Industrial military complex is a who.....but the why is war makes incredible profits for them, and a Romney win is good so one candidates wife's death accomplishes their goal.....President Romney going to war with Iran. Finally, Israel is fighting for its very survival, and Iran is a real and tangible threat. Their military has clearly told their leadership that the military option by them alone will not work.....they need the United States to fight their battle and Obama recognizes America has different interests than Israel, but Romney has said he will use the military to stop Iran from getting the bomb.

The truth is it was probably a simple electrical fire where a smart and experienced pilot saved her life......But Chrissy may be wrong on which of the whos were responsible, but to deny that the why exists is to deny the obvious. America has to realize that Fox News is a for profit business and is a conduit for a great many of the whos...........focus on the why, and America will quickly get back on track.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Again, everybody jumps somebody when they have a wild theory on the who could have done something. Chrissy makes an important point. People accuse her of being drunk. As soon as you try to explain the who......you look like a tinfoiler. You can be dismissed.

However, let us try an analysis which ignores the who. Let us go directly to the why would someone gain an advantage by harming Romney's wife. Chrissy thinks that Muslims would do this. Well radical Islam would love to see Romney elected because he will go to war with Iran. America will further descend into the abyss. Osama always wanted to have America over react. So, yes radical Islam could want Romney's wife dead because Romney would get a sympathy vote and possibly stop the electoral slide. He could have become president if his wife had died.

The very dark money of the Industrial military complex is a who.....but the why is war makes incredible profits for them, and a Romney win is good so one candidates wife's death accomplishes their goal.....President Romney going to war with Iran. Finally, Israel is fighting for its very survival, and Iran is a real and tangible threat. Their military has clearly told their leadership that the military option by them alone will not work.....they need the United States to fight their battle and Obama recognizes America has different interests than Israel, but Romney has said he will use the military to stop Iran from getting the bomb.

The truth is it was probably a simple electrical fire where a smart and experienced pilot saved her life......But Chrissy may be wrong on which of the whos were responsible, but to deny that the why exists is to deny the obvious. America has to realize that Fox News is a for profit business and is a conduit for a great many of the whos...........focus on the why, and America will quickly get back on track.

Well I for one am not going to sit here and spend my time trying to analyze something that was nothing more than a freak a incident in the first place.

2seaoat



Well I for one am not going to sit here and spend my time trying to analyze something that was nothing more than a freak a incident in the first place.

Paul Wellstone single handed focus on the Bankruptcy Reform Act stalled the same for years. He knew that the bill would amount to Wall Street and the big banks turning American citizens into indentured servants. He knew our forefathers put bankruptcy in the constitution because we fought a revolution largely because of the exploitation of the American colonists by English monied class who sucked America dry as the crown restricted manufacturing, and set up tariffs which allowed for the exploitation of America.

Paul Wellstone died in a mysterious plane crash. Within months of his death the Bankruptcy reform act was rammed through Congress. The next two years every American was sent credit cards in the mail where they ran up their credit.....home equity loans when viral.....the floodgates opened and America bit into the hook. Wall Street and the Banks then set the hook in the American public.....TARP and the fed printing money.....America became indentured servants.....and Paul Wellstone's airplane.....well of course......there would be no reason to question the WHY.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Again, everybody jumps somebody when they have a wild theory on the who could have done something. Chrissy makes an important point. People accuse her of being drunk. As soon as you try to explain the who......you look like a tinfoiler. You can be dismissed.

However, let us try an analysis which ignores the who. Let us go directly to the why would someone gain an advantage by harming Romney's wife. Chrissy thinks that Muslims would do this. Well radical Islam would love to see Romney elected because he will go to war with Iran. America will further descend into the abyss. Osama always wanted to have America over react. So, yes radical Islam could want Romney's wife dead because Romney would get a sympathy vote and possibly stop the electoral slide. He could have become president if his wife had died.

The very dark money of the Industrial military complex is a who.....but the why is war makes incredible profits for them, and a Romney win is good so one candidates wife's death accomplishes their goal.....President Romney going to war with Iran. Finally, Israel is fighting for its very survival, and Iran is a real and tangible threat. Their military has clearly told their leadership that the military option by them alone will not work.....they need the United States to fight their battle and Obama recognizes America has different interests than Israel, but Romney has said he will use the military to stop Iran from getting the bomb.

The truth is it was probably a simple electrical fire where a smart and experienced pilot saved her life......But Chrissy may be wrong on which of the whos were responsible, but to deny that the why exists is to deny the obvious. America has to realize that Fox News is a for profit business and is a conduit for a great many of the whos...........focus on the why, and America will quickly get back on track.

That's way out there,Seaoat and people need to stop w/ all these wild allegations based on no facts whatsoever. If there's evidence the plane was tampered with that's one thing but just because there was a malfunction is to feed the frenzy of the crazies. Chrissy makes wild unsubstantiated allegations all the time and admits she is drinking when posting so it is no surprise when people surmise she is drunk.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Well I for one am not going to sit here and spend my time trying to analyze something that was nothing more than a freak a incident in the first place.

Paul Wellstone single handed focus on the Bankruptcy Reform Act stalled the same for years. He knew that the bill would amount to Wall Street and the big banks turning American citizens into indentured servants. He knew our forefathers put bankruptcy in the constitution because we fought a revolution largely because of the exploitation of the American colonists by English monied class who sucked America dry as the crown restricted manufacturing, and set up tariffs which allowed for the exploitation of America.

Paul Wellstone died in a mysterious plane crash. Within months of his death the Bankruptcy reform act was rammed through Congress. The next two years every American was sent credit cards in the mail where they ran up their credit.....home equity loans when viral.....the floodgates opened and America bit into the hook. Wall Street and the Banks then set the hook in the American public.....TARP and the fed printing money.....America became indentured servants.....and Paul Wellstone's airplane.....well of course......there would be no reason to question the WHY.

Except there was no evidence his crash was anything but an accident.You can speculate all you want but it doesn't make it true.

2seaoat



You have not been carefully reading my posts. To prove any allegation of conspiracy requires identifying the who. I admit that it is foolish to try to identify the who. Rather, I simply talk about the why. Why would people want Mitt Romney's wife to die in an air crash, or why would people want Paul Wellstone to die in an aircrash. The why requires looking at tangible facts where some people would gain an advantage. I agree completely with you that to jump to the who requires a rock solid evidence which by the nature of the ease to execute a sabotage without being caught is next to impossible to prove. If you have listened to what I have said for seven years on these fourms about 911 is that I find the conspiracy theories on 911 foolish. They focus on the wrong analysis. I think if you look at that analysis and stay focused on the why.......you can do a much better job in delineating policy which ultimately can defeat any number of people who are trying to accomplish those goals. So I agree if you think I am pointing a finger at a defined party......I am simply saying that a group of parties see an advantage to have certain actions happen.....to deny the why is worse than arbitrarily choosing a who.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:You have not been carefully reading my posts. To prove any allegation of conspiracy requires identifying the who. I admit that it is foolish to try to identify the who. Rather, I simply talk about the why. Why would people want Mitt Romney's wife to die in an air crash, or why would people want Paul Wellstone to die in an aircrash. The why requires looking at tangible facts where some people would gain an advantage. I agree completely with you that to jump to the who requires a rock solid evidence which by the nature of the ease to execute a sabotage without being caught is next to impossible to prove. If you have listened to what I have said for seven years on these fourms about 911 is that I find the conspiracy theories on 911 foolish. They focus on the wrong analysis. I think if you look at that analysis and stay focused on the why.......you can do a much better job in delineating policy which ultimately can defeat any number of people who are trying to accomplish those goals. So I agree if you think I am pointing a finger at a defined party......I am simply saying that a group of parties see an advantage to have certain actions happen.....to deny the why is worse than arbitrarily choosing a who.

The most sensible why would be to kill Obama rather than take chances on some calculation of something. I don't buy anytime there is an incident there is some sinister motive.

2seaoat



Then I congratulate you on a pure mind and innocence. I have no pure mind, and I no longer have the innocence of my youth. I have actively worked to use every advantage to look out for my business interests, and that has included actions which promote my business which has included friends writing letters to the editor saying good things about my business. It may seem a small thing, but it brought me advantage, and my friends who wrote those letters did not give the disclosure of their conflict of interest.....and I benefited. So when I see national and international manipulation of public opinion, I understand the why......I am not a virgin.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

2seaoat wrote:Well I for one am not going to sit here and spend my time trying to analyze something that was nothing more than a freak a incident in the first place.

Paul Wellstone single handed focus on the Bankruptcy Reform Act stalled the same for years. He knew that the bill would amount to Wall Street and the big banks turning American citizens into indentured servants. He knew our forefathers put bankruptcy in the constitution because we fought a revolution largely because of the exploitation of the American colonists by English monied class who sucked America dry as the crown restricted manufacturing, and set up tariffs which allowed for the exploitation of America.

Paul Wellstone died in a mysterious plane crash. Within months of his death the Bankruptcy reform act was rammed through Congress. The next two years every American was sent credit cards in the mail where they ran up their credit.....home equity loans when viral.....the floodgates opened and America bit into the hook. Wall Street and the Banks then set the hook in the American public.....TARP and the fed printing money.....America became indentured servants.....and Paul Wellstone's airplane.....well of course......there would be no reason to question the WHY.

He was also one of the most vocal opponents of going to war with Iraq.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

2seaoat wrote:You have not been carefully reading my posts. To prove any allegation of conspiracy requires identifying the who. I admit that it is foolish to try to identify the who. Rather, I simply talk about the why. Why would people want Mitt Romney's wife to die in an air crash, or why would people want Paul Wellstone to die in an aircrash. The why requires looking at tangible facts where some people would gain an advantage. I agree completely with you that to jump to the who requires a rock solid evidence which by the nature of the ease to execute a sabotage without being caught is next to impossible to prove. If you have listened to what I have said for seven years on these fourms about 911 is that I find the conspiracy theories on 911 foolish. They focus on the wrong analysis. I think if you look at that analysis and stay focused on the why.......you can do a much better job in delineating policy which ultimately can defeat any number of people who are trying to accomplish those goals. So I agree if you think I am pointing a finger at a defined party......I am simply saying that a group of parties see an advantage to have certain actions happen.....to deny the why is worse than arbitrarily choosing a who.

Then your analysis of who did 9/11 should focus on the missing trillions from the Pentagon, the ongoing (at that time) investigations into that missing money, the targeting of said investigators in the attacks, and the put options from that time period.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum